Welcome to Gaia! ::

Pseudo-Onkelos's avatar

Adored Admirer

ich-Rawr
Not necessarily. I don't belong to any denomination, I just read the Bible and believe everything it says as all Christians should do. And as I said before, this isn't meant to be offensive...I just believe you're misinformed. Saying "I'm a former Christian" is like saying "I'm a former African-American". You can't change these things about yourself.

I'm not wholly sure what a compatibilist is, so feel free to explain.


Your view is Calvinistic if you truly believe in predestination and think that it is no one's choice but God's to save what you may call the "elect". Your analogy does not work. The former is a religion, the latter is a race. Religion could be compared to philosophy or a political position, but it's nothing like skin color.

A compatibilist is also known as a soft-determinist. It is someone who believes that free will and determinism can coexist. The Stoics, Calvin, Spinoza, and others like Daniel Dennett would be considered compatibilists. Of course, aside from philosophy, I currently do not believe in free will or predestination.
ich-Rawr
Gonecrazy12345
ich-Rawr
"If you do experience this, I would like it if you explained specifically what you mean when you say you experience God. Do you feel certain feelings that you associate with God? Does God communicate to you in some fashion when you pray to him? What exactly is this form of communication? Is it an actual literal voice, or is it something else?"

Well, first of all I'm a Christian.

Second of all, I've heard people say that they've heard or spoke to God several times as well. I can understand that you don't apprehend, and consequently, believe this because...neither do I. For me, it's more so the inner workings and the coming-to-pasts of everything that makes me believe my God is real. For instance, when I follow God and his commandments, although I may encounter pain and suffering, I feel at peace with myself. It's unexplainable in a way. Only those who have this feeling will know what it's like. It's not anything really magical and otherworldly like some people would have you to believe. It's really just assuring. You know that at the end of the day, you'll always be forgiven. You know that, no matter what happens to your physical body, your spiritual body will live on. God "informs" you through the Bible, through nature, through different people and experiences what to do and where to go. I wouldn't say he guides you by the hand and says "Here you go. There you are" but he basically gives you a guilt conscience that lets you know when you're going the right way, and lets you know when you're going the wrong way. I'm not sure, but I figure most people don't have it. At least that's what I was made to believe.


Well yes I don't understand the idea when people say they "experience" and/or "communicate" with God because I'm an atheist and I've always been an atheist. So I personally don't even have the slightest clue of what people mean by that. It's like they're speaking a different language than I am. From experience though, it seems to me that experiencing/communicating with God is an important aspect of many people's belief in God. I've been reading The Bible for a while quite recently, so I'm just trying to understand Christians/Jews/Muslims more, even though people with other religions that have a theistic God can also give me insight into what people exactly mean by what this thread is about.

If I'm understanding you correctly, you don't believe that you communicate with God, however you do experience God in an indirect fashion. You don't directly experience God by his "presence" but you experience God by getting positive results by following his teachings. Is that what you're trying to say?

Well I respect you for trying to understand rather than following the rest of the tide and saying Christians are retarded, insane, and etcetera. In all honesty, Christianity is not for those with weak wills and logical minds. If you are a Christian, many times you will doubt God and you'll lose faith in Him and everyone else. You'll feel hopeless just like others. Don't believe those self-righteous people who claim to be Christians and act like they've got everything together. Christians are people as well. We sin, we fail, we function the same as everyone else. In some cases, we function worse. For instance I am currently suffering from depression, and a hoard of other problems that I don't feel like listing. I haven't prayed or read the Bible in months, yet I still have convictions and I still feel the need to follow God's will. I can tell you...it's very undesirable, but it's also very rewarding.

