Welcome to Gaia! :: How To be a respected member of ED Politics

Log In

Forgot your login?

Sign Up

Register
 
GST
Export this topic to other sites using WildFire!
forum:58, topic:2503204
1 2 3 ... 17 18 19 >
Post: 2503204_1 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:38 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:38 am
First, a couple of relevant announcements.

"danjel"
I have already moved numerous threads on the topic of "do you like Bush". This is getting ridiculous.

These threads are always below ED standard, being, usually, only one sentence in length. They are nearly always repeat threads, as there are already a number of threads on the topic of Bush and his policies that do satisfy the requirements for an ED thread.

Be aware, if you post such threads here in ED-P, you will be warned for spam.


"Shaviv"
Please for the sake of all that is holy, stop creating "Conservativism/Liberalism is a mental illness" threads. They've been done to death, they don't usually satisfy the requirements for an ED thread, and they very quickly degenerate into flamewar.


Now:

How to be a Respected Member of ED Politics



I. Reliability of Information
II. Concision and Grammar
III. Style and Tone
IV. Content
V. Having Manners


I. Reliability of Information

a. When a source is required
b. How many sources are required
c. Which sources to use
d. How to properly cite a source
e. Using the source to your full potential


a. A source is required only when a new piece of information is brought to a thread discussion. A respected ED regular will usually open up a thread with an interesting fact followed by a source that they got the information from.

b. The number of sources required depends largely upon the claim. The claim that Kennedy was never shot will not be respected no matter how many sources you reference. The claim that George W. Bush is presently (6/5/04) the President of the United States of America will generally be accepted without a source required. Generally, only one source is required, but as your claim is less believable, it is wiser to reference more material.

c. Generally respected sources usually end with .gov or sometimes .org. News media is often respected as a source of information, though perhaps accused of shading the truth.

d. Citing a source is most properly done by means of using the URL button or quoting something using the Quote button as follows.
"www.whitehouse.gov"
President Bush on Friday presented the Medal of Freedom to His Holiness Pope John Paul II.


e. When citing a reference, make sure you know what the entire article is about. Many times an article will be used for one specific fact mentioned in it despite the contrary messages the rest of the article gives.

II. Concision and Grammar
a. Grammar
b. Spelling
c. Concision
d. Emoticons
e. Word Porcessing Program


a. Grammar is not always necessary when trying to prove a point, but many times the point of a post will be lost because it is impossible to understand. Respected Gaians understand the importance of being understood and write in a manner that is intelligible.

b. Spelling is far less important than grammar, but if one misspells words too often, their posts are overlooked due to difficulty to read. Respected Gaians will not trash another for their spelling, but will be careful not to make too many typographical errors or other misspellings.

c. Concision is beautiful. A post need not be five pages long to get the desired message across. Reiteration is generally viewed as redundant and unnecessary. A five-page post is perfectly acceptable assuming that there is no repetition of information.

d. Emoticons can not express how you are feeling as well as words can. While you may have good intentions when using the rolleyes emoticon, the image gives negative connotations. Personally, I like the emoticons, but people will have a tougher time respecting you when your posts are littered with them. Use them only when you truly feel they express what you are feeling.

e. If you know you can't spell, but want to post, and want people to not look down on you for spelling or grammatical errors, open up a Word Processing Program and Spellcheck/Grammarcheck your post and then copy/paste into the message box.

III. Style and Tone
a. Respect
b. Flames
c. Sarcasm
d. Avatars
e. Profanity


a. It is always important to respect other Gaians if one desires to be respected. A degree of accepting other people's stances and when they are correct is key to being a respected Gaian. Many Gaians choose to believe that other Gaian's beliefs are 'stupid' and will claim as such leading to their own lack of respect, and the next point.

b. Flaming people may help you feel better about yourself, but will only anger the posting you have flamed and make them more inclined to disagree with your beliefs. Said flames also deter outsiders from wanting to agree with you, in the long run, hurting your goal. A certain level of heated conversation is acceptable, even expected; but there is never a need to cuss someone out and insult/threaten them.

