-Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden
zeffers
-Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden
zeffers
-Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden
zeffers
I don't mind being placed under a label of being a, "bad Christian" because I am vehemently against homosexuality, and any activity in which homosexuality may occur. The judgment of other people really has no bearing on my life. As if a person has the right position to judge over someone like myself, because they are so correct in every action they partake, right...
Why are you against homosexuality? You know it's not a sin right?
Why is homosexuality not a sin?
Why should it be a sin? Why is being who you are such a bad thing?
So a question for you, is it bad for a ***** to have sex with children? Yet, if it is, then if he claims it's just who he is, then why is it bad? Accordingly, to your statement, the same logic would apply, no? And thus, shouldn't we then pass a law to allow ***** to do as they please, and if the child consents, then I suppose it's ok, yes? Wait, we have laws that seem to discriminate against *****, hmm. We ought to change that, like we have for homosexuals who are now allowed to marry in some states, shouldn't we then?
Hmm, wait a second, that's sexual immorality, and disgusting, and unacceptable, no? hmm.
Actually the western definition of what a ***** is skewed by the media. The word ***** means someone who likes kids, it doesn't neccessarily mean they want to have sex with them. Look at the word bibliophile, it means someone who likes books. Does it mean a bibliophile wants to have sex with books, ummm no. (poor example but you get the jist.)
There is the age of consent law. It basically allows teens from 14-18 to consent to sex or sexual acts. In certain states 15 is legal, in others 17. If the law states that teenagers 14-18 are able to consent to sex, then it is legal, no? Regardless of what other might say? The law is the law. There is no refuting this. :3 You may not agree with it, but it doesn't make it illegal.
Homosexuality isn't the only thing that's sexually immoral nor is sodomy a homosexual only thing. There are many straight couples that love to do sodomy. Shouldn't you yell at them on how it's immoral for them to practice sodomy? Shouldn't you yell at those who practice bestiality? Don't you practice sodomy with your partner? If so, then you have no reason to complain. The point of the matter is, what a person does in their bedroom is none of your concern. :3
The definition of the term, isn't really the point I was making. The actions were, you may say that the term, "gay" was not in origin used to describe homosexuals, but to be happy. Well, I could have said gay, in regards to homosexuals. I am not trying to discuss over semantics or misunderstandings of the definitions of words, and the method by which they are applied.
So would you find the law is final authority? The finite law of this country, or on the local level of each specific state? So, the law should be the final definitive line for your decision making in accordance with your ethical standards, or morals? A fallible law produced from fallible men can only be fallible, and thus with flaws. So, it's important to not simply accept that such, "insert law here" is the law, so that's it, and I accept it just because the state, or government says so.
I commit no sodomy with anybody, and actually I commit no sexual activity, not until I am married.
smile Though that's not really relevant.
I am not trying to yell at anybody, I am making a point that I remain against homosexuality, and stand in regard that such does not concern me if such is going to place or a label of being a bad christian, when I'm walking in a living understanding, with no doubt, fear, or operation of lack in my life, then keep on calling me a bad christian, because God will always make my way prosperous.
smile
So, it really has no mark on my life, because greater is He that's in me, than he that is in the world.
smile
