Latrans
Why... would it matter?
Don't people breed rats with different goals in mind? There's no hivemind for breeding rats, right?
I wouldn't want natural rats--I'd want placid domesticated ones that never bit me. That's what I'd breed for.
Sorry, you must be a newb to the forum. When it comes to animals there is only one right way. Just in case anyone is confused, my way is the right way.
dramallama
I'm with you though. I value my delicate fingers. I need them for typing so I prefer to avoid gushing wounds.
Thinking of this in terms of dogs, I can't imagine having to deal with an aggressive animal that large, even though I'm sure maternal aggression would be very natural for their ancestors. I'm sure there are dogs that display it, but then there are plenty of females who through good selective breeding would never raise a lip at their owner, pups or no pups. Similarly there are some dogs who have never met a stranger and would not bat an eye even if said stranger came over and started playing with their pups. It all depends on what you are looking for. This is one of the nice things about there being a lot of different breeders out there. Lots of choices to choose from.
The so called 'real version' of a nasty rat ApolloRouge mentions would be perfectly reasonable behavior for a wild rat. It would be a natural behavior of a small, cornered rat trying to survive. Still a lot of people don't like that and choose to cull such aggressive individuals from their lines. If it is possible to breed out one form of aggression I don't understand why a person wouldn't theoretically be able to breed out another variant of it?