Bornes
Jacque De Molay
She can win this case. Do traces of another person's touch exist over a years time? There has to be something she can do, right?
She has a police report and she probably did a rape kit. Unless they bring in some person who can analyze the tape and say 'this is definitely coercion and non-consensual"
I really think the tape's going to be her downfall.
There's a possibility of her winning the case, sure. But there's an even larger possibility that she won't. Most rape trials don't end in a conviction (is that the correct way to word that?).
If she goes to trial she'll:
- be forced to relive the entire experience
- defend herself against victim blamers
- and if she loses, she loses all credibility and will become the "b***h that cried fake rape"
- If she wins, she'll turn into the "b***h that ruined [rapist's] life."
If it were me, I wouldn't do it. That's me.
But none of us here in this thread are specialized in this sort of thing. So she needs to talk to the sex crimes detective first, and listen to what THEY have to say. Not us.
I completely disagree with the bold. Many rape cases do not end in conviction because of lack of evidence usually because the victim waited too long. With her recollection of what happened, it would not be a stretch to a jury that he had threatened her to be compliant. The video and rape kit, coupled with a voluntary lie detector test, this could be a very easy case to win. I am a very skeptical person and I would vote to convict if I was on a jury. And if anything it would not even see a jury. A lot of DAs like to rack up charges to intimidate the defense, even if they know they can only win a couple. 9/10 the defense would rather plea out for a verdict of a year or two than fight in trial against seeing a couple decades.
Going to trial would definitely be painful, but after seeing some of the details it becomes pretty obvious that it would be beneficial for her to go through and press charges. Besides, doing nothing she would essentially be giving him control over her, even long after the event happened. She would forever be a victim and suffer the emotional trauma of what happened indefinitely. He could attack others in a similar fashion and the OP may hear about it through the news, friends, social media, etc. and feel responsible/guilty. If it went to trial people can believe what they want, but that is on them, not her.