c. Sarcasm is a tricky style to master, and even trickier over the Internet. Sarcasm is often misinterpreted and even shunned by many who do not understand it. Sarcasm does not hold well in political debates in general as it does not help to introduce any new fact so much as insult the belief of somebody else. Sarcasm can only be used to humor oneself and those who share their beliefs. Beyond that point, it is useless.

d. For some reason, many people judge the quality of posts based on somebody's avatar. This is ridiculous. It is most proper to ignore a person's avatar and focus on their post (even if they are wearing flame clothes).

e. Used with taste, profanity can express how passionate you feel about a certain topic. Used too often, profanity leads to the general consent that a poster is ignorant, or worse.

IV. Content
a. One-liners
b. Relevance


a. To earn respect among Gaians, one should tned to avoid contributing a post that raises no new information to the post. These "one-liners" prove nothing and make other Gaians resentful of the poster and their post. Avoid letting adages like "Love is love" and "Love it or leave it" be your entire post. In addition to being unproductive in a conversation or debate, these posts are often removed by moderators and their posters may be warned/banned (based upon moderator discretion). More about One-liners and argumentum ad hominem.

b. Speak to the topic and not to the speaker. A person might not believe what they are saying, so to prove them wrong does little. To prove their arguement wrong is much more commendable. Avoid talking about people's grammar, spelling, clothes, political background, personal beliefs. Talk about the topic.

V. Having manners
a. Don't Whine
b. Guilt by association


a. It's admittedly annoying to see new pointless Bush threads pop up three times a day, but rather than pointing it out in the thread, effectively keeping the thread alive longer by inadvertedly 'bumping' it, it is wiser to seek out a moderator and report the thread to them.

b. Guilt by association isn't fun, but it exists. If you are part of a guild or club, bear in mind that all actions you perform reflect on your guild. Like, if I were to go completely crazy and start bashing every new person who came in here, the ED Politics Regulars Guild might lose some validity,

How to Start an Excellent ThreadCourtesy of Kurd Jam

I. Title
II. Introduction
III. Body
IV. Conclusion



I.- Title

Specificity is the key to making a proper title to a thread. The more specific you are, the more likely people will respond to your thread in a positive manner. Witty titles are also very important. Even if someone doesn’t normally talk about Gun Control, a thread title like “Oops, gun control really is stupid after all” will entice that Gaian to enter the thread.

II.- Introduction.
By writing a good introductory passage you may be able to catch the attention of a bigger number of Gaians, which later will result in a wider variety of views reflected in your thread and that may benefit the course of the debate. biggrin

It's recommended that the first (few) paragraph(s) of the thread serve(s) an introductory purpose, this way readers will have a vague idea of the issue that is brought to debate, and by doing so you will have already made a selection amongst the potential participants in a future discussion. Again, specificity is your friend; use it freely.

A well-written introductory passage will reduce part of the hostility that sometimes arises from people who feel they have been misled about the subject of the thread and may consequently torch the topic and the person who created it.

Two great things are accomplished by writing a well-thought out introduction; you start a good debate, and you help decrease flaming by just writing one decent paragraph of text.

III.- Plot of the thread

Here's where a poster must explain, using the clearest terms possible, the matter that has to be debated later by the rest of Gaians that may enter the thread.

Separating ideas in paragraphs is a must-do-thing that helps the reading and comprehension of the original poster's ideas. Big long blocks of text often deter conversation from the actual point of the debate.

Have in mind there's no limit to the paragraphs needed to get your point across; if you can do it in a few paragraphs then it's perfect, lengthy posts will have scarce replies but they are most likely to be from people that are really interested in the subject, so the size of the post would be determined by your intentions when creating the thread.

Reminder : A good and brief post is good, but a reading bad and lengthy post is a chore,, and also bear in mind the one-line rule,

Proper punctuation, capitalization and spelling are important things that should also be taken into consideration, for they will make the reading of the post less of an eye torturing experience. Have in mind we are in an online forum, your writing speaks for yourself, Zo iT'S nOt dAt HArt tO GuEsZs ThE ImPREsiOn Ur GivIN WEn TiPYng LIkE Dis !!