And in a sense...yes, I do experience God by getting positive results, but not in the way you might be thinking. If I get a million dollars tomorrow, I'll thank God, but that won't make me love him anymore or any less. Many times, it's during hard times that I'll find myself depending on this "imaginary man" as many people call Him. As foolish as I feel talking to the air, it relieves me and keeps me sane. This relief adds to my understanding of a true God. Also, believing in God has caused me to love others more. If I didn't believe in Him, I don't think I'd respect people or bother caring about people since they don't care an inch about me. Sorry my reply is ssoooooo long. As I said before, it's not something easy to explain. It's more so something you just have, and when the time is right, God allows you to put it in the right words.


I wasn't talking about "positive results" in a material sense. I haven't really ever heard Christians/Jews claim that by praying to God, you'll literally become enriched in this world materially. Just as a side note I find that interesting though because this happened over and over again in the Torah, but that has no relevance to this thread, that's for another thread.

I think I was thinking about "positive results" in the sense of getting more joy and more of a sense of appreciation out of your life. I'm being vague, but it's difficult for me to be specific when the very thing I'm trying to understand seems extremely obscure to me.

I didn't think your explanation was long. If you feel comfortable with it, you can explain as long as you like about your experience with God. I'd be happy to read anything you have to say about this topic, it seems to me that I could learn from you. But only do this if you're comfortable with it, if you don't want to talk about it, for whatever reason, I understand.

However I apologize and for the future apologize if I'm slow at responding to your posts. I have to read this stuff multiple times and think about it, and sometimes I feel like after reading someones post, I still don't really have much of a clue about what they're talking about. I'm not going to post something unless I feel like I can actually go somewhere with it.
kvlt elitist
Gonecrazy12345
kvlt elitist
Gonecrazy12345
kvlt elitist


your reading it incorrectly


Okay, then care to elaborate? Or are you just doing the usual thing of going around threads and posting random comments? And I mean that in no animus manner, but I would have liked your post more if you just went with the usual "b*****b" comment.


My sig is a band called Sodom
what i posted is reference to something only a few know and its missing something


Okay, let's just get to the point. Is your post relevant to this thread in any fashion or no? If it is, please fully explain what few of us know, if it isn't, then please stop posting and if you aren't content with that, you can leave by making a post saying "b*****b" or something along that line.


My post been irrelevant to your thread. the whole point of my post is to finish the sentence


Ahh okay, but you do know that Sodom and Gomorrah were cities in Genesis that were destroyed by God right? That's why I found your signature oddly coincidental, because the name "Sodom" is relevant to The Bible and is relevant to the original statement you made. Perhaps that's why the band named itself "Sodom" though idk.
Resonare Praeteriti's avatar

Beloved Sex Symbol

I don't feel the presence of a separate god, rather I feel the power that I possess as a god.

Albeit, in this form it's a rather limited amount, but the human body is only capable of so much. Every bit counts.
ZoMmbiesss's avatar

Bloodsucker

5,900 Points
  • Somebody Likes You 100
  • Generous 100
  • First step to fame 200
Pseudo-Onkelos
ich-Rawr
Not necessarily. I don't belong to any denomination, I just read the Bible and believe everything it says as all Christians should do. And as I said before, this isn't meant to be offensive...I just believe you're misinformed. Saying "I'm a former Christian" is like saying "I'm a former African-American". You can't change these things about yourself.

I'm not wholly sure what a compatibilist is, so feel free to explain.


Your view is Calvinistic if you truly believe in predestination and think that it is no one's choice but God's to save what you may call the "elect". Your analogy does not work. The former is a religion, the latter is a race. Religion could be compared to philosophy or a political position, but it's nothing like skin color.

A compatibilist is also known as a soft-determinist. It is someone who believes that free will and determinism can coexist. The Stoics, Calvin, Spinoza, and others like Daniel Dennett would be considered compatibilists. Of course, aside from philosophy, I currently do not believe in free will or predestination.

Even if I were to search my brain for a more accurate analogy I doubt you would believe me. The fact of the matter is, you're looking for a logical explanation. God doesn't conform to human logic, yet everything He says and does is completely logical. Believing in Him calls for faith, which is basically blind following. If you don't have faith, no amount of truth will convince you. It'll always sound contradicting.

