Posties The Artificer
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 00:31:05 +0000
I frequently find myself arguing against my points, and others. Many people try to rationalize their fear of arguing under the reuse of instantiating highgrounds, bulverism, adhominem, red herring.
Frosts babblings debunked;
The point of studies is not to abuse syntactical or lexical ambiguity. It is to precise the experiment so it disallows for such fallacies. I've had probably a thousand or two thousand arguments. Let the assumptions begin about how a person thinks I'm arguing from authority because I've argued a lot.
SO LD,
How has arguing played a role in your life?
How many arguments have you had?
Questions?
Frosts babblings debunked;
They didn't assume that because you were white you were therefor being racist. Not only did you lie, you propagated a strawman in the form of "Post hoc, ergo propter hoc."
Now you're goal-post switching from position X(Blacks are not equal to whites) to Y(The black community faces challenges, how do we help?)
Btw, to say "Blacks are not equal to whites." is polysemic and acts influentially on their perception of you with relevence to the statement to remediate the polysemic values. You have a reputation as a retard, and only imbeciles like Tony call you rationale because it fits into their own idealisms as opposed to criteria that precises the meaning of rational.
blacks have lower IQs
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are convicted of more crime
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are considered less attractive
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are less likely to be hired
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are poorer
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are not equal to whites
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
Now you're goal-post switching from position X(Blacks are not equal to whites) to Y(The black community faces challenges, how do we help?)
Btw, to say "Blacks are not equal to whites." is polysemic and acts influentially on their perception of you with relevence to the statement to remediate the polysemic values. You have a reputation as a retard, and only imbeciles like Tony call you rationale because it fits into their own idealisms as opposed to criteria that precises the meaning of rational.
blacks have lower IQs
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are convicted of more crime
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are considered less attractive
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are less likely to be hired
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are poorer
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
blacks are not equal to whites
Begging the question, proof by assertion.
The point of studies is not to abuse syntactical or lexical ambiguity. It is to precise the experiment so it disallows for such fallacies. I've had probably a thousand or two thousand arguments. Let the assumptions begin about how a person thinks I'm arguing from authority because I've argued a lot.
SO LD,
How has arguing played a role in your life?
How many arguments have you had?
Questions?