Lucky~9~Lives
The Stories Never Told
Lucky~9~Lives
The Stories Never Told
Lucky~9~Lives
Because (the existence of) one would exclude the other (from existence).
Not necessarily.
For example, there are plenty of morality standpoints and tidbits that point to a universal and often benevolent truth, but are often hypocritical of the opposite.
Such truths are not necessarily mutually exclusive.
Care to elaborate?
Both "YHVH is everywhere; anyone who says otherwise is ungodly" and "Mother Nature is everywhere; anyone who says otherwise is unnatural" point towards a universal and often benevolent truth, are hypocritical of the opposite, and are not mutually exclusive.
I'm guessing the first bit is Yahweh. I think. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Given, though, that's a bit of a bad example, especially if talking to a transcendentalist. A religious person might adore nature, seeing how the natural world is created by their desired choice of deity(s), or at least influenced by it/them. A nature enthusiast might find inspiration in religious teachings from his or her findings in the outside world.
100
200
200
