The evil Queen bombs Nigerian churches for Christmas

[Peter Dow]

BBC

BBC: Nigeria churches hit by blasts during Christmas prayers



A series of bomb attacks in Nigeria, including two on Christmas Day church services, have left at least 32 people dead and many injured.

The Islamist group Boko Haram said it carried out the attacks, including one on St Theresa's Church in Madalla, near the capital Abuja, that killed 27.

A second explosion shortly after hit a church in the central city of Jos. A policeman died during gunfire.

Three attacks in northern Yobe state left four people dead.

Two hit the town of Damaturu, and a third struck Gadaka. Yobe state has been the epicentre of violence between security forces and Boko Haram militants.

Churches bombed by royal command

The evil Queen Elizabeth in association with allied royals in the Saudi royal family allowed the orders to go out from Mecca to terrorists in Nigeria - "bomb Nigerian churches for Christmas".

As at least 32 Nigerians were killed and many injured by royal command, Queen Elizabeth broadcast her Christmas lies on TV thanks to the gullible fools in the BBC and other TV channels.

Hey media fools - no the Queen is not a good Christian and no she is not a good leader of the Commonwealth to be implicated in terrorist crimes against the people!

Royalist terrorists are waging war on believers and on members of the Commonwealth, killing innocents while the UK royal family and royal families all over the world are making merry and generally living lives of privilege and safety.

In order to guarantee true believers of all faiths the freedom to worship in peace and safety then all evil royal families throughout the world who do abuse religion to incite terrorists to kill and to terrorise the people into bowing down to royalty must be overthrown in favour of democratic republics.

[Camera Stellata]

Very poor taste, Dow.

[Requiem in Mortis]

> implying the Queen of England actually has the power to order such attacks

Next you'll be telling me that Akihito is baiting North Korea into attacking Japan.

[Kazuma]

Quote:

The evil Queen Elizabeth in association with allied royals in the Saudi royal family allowed the orders to go out from Mecca to terrorists in Nigeria - "bomb Nigerian churches for Christmas"..

Why would the order go out from Mecca if the Saudi capital and the Saudi royal family are in Riyadh?

[Dostya]

"I get to take credit for something? Me?! And it's not crumpet-eating, tea-drinking or chatting with retired statesmen? Golly."

[Comrade Texada Wolf]

Requiem in Mortis

> implying the Queen of England actually has the power to order such attacks

Next you'll be telling me that Akihito is baiting North Korea into attacking Japan.

Well actually in her vast prerogative powers she does have the power to Deploy armed forces overseas.

[Invictus_88]

Dow,

Get a job, you scrotum.

[Bane of Ezekiel]

Comrade Texada Wolf

Requiem in Mortis

> implying the Queen of England actually has the power to order such attacks

Next you'll be telling me that Akihito is baiting North Korea into attacking Japan.

Well actually in her vast prerogative powers she does have the power to Deploy armed forces overseas.

Yes, but the royals probably last did that in WWII.

[Old Blue Collar Joe]

Damn Dow. You could have had a good topic, but instead decide to go off on the 'share the power/wealth' and 'conspiracy theory' path, and just flat out goat ******** your topic to death in one post.

[Peter Dow]

Camera Stellata

Very poor taste, Dow.

When you are fighting a war on terror, good "taste" is not a weapon of choice.

Whereas the truth, in identifying the enemy is a weapon of choice however distasteful that is to those who have been duped by the enemy.

If my truth makes the Duke of Rothesay's d**k in your mouth taste not so sweet then spit it out or bite down hard.

[Peter Dow]

Requiem in Mortis

> implying the Queen of England

Technically she is not the Queen "of England" because the English people haven't voted for her in a free and fair election for head of an English state.

The Queen is imposed on the English as much as King George III was once imposed on the American colonials.

Requiem in Mortis

> actually has the power to order such attacks

Her Majesty's Governments have the power to do deals which sustain the Saudi kingdom instead of waging war and supporting republican revolution to overthrow the monarchy.

The Queen as the current monarch and the figurehead of kingdom is 100% in the way of the English or Scottish or any British people electing a president as head of a republican state which would stop the dealing and start fighting the war on terror to win.

