The Legendary Guest
trajik007
I hope this has already been said, but I'm not going through six more pages to find out. I can give my whole argument in two definitions. First, in debate, it is always necessary to define what you mean. In doing so, I hope it clears a little something up.
"a·the·ism
ˈāTHēˌizəm/
noun
noun: atheism
disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
synonyms: nonbelief, disbelief, unbelief, irreligion, skepticism, doubt, agnosticism;
nihilism"
"ag·nos·tic
aɡˈnästik/
noun
noun: agnostic; plural noun: agnostics
1.
a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.
synonyms: skeptic, doubter, doubting Thomas, cynic"
While the two are closely related, they by no way mean the same. So therefore it is possibly to be a faithful person without prescribing to any already existing religious or spiritual movement.
First, I reject both of your definitions. Disbelief implies the rejection or refusal to accept that which is actually demonstrably true. The existence of gods is not demonstrably true. It is not possible to believe yet not believe at the same time. These are two mutually exclusive states of being.
Next, you need to explain what you mean by "faith" because a person who lacks religious faith cannot have it and yet not at the same time.
Sources for first definitions:
1 and
2.
I define faith as the one used in the first example here:
"faith
fāTH/
noun
noun: faith
1.
complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
"this restores one's faith in politicians"
synonyms: trust, belief, confidence, conviction; More
optimism, hopefulness, hope
antonyms: mistrust
2.
strong belief in God or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.
synonyms: religion, church, sect, denomination, (religious) persuasion, (religious) belief, ideology, creed, teaching, doctrine"
...For which the source is
this.