sunaipaa
stalebsicuit
sunaipaa
stalebsicuit
hhhmmmm
that is not a breach of first amendment
due to the fact that it is state money and not private money being used
but anwya i think its doumb for the most part
of course it's a breach! Doesn't anyone teach you people First Amendment law?
eek
The Bill of Rights was designed to protect people from the government...last I checked, states are part of the government. Therefore, the First Amendment guarantees our rights against whatever measures they might take to infringe.
If it were private,
then it wouldn't be a breach of the First Amendment. You switched your cases around there.
WHAT?
dude read the thing
it says FEDERAL FUNDED meaning that the goverment is paying for it
now if there was a private citizen or citizens who were doing this, then the goverment doesnt have a say unless its going to state facilities, like schools
its like this
the goverment pays for public school text-books, so they get a say of waht goes in them, right?
if a citizen wants to donate to the library the local authoritews need to check if it is appropriate and if it isnt, then they dont allow it
if a private citizen wants to add it to a private collection, and the goverment breaches it then, then it would brake first amendment
its like going into the IRS building and start preaching your religion, in federal buildings,t hey have tight regulations on this sort of thing, if they stop ypu they dont brake your right to free speech do they?
I know the government is paying for it you a**. Why don't you read what I said? The government has no right to censor literature simply because it contains homosexual material.
I've seen you up here before, and bluntly, you need a crash-course in American government. Particularly regarding the Constitution...
And as far as your regulations are concerned, yes they do. Public forums are generally the place to preach ideas, but written material is treated differently.
your an idiot
of course they have every right to, its their ******** money they are using
if most of the people in the us see homosexuality in literature to be a bad thing, then the govemrent being a representative body of the people will discontinue its funding for that literature, they arent censoring it so much as nehglecting it, they dont care, and they arent going to pay fopr it anymore, they arent saying "you cant have this in the library anymore" they are saying "you can have it, but dont expect us to pay for it"
i dont agree iwht it either to much, but why doesnt the goverment put in money for books that are about hitler and how great he was? or about how communism was good or bad? what about religous books?
its a diffrent persepctive, ne could say that by not allowing mien kampf into the library you are censoring it, are you not?
in othewr words this si a subjective topic and depending on what group you belong to it can be viewed good or bad, my opinion, the federal goverment can fund books of its choosing, just so long as they dont ban the books from the library, the books can still go into the library, but they arent going to get there thrugh the federal goverment
