Rhianna
Unlike You
It brings up alot of questions about society and what we consider life to actually be, as well as expressing extreme anxieties about what feminity is.
I'd love for you to explain this to me in depth, because to me it reeks of the same bullshit where people said that the Blair Witch Movie would be an "in depth look at life and a quality piece about Hollywood's over-glamorized and overproduced movies." instead of what it was -- a C-pile piece of crap with bad acting and a rightfully low budget.
The exhibit, had it been real, only brings up questions about this woman's sanity and what possible laws she might have broken or how she should be punished for being so ridiculously stupid and selfish.
It's pretty much held, pro-choice or pro-life, that we understand what "life" is. How highly that life is held or definitions on "personhood" vary more but most people, even the hardcore prochoice understand that a fetus is technically "alive", for that matter, so is the bacteria in the snot you blow out during a cold, the ants you step on and the bacteria in the vaginal discharge in your panties.
Extreme anxieties about femininity? Hardly. Being a douche who abuses various systems is hardly raising issues about femininity, except giving many women a bad name.
In my opinion such work as was described by the intitial interview; her filming of her herbal abortions and miscarriages in the bath is deeply visual to what the physical body undergoes during such an ordeal and what the psyche expeirences as a result. It raises the question of whether it is abortion should be socially acceptable or not; at this moment in time although not everyone is pro-life it isn't something that when talked about necessarily shocks them; in a sense as humans we have become desensitised to what essentially is a form murder. This leads to my point about what is considered to be an individual or not. Theres been decades of controversy on exactly when an embyro, fetus or even a zygote can actually be considered to be a conscious human. The article itself, correct me if i'm mistaken, didn't actually state how long each pregnancy lasted and so even if we go along with what is scientifically considered an acceptable age for a human life to consciously form, which i believe is 24 weeks, then she may be questioning these boundaries as well. It's also interesting to note that a pregnancy is actually a parasite which is feeding from her body and could not survive without her, and that through these films she could be expressing the need to expel the foriegn object from her body. Which is something that when it concerns a usual parasite, for example a form of worm, we wouldn't think twice about removing. It brings the grotesque quality of being in a metaphorical sense eaten alive. Imagine the huge metre worms that can live inside the human digestive system; maybe she is comparing the imagery of having a pregnancy to that? In a metaphorical sense it could be compared to a tumour.
It brings up the issue of feminity as the body undergoes both hormonal and physical changes during pregnancy. The female is sensitive to the fact that there is something which is not essentially a part of her living in her body. The female is also sensitive to the fact that her sexual organs are changing; her womb is expanding and her breasts in later pregnancy will eventually swell. The very essence of her feminity and her self confidence as a woman comes from her physical appearence and the manner in which she perceives it. In a society where the pressure to lose weight is causing eating disorders to appear glamarous, how will the woman respond to her body shape changing? The hormones will make the woman emotionally vulnerable on what is already a sensitive topic. Although the pregnancy is technically a parasite, she expeirences motherly instincts towards it.
I've explained my view on the subject as best as i can this late at night. I can't comment on the blair witch project because i have not seen the film or heard the criticism.
I would argue that just because someone has an interest in the subject of abortion to the point where they are willing to experiment on it doesn't make them necessarily mentally ill. Alot of journalists are willing to perform extreme experiments in order to get their view on the subject across, for example british television journalist Dawn Porter spent several months on hollywood diets trying to reach size 0 so that she could convey the dangers of anorexia to her audience. Why should something slightly more macabre and equally as potientially dangerous not be considered the same? Unless you have a real passion and strong views for the subject the experiment is on, it is unlikely that you would be able to even sympathise with why someone would put both their psyche and body through something like that.
Has it ever occured to you that the reason the artist would choose to go through abortions and miscarriages is because they believe it is wrong and misused?
I've stated various reasons it does bring feminity into the picture before, and i'll state another one now. it could also be commenting on the traditional role of the female, which is to have a family.
You're looking at the project too literally and with a closed mind. Just because we have technical terms for what 'life' is, doesn't mean the subject isn't open for debate.
I'm not saying that you should like the artwork, just not to disregard it because you feel it was a stupid thing for the artist to do.