And thanks for telling me that. If you don't believe in free will or predestination, what exactly do you believe in?
Gonecrazy12345
"What do you mean when you say you experience God?". . . If you do experience this, I would like it if you explained specifically what you mean when you say you experience God. Do you feel certain feelings that you associate with God? Does God communicate to you in some fashion when you pray to him? What exactly is this form of communication? Is it an actual literal voice, or is it something else?.


From the view point of an LDS member (mormon):

I believe in what my church calls the Godhead, which is made up of God, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost. God and Jesus both have bodies, so if they were to appear on earth then they would visually and physically appear on earth, and if they were to talk directly to someone on earth it would be an audible voice that person heard. The Holy Ghost does not have a body; he is a spirit, so he can act as a communication line between us and God, sorta like a telephone. When we "experience God" we are getting his message or feeling his presence through the Holy Ghost.

That covers how we feel God's presence. Now to talk about what it feels like. I suppose it depends on the situation. For example, let's say you're about to make an important life-changing decision, and you think that you're about to make the right choice, but you want to pray and ask God, just to make sure. If he agrees with what you are about to choose, then you will probably get a warm fuzzy feeling in you're heart, and all you're doubts will wash away and you'll gain a deep conviction that it's the right decision to make. If he wants to warn you away from the decision you're about to make, however, you'll probably get a foreboding feeling in your heart, and you'll have a deep conviction that for whatever reason that choice is not one you should make. I'd say that warm fuzzy and deep foreboding are the two main categories.
Pseudo-Onkelos's avatar

Adored Admirer

ich-Rawr
Even if I were to search my brain for a more accurate analogy I doubt you would believe me. The fact of the matter is, you're looking for a logical explanation. God doesn't conform to human logic, yet everything He says and does is completely logical. Believing in Him calls for faith, which is basically blind following. If you don't have faith, no amount of truth will convince you. It'll always sound contradicting.

And thanks for telling me that. If you don't believe in free will or predestination, what exactly do you believe in?


I am fine believing in the Canaanite pantheon, the god of Israel possibly being one of the sons of 'El. My understanding of 'El 'Elyon is more human than the god you believe in because I have decided to study the Tanakh to understand how the Hebrews and ancient Israelites believed in their god. By doing this, I have learned that the attributes associated with the god of Christianity has become the god of the philosophers, i.e., Plato and Aristotle. First Temple Judaism differs in understanding God when compared to Second Temple Judaism.

I suppose you may call it randomness.
Pseudo-Onkelos
Gonecrazy12345
That's good, I'm happy there's people like you roaming the LD and the Morality & Religion forum as well. I don't consider myself knowledgeable with philosophy and especially religion, but I do take it very seriously as well. I used to be into philosophy hardcore about 2-3 years ago and then I got bored of it for a while. But then I got into what's called an "existential crisis" in my life and I got interested in philosophy again. I also listened to some lectures on YouTube by biblical scholars and that's what sparked my interest in studying The Bible.

I don't know what else to say besides that. But if I may, you said you were a former Christian. If I'm understanding you correctly, you are saying you also felt like you were "experiencing" God. Could you explain more in detail what exactly those feelings were? And if you used to experience those things, but you no longer believe in Yahweh, why did you stop believing in him even though you felt like you had experienced him?


I am wondering if I have experienced this "existential crisis" you speak of as well. I cannot say I became bored of religion, but I suppose you could say I became desensitized as I began to cease attending church. I felt that I was attending for the wrong reasons.

After that, I gradually discontinued from praying and reading the Bible. I still believed in the god of Israel, and I still do to this day, but things changed. When I returned on Gaia, I thought perhaps I would become interested in religion again. It took a bit of time, but I eventually returned with a different perspective.

