Heimdalr
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 18:32:41 +0000
In recent weeks, surely you've heard of the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and his cabal of terrorists comprising of Glenn Greenwald and half the Washington Post. The Axis of Words and Facts, as they've probably been pejoratively called not even once. (Haven't had internet in a week) They've conspired to reveal not only what we all have known for a decade, that the US is monitoring most telecommunications everywhere, but that the NSA itself is lying to the Senate in order to do so. That's the secondary topic here, though, as an internal quarrel over accountability should be a domestic issue, if it even comes to life as an impotent, timid form of half-begging the NSA to stop and we will make pancakes and brew cocoa.
The most pertinent issue is the boxing in of Evo Morales' plane over Austria, where we have seen Spain, Italy, France and Portugal - countries that formerly denounced the US for the activities described in the leaks - deny the highest tier of diplomatic envoy use of their airspace with no prior warning. The issue is one of sovereignty, and if the EU can even entertain a pretense of it any more. The issue is also one of Latin America; where such things are now being debated fiercely and terms like "act of war" are commonplace.
"We're not going to scramble jets to get this 29-year old hacker", Obama said. And he was not lying. The US would scrap that plan, save the fuel, and have their vassal states scramble their Rafales and Typhoons in case this Bolivian equivalent of Air Force One approached their borders.
This draws a few historical parallels. Alexandr Dubček under the Soviets in 1968, or Serbian nationalists under the Habsburg Empire. Pissing in these people's shoes is a foolproof recipe for backlash, and the US should know this better than anyone.
Discuss -
Does the EU really have sovereignty, do their leaders tell the public whatever they want to hear and then kiss Obama's toes with that same mouth?
Bonus: Do international air transportation treaties actually allow this at all?
Latin America. Bush was a right proper shithead, but no one act of his alienated more of them than this.
The Senate and how they are weak and therefore deserve to suffer.
The most pertinent issue is the boxing in of Evo Morales' plane over Austria, where we have seen Spain, Italy, France and Portugal - countries that formerly denounced the US for the activities described in the leaks - deny the highest tier of diplomatic envoy use of their airspace with no prior warning. The issue is one of sovereignty, and if the EU can even entertain a pretense of it any more. The issue is also one of Latin America; where such things are now being debated fiercely and terms like "act of war" are commonplace.
"We're not going to scramble jets to get this 29-year old hacker", Obama said. And he was not lying. The US would scrap that plan, save the fuel, and have their vassal states scramble their Rafales and Typhoons in case this Bolivian equivalent of Air Force One approached their borders.
This draws a few historical parallels. Alexandr Dubček under the Soviets in 1968, or Serbian nationalists under the Habsburg Empire. Pissing in these people's shoes is a foolproof recipe for backlash, and the US should know this better than anyone.
Discuss -
Does the EU really have sovereignty, do their leaders tell the public whatever they want to hear and then kiss Obama's toes with that same mouth?
Bonus: Do international air transportation treaties actually allow this at all?
Latin America. Bush was a right proper shithead, but no one act of his alienated more of them than this.
The Senate and how they are weak and therefore deserve to suffer.