Nuclear program in Iran - what do you think should be done?

[Amelia Hood]

Lord Cameron

Vercingetorix VII

Lord Cameron

Vercingetorix VII

Lord Cameron

I like telling black people to their face that they should thank slavery.

So you're ignorant and a horrific human being. Cool.

Hey, they'd still be confined to Africa confronting even worse segregation if it wasn't for slavery.

Africa would be a lot better condition if it wasn't the victim of centuries of warfare to fuel the guns-for-slaves trade.

This is like a descendant of Huns that sacked Rome and dragged off a bunch of slaves commenting on how lucky those slaves are not to live in their sacked and dessicated city.

but they made great poets

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

[Vercingetorix VII]

DanskiWolf

Amongst_many

Israel is in fact an entire Jewish country, which uses the Holocaust to justify it's own atrocities and accuses anyone who criticizes it of being a crypto-Nazi.

Mmm, so much argumentum ad nauseum rolled into one post.

Yes, remember, kids, the Gaza war wasn't about Hamas rockets, it was because of the Holocaust. Or at least that's what the extreme leftoids and their Islamist chums keep telling me.

It's impossible to have an argumentum ad nauseum in a single post. By definition, argumentum ad nauseum has to be used repeatedly.

Like the claims that anything Israel does is justified because it's defending itself against those barbarous Palestinians, so we shouldn't investigate the apartheid and brutal oppression too much.

[DanskiWolf]

Vercingetorix VII

It's impossible to have an argumentum ad nauseum in a single post. By definition, argumentum ad nauseum has to be used repeatedly.

And it is used repeatedly by the Hamas cheersquad. That's why I have a theroy that you "anti-zionists"(tm) all come from the same clone factory because you post the same lies over and over. (Israel uses Holocaust for bla bla bla, they call us anti-semites bla bla blaf).

Quote:

Like the claims that anything Israel does is justified because it's defending itself against those barbarous Palestinians, so we shouldn't investigate the apartheid and brutal oppression too much.

Oh look, you did it again. Multi-racial liberal states = apartheiid? Sure, if it's Israel.

[Amelia Hood]

Yes, let's keep apartheid out of this, please.

[Amongst_many]

DanskiWolf

Amongst_many

Israel is in fact an entire Jewish country, which uses the Holocaust to justify it's own atrocities and accuses anyone who criticizes it of being a crypto-Nazi.

Mmm, so much argumentum ad nauseum rolled into one post.

Yes, remember, kids, the Gaza war wasn't about Hamas rockets, it was because of the Holocaust. Or at least that's what the extreme leftoids and their Islamist chums keep telling me.

Wrong quote talk2hand

[Lord Cameron]

Amelia Hood

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

I bet you cry over spilled milk all the time

And yes, its totally ok for the U.S. to tell people what to do, its caleld stability.

[largo round]

Amongst_many

Largo Round

anti-Semitic much? what atrocities? you mean against the palestinians. dont they blow up buses with kids on them? you cant generalize a group, but you can with a nation like Iran because THEIR ******** LEADER IS COMPLETELY INSANE AND HOSTILE

Wow, just wow, read up a bit on what's going on there cause you honestly don't have the slightest clue on what Israel is doing to them.

Amongst_many

Spokesman for UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) Chris Gunness, said: "It looks like phosphorus, it smells like phosphorus and it burns like phosphorus.

"White phosphorus cannot be put out with water.

"You can’t put it out with traditional methods such as fire extinguishers.

"You need sand but we do not have any sand in the compound."

The Geneva Convention bans the use of white phosphorus, which burns at extremely high temperatures, as a weapon of war in civilian areas. However there is no blanket ban under international law on its use as a smokescreen or for illumination.

Many Palestinians in Gaza have reportedly sustained serious injuries from the substance which is classified as a 'chemical weapon' by US intelligence.

The building was clearly marked with UN flags and officials were blaming Israel for the attack.

http://www.amnesty.org.au/news/comments/20118/P20/

http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=14222

http://www.commondreams.org/files/article_images/whitephosporus_un.jpg

_______________________________________________________________________

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1112493.html

_______________________________________________________________________


Rick Sanchez (CNN) does the research and finds that Israel violated the terms of the ceasefire first by killing 6 Gazans on November 4. Shouldn't media outlets check the facts before running with a story?

_______________________________________________________________________

It's Israel's latest weapon: Without notice, an Israeli jet fighter flies low over the densely populated Gaza Strip, breaking the sound barrier.


Dr. Eyad Sarraj, a psychiatrist in Gaza, says it is the children who are harmed the most.


