Anon E. Mouse
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:40:40 +0000
Zero_2005
Extend that line of thinking.
The people ellect the green party canadent for president.
The courts overrule it and keep obama, because the green party isn't a legitimate party in the congress. Or because it's a 2 party system and there can't be a 3rd party. or something just as stupid.
Courts can only review under the scope of superior court cases (lower case, not capital) or constitutional law.
Quote:
And they would cite the prop 8 case as president.
It's a state court, sweetie. It's only binding in the state of California, it's non-precedential for anything other then California cases.
Quote:
Think things through. You are willfuly bending over and letting the courts take power away from the people because the courts think the people are wrong.
Well, technically; the courts are keeping the people from taking rights away from other people. Horrible thing, that. /sarcasm.
Quote:
Iraq 2.0. Don't come crying to me when you are ordered to town square to reciet the pledge of alligence 5 times a day, or something equaly retarded
Yeah no.
I don't be mean here, but the crux of your argument seems to be: "I don't know how the court system works, and they might do something bad in the future!"
Again, judicial review has been around for two centuries give or take. If someone were to use it as a tool to seize dictatorial power, you'd think that might've happened at least once by now?