comfortably_dumb
Elf Lord Chiewn
comfortably_dumb
Elf Lord Chiewn
IAccidentlyTheFleshlight
✖✖✖ IAccidentlyTheFleshlight ✖✖✖
Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Says Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ
-----------------------------♥----------------------------
How is me being against Gay Marriage make me a bad Christian/Person?
Don't get me wrong I'm not against them one bit, But I do think Marriage is a constitution between one male & one female.
Basically, you're seeking to disallow legal rights based on some kind of pseudo-religious nonsense. Marriage never was restricted to one male and one female. Not biblically, certainly.
Why should a fallacious appeal to religion negatively impact the very secular legality of marriage?
Is homosexual marriage in the Bible as being good? No? I didn't think so.
When God created Adam and Eve, were they man and woman? Yes? I thought so.
When He created Adam, did he say that man should not be alone, so he specifically created a woman, not another man? Yes? I thought so.
Did God say it was good? Yes? In fact, He said it was very good. I thought so.
Heterosexual marriage is biblical only.
...what?
You're not even making proper sense in order to construct the fallacious argument I think you're attempting to make.
Where in the Bible does it say that homosexual marriage is, you know, biblical? I'd like a verse, please, because you do say it's biblical.
Ur, no.
You're missing the point of this thread, and frankly, you're missing a huge chunk of what should be a major understanding of the canon.
This makes roughly as much sense as claiming that computers should be outlawed, since I don't see where they are biblical.
Problems with this include the following:
1. In a revealed law, the illegal is clearly defined or it does not exist, particularly if one is to believe that Yeshua died for any kind of larger purpose than as an example.
2. God decided to give the man a helper since man was alone, failed to create a proper instance of one, and then created a woman. Even if this weren't a mythical account, that doesn't say much for some kind of amazing plan from the beginning for the two of them to hook up as some sort of prototypical example to everyone else ever, OMG.
3. It's important to note that ishshah is repeatedly translated as both "woman" and "wife" within Genesis, without any kind of actual distinction. I'm not convinced that it is supportable to assume that they were automatically 'married' in any kind of contemporary sense because they were of the same flesh, or to assume much of anything, really. All that Genesis 2:24 actually says is that a man will leave his father and mother, stay with (cling to) a woman, and that they will come to exist as one. It should also be noted that this same terminology is used to describe men who are close to one another (as figurative brothers) and literal relatives of any sex.
4. Computers, like same-sex marriage, do absolutely no damage to the religion or the people, and there is no reasonable, supportable argument that they should be disallowed.
5. In a secular country with secular laws affecting people of various creeds, there is no reason to so much as insinuate that because something does not appear in the bible, it should be outlawed. This goes against standards clearly set forth in the bible, as well as being completely absurd.
comfortably_dumb
And about Adam and Eve -- God created Adam first, yes? God said that it was not right for Adam to be alone, so God created Eve for Adam. God didn't create a man for Adam, but a woman. Furthermore, God said that it was very good... as in the new relationship between a man and a woman. We were created for relationship, and this being between one man and one woman as seen in Genesis.
Bunk.
Ignoring the obvious issues with applying what God is supposed to have done in one specific mythical instance to everything else, ever: if you believe this, logic dictates that you must denounce the life of Paul and every other person ever who did not find a woman and have a similar relationship.
Perhaps you should denounce David or Solomon, who had multiple wives (also not exactly similar to the account in Genesis), or those who are not listed as having had wives.
