DarknessKing
and i never said that they did but you have to agree that even though my logic and one sided rational of the situation i misguided due to the simple fact of my own experiences that even thogh few stood up to men and for there right most did not because they felt i was there place... and in the way of me losing footing this is true but my point still remain strong because of the simple fact that i have not directly said that men are overly better then woman i have only stated that the achievement and destruction caused by men have overshadowed those of women.
while you 2 have done a excellent job of throwing me down and facing me to face some simple truths you yourselves have seen at least that some of my words are in fact the truth
I'm sorry, but I must comment on how painful your posts are without proper grammer and puntuations. Please work on that.
While you didn't directly say that women were lesser than men, your first post really implies it heavily. This whole argument was about that comment, and yes, while it's true that men have had a much bigger part of leadership, I doubt it's because women are "too sensitive to be leaders", it's because that women have been oppressed, they were oppressed even here, in America, up to a little more than 100 years ago. That was one of the points I was making. The other point I was making was on your comment on being "overshadowed" by the male leaders in History. While that is somewhat true, it didn't help your point at all.
While you might have some "truths", they were put into some really odd places. Anyone with even a slight knowlage of history knows that women were overshadowed. But as said earlier, it's not because women are "too sensitive to be leader", it's because they were thought to be lesser than men, such as you are/were impling earlier.
I'm going to close this by saying...
"Behind every great man, is an even greater woman"
--(Name slips my mind)