Use sources whenever it's required ( and given the nature of this subforum, that will be quite often ). Personal experiences generally don’t make a good standing point, so internet links from reliable sources, like the ones listed in this sticky, are good to cite.

Here are some links that may help you create a good argument:

Guide to logical fallacies
Online dictionary and thesaurus
Spell checker

IV.- Conclusion

Here's where the posters personal opinion regarding the subject of the thread should appear. All evidence should have already been stated, and massive conclusions are unnecessary. A couple paragraphs as a maximum should suffice to give the author's personal impression on the subject that will be debated.


Things to have in mind :

1. By following this guide, the success of your threads is not granted, however, we grant you that by following this advice your threads will be formally excellent.

2. You may still get flames despite following this guide, but don't let trolls and flamers put you down; ignore their comments and report them to an online mod immediately.

3. Although your thread is well presented, that doesn't guarantee that you are right.


Generally good stuff to know about Gaia not specific to politics.-Includes all the vocabulary that may be confusing along with how to use quotes and stuff like that.*

* This paragraph originally linked to a short explanantion on how to use the different posting options this forum offers. This was done way before the site's appearance was revamped, therefore the link in it does no longer work. With the new layout it's pretty easy to guess how to use them, however a quick guide could be added to the sticky if needed.
 
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
Post: 2503204_2 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:40 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:40 am
 
(Stolen from Skandranon Rashkae's thread.)
(HEAVILY edited)

A guide to important threads in the forum

These are the links to the guilds representing the main political ideologies. If you have any others including third parties I would be happy to add them.
Update zee guild links, Bolthorman. Don't forget the NCS, Libertarian, Anarchist, and Nazi guilds that've appeared since thread-using days. Guilds dedicated to actual comprehensive political ideologies follow:

Liberal Gaians for Intelligent Political discussion (LGfIPD)

Razak's Roughnecks: The Leaning Right Guild

NCS, Neocommunism, Communism, and Socialism Guild

The Libertarian Guild

United League of Anarchists

Gaia Nazi Guild
Still under construction!

NEWS SOURCES :


ABC News
Al Jazeera (Mid East)
Ananova
Arab News (Mid East)
Asia News Net
Asia Times
Associated Press
BBC
Bloomberg
CBC (Canada)
CBSNews
CNEWS (Canada)
Chicago tribune
China Daily (China)
Economist.com
CNN
El Pais (Spain)
Environmental News Network
Financial Times
Reuters
Hindustan Times (India)
Independent.co.uk (UK)
Sydney Morning Herald
Japan Today
WN Africa (Africa)
South America Daily
Asia news net
Washington Post
New York Times
Korea Herald (S. Korea)
Le Monde (France)
Los Angeles Times
NEWS.com.au (Australia)
Palestine Chronicle (Palestine)
Pravda (Russia)
SBS World News
Singapore Window (Singapore)
Straits Times (Singapore)
Sky World News
Slashdot (Tech News)
SwissInfo News (Switzerland)
The Times of India (India)
Times Online (UK)
Yahoo! News
Pravda
World News Network
The Age
Ha'aretz
The Guardian


* Some of the sites above require registration, but don't worry, it's free *

DOCUMENTATION AND OTHER SOURCES :

Geneva convention
Index of contents of the United Nations site, includes charts, declarations, etc...
C.I.A. World Factbook
U.S.A. constitution
NATO
North American Trade Agreement
Free Trade of the Americas
World Trade Organization documents
The G8
Summit of the Americas
European Union
Religious Tolerance
SpinSanity*
Library of Congress
Legislative Information
I'll add more stuff as we go.

Edit by Kurd Jam:
Spinsanity is no longer updated, but their archive is still up. The editors have their own respective sites now :

- http://www.bryankeefer.com
- http://www.brendan-nyhan.com
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
Post: 2503204_3 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:43 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:43 am
Beware of using easily refutable and untrustworthy news sites such as Newsmax or PrisonPlanet. Some sources are just worthless.
 
