Quote:
With my question, what I'm really asking (or I guess meant to ask) is how is
homosexuality morally beneficial to society?
I could ask the same of heterosexuality. Both can have normal, happy, healthy families and both have the potential to be a detriment to society. The fact that heterosexual couples can naturally have children doesn't make them as perfect and infallible as you make them out to be, no matter how deeply anyone deludes themselves to believe it does.
Quote:
Gay marriage is beneficial for those participating in gay marriage.
Again, the same can be said of heterosexual marriage, so why not allow gays to be married?
Quote:
Also, the reason straight couples get benefits is because they're following the laws of nature.
If that's the case, gay couples deserve the same benefits, since homosexuality isn't an exclusively human phenomenon. Besides that, marriage law mentions a grand total of ZERO things about the laws of nature anyway. Try again.
Quote:
I don't ever remember there being any sort of gay couple being there when the first straight couple came about to the human race.
And just when did the first straight couple come about? How do you know there weren't any gay couples around then?
Quote:
So, to answer your question, I'll ask another one: If gay people weren't abused as children, then what good, moral reasons would someone have (aside from "choice) to become gay?
How the hell do you answer a question with a question? Seems like a cop out to me.
Quote:
Because I've researched enough to know that there are people who are real and who are fake.
Citation needed. Name your method of determining the difference between a "true" homosexual and a "false" homosexual. Also, show me studies and reasearch that proves your claims true.
Quote:
If I'm going to help LGTB people, I need to know if they are truly gay for themselves or if they're gay for money and fame. You can't tell me that there aren't cases in the LGTB community where someone was found out for not being gay and only pretending to be gay just to get money and attention.
That's unbelievably arrogant and presumptuous of you. It's also highly condescending. You think you're some sort of white knight who's gonna ride in and "liberate" these people, but you aren't gonna do anything but show more people just how bigoted you are. Homosexuals will be far better off without your sort of "help".
Quote:
Psychological counseling and therapy to discover why they're gay, but more so, why they should continue to be. What counseling and therapy did you think I meant?
Knowing your type? Pray the gay away camps and self shaming "therapy" sessions designed to shame them into living a lie. These people aren't stupid. They know they're homosexuals and they don't need to be given any new validation as to why. If they did, they'd seek it out.
Quote:
Because they're not gay. I can't believe you even asked this.
And why not?
Oh no you don't. Answer my last question first. I wanna see defenitive proof backing up all the claims in your original post that homosexuals are the way they are because they were abused as children, as well as your claim that you researched homosexuals and found them to be dishonest about their lifestyle.
Quote:
Wait. What factor don't they have no control over? Marriage? Well, if they didn't choose to be gay, then they could marry the gender opposite of them and enjoy the benefits of a straight couple.
Do you realize how little sense that makes? If they're homosexual, they aren't going to be capable of loving someone from the opposite sex.