Wigwam the Dodo
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:27:36 +0000
R.I.P.resurrection
Can't say it sounds like a big deal because:
1. This only applies to Men Who Have Been Heterosexual. Not bisexual men, homosexual men, polysexual men, asexual men, no other men then hetero men who have had "bad
" experiences with Hetero women.
2. WHO ******** CARES what women, or ANY SEX for that matter, thinks about you? Who the ******** HASN"T been burned by a women or and man, or, i don't, maybe both? more? Personally, a few less-than-positive experiences with a individual, regardless of sex, sexual identity, sexual preference, nationality or religion isn't enough to make me completes renounce a worldwide populace of any of individuals of such things.
3. Why is women's "expectations' over men so pertinent? What about Men's expectations over Women's? Transgender of cisgender? Homosexual against hetero sexual? Bisexual? Asexual? I have a hard time believing this ONBE gender of ONE type of sexual identity and ONE type of sexual orientation is really that much more important than the rest. neutral
4. If these men are so butt hurt that a few individuals who happened to be women feel it was so extreme theory don't need women for the rest of their lives, WHY SHOULD WE CARE? Can't they just noir deal with women and NOT have to excl;aim about it? See, because if you are really done done with women or anything for that matter, WHY WOULD YOU WASTE TIME/ENERGY ON ANYTHING That has to do with them?
" experiences with Hetero women.
2. WHO ******** CARES what women, or ANY SEX for that matter, thinks about you? Who the ******** HASN"T been burned by a women or and man, or, i don't, maybe both? more? Personally, a few less-than-positive experiences with a individual, regardless of sex, sexual identity, sexual preference, nationality or religion isn't enough to make me completes renounce a worldwide populace of any of individuals of such things.
3. Why is women's "expectations' over men so pertinent? What about Men's expectations over Women's? Transgender of cisgender? Homosexual against hetero sexual? Bisexual? Asexual? I have a hard time believing this ONBE gender of ONE type of sexual identity and ONE type of sexual orientation is really that much more important than the rest. neutral
4. If these men are so butt hurt that a few individuals who happened to be women feel it was so extreme theory don't need women for the rest of their lives, WHY SHOULD WE CARE? Can't they just noir deal with women and NOT have to excl;aim about it? See, because if you are really done done with women or anything for that matter, WHY WOULD YOU WASTE TIME/ENERGY ON ANYTHING That has to do with them?
That's not being done, that's just being involved in a different way. If you were done, you wouldn't have to mention it talk2hand
1. Sorry but who gave you the authority to make this claim? Do you speak for gay people? bi people? whateverelse there is? Who elected you as spokesperson? And where did you gain the authority to speak on behalf of mgtow aswell? When did you get to decide to whom it applies? It could even apply to women, you need not take it on it's every face-value word. I'd like to publicly declare you do not get to speak for me, thanks all the same.
2. The 'who cares' argument is completely irrelevant. Clearly, people care. You don't have to like that they care but that's also irrelevant, as whether or not they care is not your call to make.
3. Then stop acting like it is. And it'd be super-cool if also stopped acting like the expectations of the straight man wasn't somehow beneath the rest also. If you don't realize this is what you're doing then here's a hint: Asking questions like why something matters so, and then declaring the answer yourself, or effectively declaring said answer useless or unimportant is how you accomplish this feeling. You want to ask why someone's feelings are more important than someone else's? Then talk to someone declaring their feelings more important, not someone purely declaring their feelings. There IS a difference son.
I'm seeing a pattern with all the why-asking and I'm starting to figure it out. It's o to ask questions ofcourse, encouraged even. But frowned upon to ask so many questions and then try to pretend you know something before being given any answers. Rhetorical questions are useless without a point, and you sure as ******** haven't made any.
Oh and 4. No. Mgtow keep to themselves. They're being talked about here by one not in their number. They are not talking to you, they are not exclaiming at you, so that you think you shouldn't care is as irrelevant as you are yourself. Try talking out of your mouth instead of your a*****e, it really helps.