"For children under the age of 6, large noise means danger, a danger to life," he said. "This is definitely a form of collective punishment, which under international law is prohibited and considered a war crime."

_______________________________________________________________________

Gaza-based gynecologist Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish, 54, a widower and father of five, represents hope and a brighter future to many in Israel. Fluent in Hebrew, Abuelaish is a quasi-celebrity on Israeli television, due to his guest appearances to discuss health issues. However, it was on Jan. 16, 2009 that his personal tragedy--captured in a phone call broadcast live by a quick-thinking Israeli journalist-brought both sides, Israelis and Palestinians, closer together.

On that day an Israeli tank missile struck Dr. Abuelaish's home in the Jabalya Refugee Camp, as he was preparing to go on live Israeli television with a phone-in medical segment about women's health. Killed in the attack were his daughters Aya, 14, Mayar, 15, and Bissan, 21, and his niece, Noor, 17.

In a telephone interview, he recalled the day so many of his family members were killed.

"We [the Jabalya Refugee Camp] were under attack," he explained, "and there was no electricity in the house. I asked my daughters to save the cell phone batteries for my television segment on women's health."

_______________________________________________________________________

Largo Round

if you knew what you were talking about, youd realize the jews didnt set up israel, britian and its allies did

Yes, but Israel is the one that's pushing for a further marginalization of the palestine and control all of their resources and shoot them up in the cage they created for them.

Quote:

i dont think they should be invaded until they become a legitimate threat, which might be soon

i just dont want them to have any kind of say or influence on the US or its allies, if them having nuclear power (which puts them on a higher order than other countries) elevates them in any way, i am against it until they remove their ******** leader and government and form a more ******** that, more CIVILIZED society

******** west and east, its about not being savages (i understand the people from iran are smart and very capable, but they need to break off the shackles of islam-fascism before i alter my statements or attitude about iran as a nation)

and yes they did do alot of ******** up s**t, mostly to their own people. and what do you mean exploited by the west? god damn you sound like one of those rich suburban white guys who loves to post on che-lives from his parents basement

******** you

So what are you going to do huh? You think the US has to bring down their leader? Maybe even choose a better one for them that'll bow down to all their whims regardless if it's bad for the population? What about making a trade embargo that'll cause hundreds of thousands of death and lower the life quality thus making ignorance more widespread? Are you going to blame them for that too?

You know what Iran did on 9/11? They sympathized with the US, they went on the streets and marched around in their honor, the US then put then on the Axis of evil. What about Iran Air Flight 655? I bet you know all about that.

Why don't you learn a thing or two about the middle east and how the US just shits all over them before opening your mouth and throwing a ignorant as hell rant about their situation. Which brings us to:

Quote:

ya, still not buying it, i dont care what their excuse is, if your an a*****e, your an a*****e. you might have a good reason, but because your still an a** gives me a whole list of reasons not to trust you, to shun you, and drive you back

hows that for an analogy?

Then that fits the US perfectly since they can't pass an opportunity to be assholes, assholes to Asia, assholes to Africa, Assholes to Latin America, assholes to the middle east and assholes to Europe.

ok

so, pretty much your just giving me reasons as to why america you think america sucks, and not why iran should have nuclear anything

america=win, we are awesome and probably the best friend the world has right now (whether you want to admit it or not)

iran=backwards a** place with shitty and dangerous leaders, they shouldnt have nuclear power

[Amelia Hood]

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

I bet you cry over spilled milk all the time

And yes, its totally ok for the U.S. to tell people what to do, its caleld stability.

Yes, because that's what's resulted whenever the United States has told people what to do. Certainly.

Well, thank you for eliminating the skepticism of you being some sort of neanderthal, boss. You just went and proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

[Vercingetorix VII]

When Israel stops having one law for Israelis and one for Palestinians, and tears down the Gaza blockade, I'll consider stop calling it Apartheid. Til then, there are honestly worse things I could be calling it, especially after last winter's bombing.

[Lord Cameron]

Amelia Hood

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

I bet you cry over spilled milk all the time

And yes, its totally ok for the U.S. to tell people what to do, its caleld stability.

Yes, because that's what's resulted whenever the United States has told people what to do. Certainly.

Well, thank you for eliminating the skepticism of you being some sort of neanderthal, boss. You just went and proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

You agree with me, then call me a Neanderthal, I could too say terrible things about you, but I don't.

~
If (world war three < 0)

then (thank America for a job well done)
~

Name a time where not doing what America says has worked out, oh thats right, you can't.

