Weretindere
This entire thing is based off of deciphering a platitude into arguing semantics over what makes someone "decent" and turning it into a PC argument of "oh no, someone called someone a piece of s**t" while subsequently shifting the goalposts into an argument which disregards the concept of being "rewarded" and claiming another semantics argument of what it means to be "religious".
As far as what the claim provided is stating, I will state the expectancy of Heaven, while being insufferable assholes on the internet, is an expectancy only the greedy and prideful with convoluted visions of self-grandeur will defend. I'm also not living in a Utopian fairy-tale-land that believes "Heaven" is a just reward for any amount of good deed that I ever do, because I'd rather life on earth than heaven, and I'd rather feel the rage that comes with trying to read moron's responses while defending their 'community's' feel-good, confessional hug-boxes of sheltering and smothering than to be placed in such a setting.
Also, replace "piece of s**t" with "coward"; it flame-baits better.
Top Kek
People often have a tendency to derail the intended discussion.
sweatdrop But no, the color of my glasses are not a nice shade of rose. However, I often yearn for a world where people do the right thing just because it's the right thing to do, rather than expecting to get something out of it.