Anyway, if I need to spell out where the orders for such terrorist attacks come from I will do so now.

Mecca

The orders for all Islamic terrorists come from the religious leaders in Mecca, invited to Mecca, allowed to visit Mecca or otherwise tolerated by Mecca.

The opposite of that would be a fatwa or religious death sentence from every religious authority in Mecca against any and all Muslim clerics in the world anywhere who in any way didn't call for religious war against this Nigerian group of terrorists Boko Haram.

If Mecca was innocent in these matters then the Jihadis the world over would be trying to kill Boko Haram, not seeing them as fellow Jihadis.

So Mecca is guilty of these terrorist bombings of Churches.

The Saudi royal family

Mecca is in Saudi Arabia where Mecca is and if the Mecca religious authorities did anything the Saudi royals disapproved of they would be arrested, thrown in jail or get their heads cut off.

What the Mecca religious authorities say is by royal command.

So when the Mecca authorities order or condone terrorist bombings they do so by royal command of the Saudi royals who rule Mecca.

The United Kingdom, and Her Majesty's Governments

The UK has good relations with the Saudi monarchy and are not at war with the Saudi royals, are not taking out their satellites, not supporting democratic republican revolution against the Saudi royals, are trading with the Saudis etc.

So the way the Saudi royals run Mecca ordering terrorist bombings is OK by the UK.

So the guilt of the Saudi royals is shared by the UK government - the UK is also implicated in these bombings.

The Queen

The Queen is 100% in the way of the UK being overthrown to get a republic and an elected president who could dismiss any government which was not waging war on the Saudi monarchy and the way they run Mecca for terrorism.

So long as there is any kind of monarch, even a figurehead monarch, that is enough to stop this country becoming a republic.

You by not supporting assassination of the Queen

By poo-pooing the Queen's relevance and not calling for republican revolution against the monarchy, you too are keeping the UK going, keeping peace with Saudi royals, their Mecca ordered terrorism and the bombing of churches.

So you are in favour of bombing Christian churches simply because you are not for war to remove the Queen, the UK, the Saudi royals, the Mecca organisation of terrorism.

Requiem in Mortis

Next you'll be telling me that Akihito is baiting North Korea into attacking Japan.

No actually next I would focus on how US presidents have also been doing deals with the Saudi monarchy instead of fighting the war on Mecca-inspired terrorism.

As far as North Korea goes, this hermit kingdom is the vicious guard dog of China who barks and strains at its chains to maul any democratic influence spreading to China from South Korea.

As far as the Japanese Emperor goes by standing in the way of a Japanese republic and president, the Japanese emperor is to blame for the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster because a Japanese president could well have acted to dismiss the Japanese government that was allowing such poor management of this nuclear power facility.

[Peter Dow]

Kazuma

Quote:

The evil Queen Elizabeth in association with allied royals in the Saudi royal family allowed the orders to go out from Mecca to terrorists in Nigeria - "bomb Nigerian churches for Christmas"..

Why would the order go out from Mecca if the Saudi capital and the Saudi royal family are in Riyadh?

Loyalty to a royal family does not so easily inspire terrorists to sacrifice their lives in the way that loyalty to God can.

Hence monarchies who want their enemies killed will often employ religious leaders as proxy agents to whip up believers to holy war.

Often monarchs will establish branches of a religion as a state religion and place themselves at the head of that branch if that religion cannot be bent to his will, as with the establishment of the Church of England.

Whereas the Italian monarchists and fascists in World War 2 had "hands on" control of the Pope, in the Vatican in Rome and so could force him to bless their wars.

The Saudi monarch is "Custodian of the Mecca mosques" or something and anyway whatever his formal position with regard to Islamic authorities having physical control of the Saudi kingdom's police and armed forces means he calls the shots in Mecca and decides who preaches in the name of Islam in that city.

More important is all the Islamic states control broadcasting so they can spin the message from Mecca by selecting which clerics are to be allowed to appear to speak for Islam on the TV.

