azulmagia
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:26:10 +0000
Wendigo
Complex Systems
azulmagia
Well, different sorts of "libertarians" have endorsed different flavours of slavery-in-all-but-name, so why not a "libertarian" who endorses womb-slavery?
As a socialist, isn't any capitalist tacitly supporting slavery?
http://cog.kent.edu/lib/Philmore1/Philmore1.htm
Not that it's not a reasonable question for azul.
Well, there's a "libertarian" case for guys like Pinochet, so one for outright slavery would be the next logical step.
And yeah, the contract between worker and the capitalist is only free and voluntary in form, not in content, because the contracting parties belong to unequal classes, as Marx pointed out.
Then there's the matter of alienation, which implies that everyone in such a society is reduced to being personifications of socio-economic relations, and hence all are in some sense unfree.