Godspeed you Juxtaposed
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:34:01 +0000
the minor seventh
Godspeed you Juxtaposed
Adelei Galloway
Godspeed you Juxtaposed
Adelei Galloway
Uh, yeah. An artist friend of mine was freaked out about it, and he did thorough research on it. You can take pictures of children at nude beaches and stuff <_<
once again. in the us under federal law you cannot. even portraying a nude child is illegal. drawings of nude children are illegal as well.
Then we wouldnt be able to display nude baby jesus in our art museums XD
Your mom never took pictures of you when you were in the bath when you were a baby? I guarantee you most mothers have. I guess all of them should be arrested.
A woman artist that live in Virginia, I can't remember her name right now, but she takes nude photos of her children playing in the forest, she hasn't been arrested for it.
Have you ever seen Shin-Chan? He takes his pants off all the time.. why would they air that in the US if you cant have not-perverted nude drawings? What about every cartoon or movie in all of history, where the protagonist is having their first date, and the first thing the mother does is show the girlfriend a picture of him as a baby, running around in his birthday suit?
If you can answer those questions logically, I'll believe you
Why didn't I get a notice for this?
Alright. First off you have two divisions of the law. If one has religious value, a naked idol, it is not considered child pornography.
Secondly, all "obscene" things have to pass a test if they're brought to court as obscene. Most states use the Miller test while we used to use the Hicklin test. They generally have to prove they offer some value to society.
Yes your mother taking pictures of you nude as a child can be considered child pornography and punishable under law. However there is a difference between what is legally wrong and what will be punished in court. Why doesn't Blizzard type World of Warcraft Private Servers and take down all of them and sue them all. Why doesn't Microsoft and Mac go to China and Africa and sue 95% of the people for having pirated software.
Most cartoons and movies that have the mother show sons girlfriend or boyfriend nude picture isn't actually the case.
To be honest I don't have a clue about Shin Chan. Since the show uses a crude drawing style and bad textures they are probably just obfuscating what could be down there thereby getting "legal immunity" from that sort of thing. The non american version of shin chan is much much much more graphic.
As long as the artist doesn't show nude genitalia she won't be able to be tried in court. However the child pornography laws are so deep and confusing that it's possible to convict anyone "bad" on anything. The same way the government can go to war with anyone and have the people be cool with it.
no.
it's only child pornography if it's a child portrayed in a sexually explicit way. that's what pornography means. it's not against the law to have pictures of naked children as long as they do not imply the child is a sex object. though you can still be classed as a ****** and put on a sex offenders list if you have naked pictures of a child and they believe you're using them in a sexually explicit manner.
which once again is what we're talking about. i may have not made it clear enough. if someone is to be tried for child pornography and they possess nude pictures of a child they're going to be arrested and most like convicted by a jury.