OBAMA VS BUSH

[CokeVoAYCE]

show your views, im curious.

[The Curse]

Neither. Clinton or bust.

[UF6]

[Disa Uniflora]

[Noogie]

Bush is pretty old now, I'm sure Obama could beat the living crap out of him.

[Old Blue Collar Joe]

Looks like someone just woke up from a four year coma. In an alternate universe.

[The New Wineskin]

None of the above?

[Noogie]

The New Wineskin

None of the above?

Surely at least one will get the other into a headlock or something?

[MinnieMay]

or as i say Bush or Bush 2.0 or Obama 2.0 IE Mitt. its all the same crap no matter how you look at it they are all doing the same thing. If Obama was an "R" and Mitt was a "D" the News would running after Mitt sniffing his a** they way they do to Obama and attacking Obama every turn. I am going to do the same thing I do every election mix what people have said up and see if people even know the truth or just the R and the D. So fare the just the R and the D have won.

[meta-madness]

MinnieMay

or as i say Bush or Bush 2.0 or Obama 2.0 IE Mitt. its all the same crap no matter how you look at it they are all doing the same thing. If Obama was an "R" and Mitt was a "D" the News would running after Mitt sniffing his a** they way they do to Obama and attacking Obama every turn. I am going to do the same thing I do every election mix what people have said up and see if people even know the truth or just the R and the D. So fare the just the R and the D have won.

Your choice of voting is very...Interesting to be truthful.

[Caffienated Sprite]

Bush didn't intend to destroy the economy, and neither did Obama. I just wish Obama would realize that he SUCKS at fixing the economy and at this point he should take as much, if not MORE blame than Bush for this mess.

[Wendigo]

Caffienated Sprite

Bush didn't intend to destroy the economy, and neither did Obama. I just wish Obama would realize that he SUCKS at fixing the economy and at this point he should take as much, if not MORE blame than Bush for this mess.

If he were to go about it Bush's way (which is to say, deregulation and privatization for the sake of deregulation and privatization), we'd just wind up with another Coolidge and another Hoover down the road. In terms of our long term stability, what we really need is a serious round of meaningful regulation in high finance. Perhaps in terms of taking a hacksaw to some of the bloated, decrepit giants which dominate it, like John Pierpoint Morgan's brood.

Much better off doing critical infrastructure upgrades that have been put off for decades. Like the aging power grid, for example, could really do with some tweaks; it's substantially the system we had in the '50s. If it were a horse, we'd have shot it by now.