Not having the terrorism done in the name of Riyadh or the Saudi royal family, but in the name of "Islam" helps to maintain the fiction to the gullible, such as the CIA & US presidents, that somehow this terrorism is not state sponsored when it is exactly state sponsored.

I mean what would be the point in monarchs and dictators employing a "secret" agent who names his or her employer? It would not be a secret if it is obvious to everyone who the agent is working for.

It is only obvious in the movies like "Mission Impossible" because the plot reveals to the viewers who the agents are working for.

In reality, secret agents disguise who they are working for. That is the whole point of anyone employing a "secret" agent. rolleyes

I mean if the terrorists attacking America on 9/11 were dressed in Saudi military uniform and had come straight from Riyadh with orders signed by the Saudi king that would kind of make even President Bush and President Obama realise that there was some double-dealing and back-stabbing going on by the Saudi royals, right?

It is as obvious to me as identifying the villain in a movie or pantomime that Al Qaeda are state sponsored, not only by the Taliban - Afghanistan was only their initial physical base - but more importantly by the Saudi kingdom and the Pakistani military establishment and any other Islamic state that wants to wage war on the west without the risk of immediate consequences to themselves.

[Peter Dow]

Dostya

"I get to take credit for something? Me?! And it's not crumpet-eating, tea-drinking or chatting with retired statesmen? Golly."

Bombing Christian Churches in Nigeria or anywhere else is not something the Queen wants to be in the frame for. "Credit" is not the right word.

The Queen as monarch of the UK takes nominal credit for a lot that is done by the kingdom. It is after all called "Her Majesty's Government". The prisons are called "Her Majesty's Prison ...".

The politicians do swear to serve the Queen and successors before they are allowed by the kingdom officers (who also swear such an oath) to exercise the power of government.

So the Queen is formally responsible and completely 100% in the way of the establishment of a republic. A figurehead do-nothing monarch is all royalists need to block the way to a republic.

It is like if the road maintenance workers want to block a road. Yes they can use an on-duty do-something police officer to block that road and divert traffic. But a do-nothing line of road cones and a diversion sign will do the job just as well.

So yes, a do-something active monarch with real power would block the way to a republic. Yes he or she would, and the Saudi King does.

But a do-nothing figurehead monarch like the Queen also blocks the way to a republic and stops the people electing a president as head of state.

So answer the question - who is blocking our elected British presidents from waging war on the Saudi monarchy to stop Mecca-inspired terrorism?

Answer - the Queen. So the Queen is in the frame for the Nigerian church bombings, whether she likes it, or you like it, or not.

[Peter Dow]

Comrade Texada Wolf

Requiem in Mortis

> implying the Queen of England actually has the power to order such attacks

Next you'll be telling me that Akihito is baiting North Korea into attacking Japan.

Well actually in her vast prerogative powers she does have the power to Deploy armed forces overseas.

Only in her name but not on her personal whim other than if it is her whim always to accede to the wishes of her kingdom's ministers.

We see this most clearly when say the Queen's Canadian ministers didn't want to invade Iraq, the Canadian Queen's forces didn't go.

When the Queen's Australian ministers wanted to invade Vietnam, they sent the Queen's Australian forces, though the UK ministers didn't send UK forces.

So the royalist political elites who rule in each kingdom in the realm call the actual shots though it is in the monarch's name.

However the real issue is removing control over the kingdom's armies from a royalist elite who control the state of the kingdom, a state accountable only to itself with lip-service to democracy paid using rigged elections, removing control from the royalist elite to the people via the establishment of a genuinely democratic republic which holds the state accountable to the people.

If we the people want to stop terrorist bombings of churches then we'll need to elect a president as head of state of a republic to order our military to wage war on the masters of Islamic terrorism calling the shots from Mecca.

We the people will require to remove the monarchy and kingdom first so identifying the Queen as complicit in church bombings will assist us in instigating republican revolution.

[Peter Dow]

Invictus_88

Dow,

Get a job,.

So I can pay taxes to a state which denies the freedoms and rights of the people?

So you are inviting me to become a lackey of the evil UK state, like you are perhaps?

Thanks, but no thanks.