There were three things that caused me to leave Christianity. The first thing was my lack of exposure to it over time. I still hung onto what was left. What cut the cords, so to speak, was that someone on Gaia named Sandokiri pointed out that Jesus and his believers were expecting the Second Coming to occur in their lifetime.

The final thing was that I realized I became more liberal in my views. I once was a Creationist, I once opposed homosexuality, and I once opposed pro-choice. So when I tried to understand the Bible objectively, it was there that I began reading what conservatives had to say about things like the failed Documentary Hypothesis and how they said that liberal Christians "claimed" to believe what the Bible said and other things like that.

This finally led me to think that Christians treated each other as anything but brotherly. I made a thread in Morality & Religion about this and decided that perhaps I should try to understand the god of Israel as how He was understood by the Hebrews. So I still am a theist, but through what I have found from the Tanakh, the ancient Israelites acknowledged the existence of other gods.

Anyway, my darkest times came about when I became a Calvinist. I found the view to be agreeable with what the Bible taught. What I hated about Calvinism was that I could not choose to become a Christian. It was not my choice. The act was entirely monergistic, meaning that—unlike the mainstream view where God is waiting for you to believe in Him—God was actually the One Who made you believe in Him.

I was never certain of my salvation and I would worry. I would find myself falling into legalism, and when I did, I had to remind myself that it is God's grace that saved me, not my own acts. I had to be cautious of legalism and a living faith. Instead of experiencing God at these times, however, I would tend to feel as though God was not present. This affected my life. I could not enjoy this or that without worrying about devoting my life to God.

Ugh, there I go again. So, yeah.


Maybe you have experienced it, I'm not sure. Basically my existential crisis made me feel like I was literally going insane. I got to the point that I didn't even know if it was worth it expressing anything linguistically anymore, with people and with myself. My mind also got even more confused, because when I was having this thought that I couldn't express what I was thinking with language, I was reading Ludwig Wittgenstein's work. If you're not familiar with that philosopher, one of his important arguments is that language is a public bi-product and there's no such thing as a private language, and furthermore he proposed that all knowledge and thoughts could be expressed with language. Well this directly contradicted what I was thinking, which made me even more confused. There's much more to my existential crisis then that, but basically what happened in my experience was that I lost all confidence in any form of knowledge and any foundation of knowledge, which also had really negative impacts on me emotionally as well. I still think I'm getting over my existential crisis, but I'm definitely feeling and doing a lot better than I was just like 6 months ago.

The "failed" Documentary Hypothesis? To my knowledge the Documentary Hypothesis is the most legitimate theory on the authors of The Bible. To my knowledge, the majority of well accredited biblical scholars who actually post peer reviewed studies, accept the Documentary Hypothesis. For example people like Bart Ehrman and Richard Elliott Friedman.

So you still believe in Yahweh, but are you also a Pagan? For example, I know that in parts of Genesis (Forgot if it was J or E that called God "El" ) and of course El was actually one of the pagan god's of the early Isrealite religion along with Yahweh who was one of the god's as well. But then of course there's the passage in Exodus that says that El and Yahweh are the same God (but according to the Documentary Hypothesis, the person who wrote this passage in Exodus was an author much later than J and E).

I'm just confused with what you believe now. You don't call yourself a Christian, and I'm assuming you don't consider yourself a follower of Judaism either, but you believe Yahweh (or do you believe a different God and believe Yahweh is a false God of The Bible? Just like how according to the Documentary Hypothesis, much of the Torah acknowledges pagan God's when you recognize that many of the books in the Torah were written by multiple authors at different times in Israel's history). Do you believe Jesus died for your sins anymore?
ZoMmbiesss's avatar

Bloodsucker

5,900 Points
  • Somebody Likes You 100
  • Generous 100
  • First step to fame 200
Pseudo-Onkelos
ich-Rawr
Even if I were to search my brain for a more accurate analogy I doubt you would believe me. The fact of the matter is, you're looking for a logical explanation. God doesn't conform to human logic, yet everything He says and does is completely logical. Believing in Him calls for faith, which is basically blind following. If you don't have faith, no amount of truth will convince you. It'll always sound contradicting.