[Amelia Hood]

Vercingetorix VII

When Israel stops having one law for Israelis and one for Palestinians, and tears down the Gaza blockade, I'll consider stop calling it Apartheid. Til then, there are honestly worse things I could be calling it, especially after last winter's bombing.

Well, I consider it inaccurate, and perhaps a bit offensive, given that, to my knowledge, Palestinians are not oppressed based on their race, but on their continued conflict with the Israeli Jews over possession of land. Both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would, I think, prefer to find a solution beyond meaningless bloodshed, outside of the hawks and extremists that characterize them both in the media. The minorities in Israel are ensured basic rights, including the right to vote, and I think unrestricted in marriage and employment.

There is hatred on both sides, and a strong sense of fear, and its because of resulting security issues that the barrier fence was conceived in Israel.

Comparatively, under Apartheid rule we were stripped of citizenship, education, health, and civil services were segregated, with each being inferior for non-whites and the education system being oriented towards a life of manual labour. The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act 55 and Immorality Amendment Act 21 barred mixed marriage and sexual intercourse along racial lines and during this period a mixed couple would very likely be beaten in the streets. A black person would only be able to work in white sectors if she obtained a dumb pass and their family actually was forced to stay in the black sector for the duration of this employ. And you can be damn sure that blacks had no equal right to vote. The list goes on and on.

If you'd like to inject a dose of accuracy into your analogy, then at least say that the barrier and general view taken by Israeli Jews of the Palestinians is a recipe for serious religious and national segregation. Apartheid's creators were supposedly motivated more by political reasoning than racism.

[Amelia Hood]

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

I bet you cry over spilled milk all the time

And yes, its totally ok for the U.S. to tell people what to do, its caleld stability.

Yes, because that's what's resulted whenever the United States has told people what to do. Certainly.

Well, thank you for eliminating the skepticism of you being some sort of neanderthal, boss. You just went and proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

You agree with me, then call me a Neanderthal, I could too say terrible things about you, but I don't.

~
If (world war three < 0)

then (thank America for a job well done)
~

Name a time where not doing what America says has worked out, oh thats right, you can't.

I don't agree with you, by any stretch of the imagination, unless by 'me' you're referring to the voices in your head. I certainly don't agree with what you've said about slavery, or about the United States' foreign policy.

But no matter. I'm sure that there's an ignore system on this forum. Your posts are clearly just a waste of space.

[Lord Cameron]

Amelia Hood

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

Lord Cameron

Amelia Hood

If the comment about saying thanks for slavery was in any way serious then I say now with confidence that you disgust me, and also that your ethics must be woefully flawed. I don't know what absurd system you'd use to justify taking people from their homes and families and forcing them to do your menial labour. It sounds closest to an argument from utility, and that's nothing more than argument from ineptitude.

If you're not being serious then I'm forced to inform you that you aren't funny, and that your reliance on shock and absurdity speaks volumes of your intended wit. Or lack thereof.

As to the topic of discussion, any nation with the means to pursue nuclear power and the desire to harness it deserve the opportunity. If any other nation considers itself so above the rest that it can just tell less powerful nations what, then that nation should surely be above displaying the arrogance of actually doing so.

I bet you cry over spilled milk all the time

And yes, its totally ok for the U.S. to tell people what to do, its caleld stability.

Yes, because that's what's resulted whenever the United States has told people what to do. Certainly.

Well, thank you for eliminating the skepticism of you being some sort of neanderthal, boss. You just went and proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

You agree with me, then call me a Neanderthal, I could too say terrible things about you, but I don't.

~
If (world war three < 0)

then (thank America for a job well done)
~

Name a time where not doing what America says has worked out, oh thats right, you can't.

I don't agree with you, by any stretch of the imagination, unless by 'me' you're referring to the voices in your head. I certainly don't agree with what you've said about slavery, or about the United States' foreign policy.

But no matter. I'm sure that there's an ignore system on this forum. Your posts are clearly just a waste of space.

Quote:

Yes, because that's what's resulted whenever the United States has told people what to do. Certainly.

I bet you're going to use the "sarcasm" defense now too, whatever loser.

[Amongst_many]

largo round

ok

so, pretty much your just giving me reasons as to why america you think america sucks, and not why iran should have nuclear anything

america=win, we are awesome and probably the best friend the world has right now (whether you want to admit it or not)

iran=backwards a** place with shitty and dangerous leaders, they shouldnt have nuclear power

AMERICA #1, IF I SAY IT LOUD ENOUGH IT'LL COME TRUE U S A U S A

[Amongst_many]

I love how you guys AWESOMELY supplied terrorists world wide with CIA training and weapons, that's what best friends do right?