Herald of Famine
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 11:09:45 +0000
il-Lashtavar
Extraordinary Gentleman
il-Lashtavar
Extraordinary Gentleman
il-Lashtavar
Is someone offering you a Prius if you demonstrate your liberal values?
You're not accepting religious beliefs--you're tolerating them to be nonconfrontational. With the pretext that you believe in science, assumption being the two are logically comparable.
I would go on (faith vs experimentation and whatnot), but I don't feel like I need to do so.
"You believe in something (that I disagree with, mind you)? Good for youuuuu"
a**.
You're not accepting religious beliefs--you're tolerating them to be nonconfrontational. With the pretext that you believe in science, assumption being the two are logically comparable.
I would go on (faith vs experimentation and whatnot), but I don't feel like I need to do so.
"You believe in something (that I disagree with, mind you)? Good for youuuuu"
a**.
You need to relax, kid.
This is a discussion about my beliefs in comparison to yours.
You're judging me for believing in evolution.
God have mercy on you, sinner.
Comparing your beliefs to mine, I see that you thing the two things compare. That's not acceptance; that's stupid. Religion and 'Scientific Theories' don't compare anymore than Aesop Fables and National Geographic.
Your religious views aren't any different than mine. You're just representing them in a way that's far more condescending than your realize.
Sentence one: Religions are wrong because science.
Sentence two: but you can believe what you want, despite that it's stupid.
I can continue to explain how this is a rude point of view if you want me to.
Mostly, I just hate to see this kind of ugly pretension. It wouldn't be any better if you were religious.
But, you're mad as ********.
On the internet.
But when I wake up, I'll be sober and this thread will still be pretentious.
Churchill did it better.