And thanks for telling me that. If you don't believe in free will or predestination, what exactly do you believe in?


I am fine believing in the Canaanite pantheon, the god of Israel possibly being one of the sons of 'El. My understanding of 'El 'Elyon is more human than the god you believe in because I have decided to study the Tanakh to understand how the Hebrews and ancient Israelites believed in their god. By doing this, I have learned that the attributes associated with the god of Christianity has become the god of the philosophers, i.e., Plato and Aristotle. First Temple Judaism differs in understanding God when compared to Second Temple Judaism.

I suppose you may call it randomness.

Randomness? Not at all. I don't know enough about these things you speak of to make a relevant comment, but I'm going to study them a bit. I've realized that most Christians are ignorant, myself included. Although I disagree with your position, I respect that you've done your research. :3
Twisted Rainbow Insanity's avatar

Chatty Fatcat

7,150 Points
  • Popular Thread 100
  • Happy Birthday! 100
  • Elocutionist 200
...Actually the vast majority of us are atheists.
Pseudo-Onkelos
ich-Rawr
Even if I were to search my brain for a more accurate analogy I doubt you would believe me. The fact of the matter is, you're looking for a logical explanation. God doesn't conform to human logic, yet everything He says and does is completely logical. Believing in Him calls for faith, which is basically blind following. If you don't have faith, no amount of truth will convince you. It'll always sound contradicting.

And thanks for telling me that. If you don't believe in free will or predestination, what exactly do you believe in?


My understanding of 'El 'Elyon is more human than the god you believe.


Kind of a side note to this thread, but I'm curious as to why you believe El is more of a human God than perhaps the God of Yahweh.

I actually would agree with that statement, for example I would refer to the fact that the god Jacob wrestled with who later named him "Israel" was El, not Yahweh (Of course interpreting this fact in the perspective of the Documentary Hypothesis).

Furthermore in other parts of Genesis, for example another part I remember is when God arguably came to earth to Abraham to visit his nephew Lot in the form of one of the three men (Which is debatable, in the Morality & Religion forum a while ago, I argued with one of the posters who said that none of the men were God and all of them were angels. My interpretation was that one of them was God and the other two were angels).

Regardless though, according to my interpretation of the scripture, I noticed a difference between the God in Genesis compared to the God after Exodus. The God after Exodus seemed to be different and less human than El in Genesis. For example in Exodus no one is allowed to see God except for Moses, and no one ever even got to see God in human form, including Moses.

Just curious what your thoughts are on this.
Pseudo-Onkelos's avatar

Adored Admirer

Gonecrazy12345
Maybe you have experienced it, I'm not sure. Basically my existential crisis made me feel like I was literally going insane. I got to the point that I didn't even know if it was worth it expressing anything linguistically anymore, with people and with myself. My mind also got even more confused, because when I was having this thought that I couldn't express what I was thinking with language, I was reading Ludwig Wittgenstein's work. If you're not familiar with that philosopher, one of his important arguments is that language is a public bi-product and there's no such thing as a private language, and furthermore he proposed that all knowledge and thoughts could be expressed with language. Well this directly contradicted what I was thinking, which made me even more confused. There's much more to my existential crisis then that, but basically what happened in my experience was that I lost all confidence in any form of knowledge and any foundation of knowledge, which also had really negative impacts on me emotionally as well. I still think I'm getting over my existential crisis, but I'm definitely feeling and doing a lot better than I was just like 6 months ago.


The name is familiar to me. I recall you making a thread (or it could have been someone else) about language games and how language only has relevance to what is being discussed. In that thread, someone used Yu-Gi-Oh as an example.