     
Post: 2503204_4 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:55 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:55 am
 
Or Biased Media, Like Fox and Subsidaries. blaugh

But good job on the guidelines, hopefully it'll crack down on some of the "emotion posters" who post on the basis of inciting a response, or just trashing someone. I'd make sure to highlight that in the guidelines.
     
Post: 2503204_5 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:59 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:59 am
Biased media may exclude some truths, but rarely prints lies. There are some sites that are just useless, but I have not the time to compile a list of useless websites. I do believe my head would explode in the process.
 
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
Post: 2503204_6 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:02 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:02 am
 
"Bolthorman"
Biased media may exclude some truths, but rarely prints lies. There are some sites that are just useless, but I have not the time to compile a list of useless websites. I do believe my head would explode in the process.


Libel is not something any news media source wants to slapped with.

But the internet changes the game and allows for sites dedicated to manipulating the truth to get away with far more than they'd ever be allowed to do in a major publication. xp
     
Post: 2503204_7 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:02 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:02 am
Lol... They do print lies, but more often than not, its in tv or books. But you dont really need a media list. Anyone who's trying to make a point should already know how to get sources. sweatdrop

Haha, read you should read Treason. cover to cover lies.
 
     
Post: 2503204_8 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:09 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:09 am
 
"Greyfoxlinux"
Lol... They do print lies, but more often than not, its in tv or books. But you dont really need a media list. Anyone who's trying to make a point should already know how to get sources. sweatdrop

Haha, read you should read Treason. cover to cover lies.
I have never read Treason... Why should I read something that is cover-to-cover lies?
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
Post: 2503204_9 created on Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:15 amPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 8:15 am
"Dakai"
Libel is not something any news media source wants to slapped with.

But the internet changes the game and allows for sites dedicated to manipulating the truth to get away with far more than they'd ever be allowed to do in a major publication. xp


Heh .. like FOMG! TENET FIRED CUZ OF PLOT TO ASSASSINATE TEH BUSH!!1
 
     
 
"Bolthorman"
"Greyfoxlinux"
Lol... They do print lies, but more often than not, its in tv or books. But you dont really need a media list. Anyone who's trying to make a point should already know how to get sources. sweatdrop

Haha, read you should read Treason. cover to cover lies.
I have never read Treason... Why should I read something that is cover-to-cover lies?


It's actually a pretty funny read. Coulter has some interesting takes on history.

As far as lies? Even Coulter falls short of making bold faced lies most of the time. Libel suits can ruin careers if they make it through the courts.

Just be sure to have some antacid ready when yousit down to read Coulter. wink

Me, I'm a fan of www.spinsanity.org Ilpalazza introduced me to them early on and I've been hooked on the site ever since.
     
"Duchess Ilpalazza"
"Dakai"
Libel is not something any news media source wants to slapped with.

But the internet changes the game and allows for sites dedicated to manipulating the truth to get away with far more than they'd ever be allowed to do in a major publication. xp


Heh .. like FOMG! TENET FIRED CUZ OF PLOT TO ASSASSINATE TEH BUSH!!1
Very little on Gaia has actually caused me to literally laugh out loud. Thank you for that.
 
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
 
"Wouley"

Me, I'm a fan of www.spinsanity.org Ilpalazza introduced me to them early on and I've been hooked on the site ever since.
That site could prove to be quite addictive indeed.
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
Its always a good thing, to have an insight into the conservative mind. Follow the biased media, it allows you to debate your own points more effectively. smile
 
     
 
I am one of those on-the-fence people. I need no help understanding the conservative point of view. I will not read something just to antagonize someone.
     
If you only live for today, then tomorrow will never be any better.

Cowhide Santa Hat x 522 and growing
its not to antagonize them. It can provide valuable insight into where they're coming from; and why they might cite a specific reason for something. Its not specifically digging for things to hurt them with; its strengthening your own arguments. Most of the conservative posters only bother to look at their side of the issue; not fact check; and write bigoted biased posts. A large majority of them only bother to use what information they obtain via word of mouth, and not trace points back to the arguments. A great source of truly unbiased information is lexisnexus, btw.
 
     
1 2 3 ... 17 18 19 >