Turkey lied to the United Nations when it claimed that Syria had apologized and taken responsibility for the mortar attack which led to a de facto declaration of war, increasing the likelihood that the shelling was actually carried out by Turkish-backed FSA rebels.
However, despite international propaganda media headlines proclaiming it to be the case, Syria never took responsibility for the attack and never apologized for it.
As Syria’s UN representative, Bashar al-Jaafari, made clear during a statement, although offering condolences to the victims of the attack in Turkey, Syria refused to accept the blame.
Announcing that the Syrian authorities were conducting a detailed investigation of the incident, al-Jaafari said, “This was not an apology, this was an expression of solidarity with the civilians.”
“The investigation is not over yet. The Syrian authorities are doing their duty. We ask the Turkish side to do the same,” he added.
Despite al-Jaafari’s insistence that Syria did not apologize and did not accept responsibility for the attack, the notion that Syria launched the initial attack and later admitted to it, thereby justifying Turkey’s aggressive response, has taken hold as part of the official narrative behind the entire series of events. This again emphasizes how NATO powers and compliant Gulf states are desperate to create a pretext for regime change in Syria, and will not stop at fabricating an incident and then inventing lies about it in order to manufacture a casus belli for a military assault.