Gonecrazy12345
The "failed" Documentary Hypothesis? To my knowledge the Documentary Hypothesis is the most legitimate theory on the authors of The Bible. To my knowledge, the majority of well accredited biblical scholars who actually post peer reviewed studies, accept the Documentary Hypothesis. For example people like Bart Ehrman and Richard Elliott Friedman.


There are those who still accept the Mosaic view of the Torah. Some may still accept it, some may still promote it. I am of the opinion that Moses didn't write the Torah by himself, but I do not readily accept the Documentary Hypothesis like I used to. I am indifferent about it. Here is an article. Feel free to read it at your leisure.

Gonecrazy12345
So you still believe in Yahweh, but are you also a Pagan? For example, I know that in parts of Genesis (Forgot if it was J or E that called God "El" ) and of course El was actually one of the pagan god's of the early Isrealite religion along with Yahweh who was one of the god's as well. But then of course there's the passage in Exodus that says that El and Yahweh are the same God (but according to the Documentary Hypothesis, the person who wrote this passage in Exodus was an author much later than J and E).

I'm just confused with what you believe now. You don't call yourself a Christian, and I'm assuming you don't consider yourself a follower of Judaism either, but you believe Yahweh (or do you believe a different God and believe Yahweh is a false God of The Bible? Just like how according to the Documentary Hypothesis, much of the Torah acknowledges pagan God's when you recognize that many of the books in the Torah were written by multiple authors at different times in Israel's history). Do you believe Jesus died for your sins anymore?


Yes, I still believe in Yahweh, although not in the same way many Jews and Christians do today. I don't have a label for myself, unless you want to call me a polytheist.

'El was the name of the chief god in Canaanite religion. It is also a generic Hebrew word for "god", which can be applied to any god, including the god of Israel.

When I was a Christian, I thought that if I was not one, I'd want to join Judaism. The problem with that was I needed a rabbi to convert, and it isn't a religion you can just join. So I decided I would just study further on ancient Near Eastern religion.

I do not believe Jesus died for my sins anymore.
Twisted Rainbow Insanity
...Actually the vast majority of us are atheists.


I know most people in the LD and ED are atheists, but I was referring to most people who believe in God. Regardless, whether most people who believe in God on gaia are Christian or not is not very important to my thread. The most important part of my thread is to hear what people have to say who believe in some form of a theistic God/god's.

Also yes, as I and another poster have explained, there are such things as non-theistic god's.
Pseudo-Onkelos's avatar

Adored Admirer

ich-Rawr
Pseudo-Onkelos
ich-Rawr
Even if I were to search my brain for a more accurate analogy I doubt you would believe me. The fact of the matter is, you're looking for a logical explanation. God doesn't conform to human logic, yet everything He says and does is completely logical. Believing in Him calls for faith, which is basically blind following. If you don't have faith, no amount of truth will convince you. It'll always sound contradicting.

And thanks for telling me that. If you don't believe in free will or predestination, what exactly do you believe in?


I am fine believing in the Canaanite pantheon, the god of Israel possibly being one of the sons of 'El. My understanding of 'El 'Elyon is more human than the god you believe in because I have decided to study the Tanakh to understand how the Hebrews and ancient Israelites believed in their god. By doing this, I have learned that the attributes associated with the god of Christianity has become the god of the philosophers, i.e., Plato and Aristotle. First Temple Judaism differs in understanding God when compared to Second Temple Judaism.

I suppose you may call it randomness.

Randomness? Not at all. I don't know enough about these things you speak of to make a relevant comment, but I'm going to study them a bit. I've realized that most Christians are ignorant, myself included. Although I disagree with your position, I respect that you've done your research. :3


It would only be appropriate for you to believe in a deterministic view, whether soft or hard, since you believe in an omniscient god. (By the way, I don't spell "god" with a lowercase "G" to belittle or disregard your belief in God.)

Thank you.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff