I like that you have two really strong images here, in the woods and the storm. However, the poem kind of hits you over the head with them, doesn't it? Having four couplets in ten lines go "woods"/"storm" gives you no escape from the images to enjoy them. Plus, the lines "It’s not the woods for me" and "So not the woods" are really similar - given how short the poem is, it's best to avoid unnecessary repetition as much as possible. It would suffice to introduce the two images in the first couplet, get to the heart of what those images represent in the poem, and then bring them back in the conclusion.
Also, take a look at the following two lines:
yay!
flashes of danger, like surges of light
The first one has bold, visual images, while the second one is just a statement of emotion. It's a lot easier for a reader to connect to the things they can envision, since they get the benefit of your image AND the associated emotion. When you say that you're "terrified"... how terrified? Why are you terrified? Is being terrified worse than being horrified or petrified? Relying on your reader's sense of "terror" is no fun - bring them
into your terror. Give them a reason to be terrified with you.
I'd like to see what more you can do with this one.
3nodding