A Soporific
You can, but you would be wrong. I can define "house" to mean "wood". Of course, the meaning you get out of my words would be totally different than what I'm trying to convey. You have the same case here, misapplying a word with a clear negative connotation when shooting for guilt by association.
Except I provided a definition.
Accusing me of trying to use guilt by association is ridiculous, since I have already stated that I consider the indoctrination of children the moral equivalent of brainwashing.
Quote:
I fail to see how this differs to political group, socialization, and ethics when it comes to "child indoctrination". You might consider it immoral, but wouldn't that be just because you disagree with the subject or take incredibly extreme examples as representative.
No. Any indoctrination of children is immoral. Which is why I despise the public school system of my country. Under the current government the sole focus has become to teach children
what we know, forgetting the rather important subject of
how we know it. I consider that borderline, if not outright, indoctrination. Doesn't matter that what they are taught is likely to be true.
Quote:
And this is repersentative how?
I'm pretty sure I stated that it happens "often", or something to that effect. The Jesus Camp example alone in my opinion means that it happens much too often, but that is of course not an isolated case.
Quote:
So, everything anyone tries to do at any point is now the reason they are paid? So I assume that I am paid by the Board of Elections to drink and party because I do so on occasion?
So you are claiming that "saving" people is not one of the main duties of Christian priests?