Curious why you believe any of that, Interitum. They sound like comfort-beliefs, like the things you want to believe, and that's a dangerous place to get your beliefs from. I mean if you're interested in explaining things like evolution, then you must be influenced by the secular scientific arguments for evolution, so it's odd that you haven't turned that same reasoning toward the legitimacy of Biblical claims like Jesus as the son of god, or the existence of aliens close enough to have anything to do with us. Nothing that you stated is inherently contradictory, but the reasons for your particular beliefs sound very contradictory, which is a bad sign.
Far as I can tell, you've described a 'religion' that doesn't yet exist as an established faith because it's the kind of personal mish-mash a lot of people have (all the 'Christians' in my family, for example) based on the things they emotionally want to believe in carefully fit around whatever facts that they feel scientifically sure of (because let's face it, you can barely get by in the modern world saying things like 'the earth is the flat centre of the universe' based on the Bible; every Christian I know claims that some of the Bible is inaccurate or 'not applicable').
So it's about as inaccurate a way to figure out actual deeper truths about the universe as I can think of. Just warning you, a bit of rationality and self-critical thinking does everyone some good, in day-to-day life as well as in core beliefs.
Myself, I'm a skeptic and a scientist, because science is the best method of reasoning and understanding the universe that humanity has come up with. For example, scientists only take into account observable data, as much data as they can collect. If something postulated doesn't have an observable influence on the data in any way, the idea is generally disregarded until data is found that does align with it. In this way spirituality has been discarded the same as psychics and magicians, because there is no data that wouldn't be present in the case of much simpler hypotheses. If you'd like me to elaborate further on the competing hypotheses for religion, and why scientists don't see it as necessary to explain anything, or even a likely possibility, I would be happy to.
Similarly, the rationality that drove me towards science also dictates a basic system of ethics that I feel pretty strongly about, based on making my life better while making the world a comfier place for me to live my life (the people around me being happy and stable, the people around them being happy and stable, and so on.) Simple rules like absolute honesty, ready self-criticism and examination, hedonistic utilitarian goals, treating others the way I'd want them to treat me in context, etc. I don't think anything happens when we die because I have no reason to, and I think the universe as we can observe it is pretty goddamn amazing and I want to spend my life discovering it and sharing my happiness with others. That about does it for me.