Northawke_rs
vacant dream
Some people want to believe that their God is good and kind and all forgiving,as it says in their Bible they have never read, and follow only what they like of Jesus' tennants and then say they are Christians.
People can go completely against what the Qur'an, and still all them selves Muslim.
That doesn't make it true, accurate or right.
She can call herself a turnip, but that will not make her a turnip, nor will it make turnips warm-blooded bipeds.
There's Fandom and there's Religion.
Guess where really liking the concept of a deity falls.
Further, to disrespect a deity's pantheon and contextual culture disrespects that deity.
This used to be known as blasphemy.
It's akin to taking a crap on the beliefs.
So the OP is a fan of Loki and is moved by the idea of someone she doesn't believe in.
Is this religion?
Organized faith?
faith at all?
No.
It is fandom
And not terribly insightful of respectful fandom at that.
To not acknowledge Loki's place in the Aesir, his importance in the Aesir, how he became part of the Aesir, and all that he is is a disservice to him. It belittles him, all that he is and all that he stands for.
Unless, of course she doesn't mean the great Trickster of the Aesir. True, she could mean some
other Loki, some stand alone monotheistic Loki deity completely unrelated- who, being a singular deity would then be a creator deity by default, and not in the archetype of trickster.....
Then it's still fandom, but not a crap on a entire belief system , just liking an idea that she made up one day
It's actually what happens within religion on a daily basis. The Christians had several councils in ancient times just to determine what properties Jesus had. Some of them didn't agree with others and it became a huge mess. The Eastern Orthodox and Western churches couldn't even agree on the existence of the holy trinity. I assume you still consider both of them religious? Your reaction has more to do with your own opinion of Loki (and that's fine by me) than with an actual standard in religion. She's not a Lokean by your definition, okay. She might not even be a Lokean by any narrow definition as has been given. That does not mean that she can't be a Lokean by her own definition. That might mean nothing to others, but it might mean quite a bit for her own religious experience and it is quite common within any type of religions. This is how subsects start. If she gets more people to agree with her definition, eventually it will not be a blasphemy anymore, but a new standard.
Anyways, I'm merely illustrating the flexibility of religion. I had no intention to insult anyone by disputing their definition of their own religion.
As I have said. She can call her self a turnip, but that will not make her one nor will it change what a turnip is.
She has said that she DOESN'T HAVE BELIEF
So nope. Not a religion in faith or belief
She's making up who and what Loki is, if not recognizing Loki as part of the Aesir ans is solitary in her doing this so it's not religion in terms of pure social convention
It's writing a fan fiction and lighting a proverbial candle to it and asking if she should light a literal one.
It can have personal spiritual value to her to say " I like ________ a whole lot and it inspires me"
(fill in the blank with Loki, the color black, Morrissey, black nail polish, Harry Potter, Vampires, pie, etc..) but that doesn't make it a religion
People are inspired by a lot of things. Comic books, video games, the color blue, the smell of orchids, etc.
They can even think about them a lot and admire the characteristics and values of, say, the Justice League, and even try to emulate them while drawing fan art but that won't make it a religion.
Some people aren't religious.
Personally I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
Some people aren't spiritual. Some people aren't religious or spiritual.
why does this bother you?
It kind of reminds me of a conversation I had with this guy who wanted to know if he was gay, after all, he had some friends who were gay and was cool with it, like gay culture, owned Madonna albums and enjoyed musicals.
I asked: are you attracted to men?
answer: no
Do you want a romantic relationship with a man?
answer: no
Okay, your're not gay.
But then he wanted to clarify what if he was a little gay..homosenusal...
Did he want to be sensual with someone of the same gender? no...
Then, was he bi curious?
Was he actually curious? no...
so then he was homotollerant, or homosypathetic right?
WTH? Now, come on, if you're a man and aren't into men, you aren't gay. Time to get over it.
Sure you can make up names to make you feel like you fit in better with the social groups you want to be in but when it comes down to it, if you aren't true to who you are in love or faith, it's just not true.
Not having a religion box to check does not make someone an invalid person...at least not to me