Welcome to Gaia! ::

RedPatriot's avatar

8,250 Points
  • Wall Street 200
  • Citizen 200
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
Quote:

The playground structure is brand new and a child’s dream: soaring metal beams and a tantalizing spider web of climbing net. It sits outside Stratford Landing Elementary School, but all the students can do is stare at it from afar.

Behind the yellow caution tape fettering the apparatus are what parents describe as reams of bureaucratic red tape threatening the equipment, which was built with $35,000 from countless PTA silent auctions and bake sales.

Although parents worked with the Fairfax County Public Schools facilities department, purchased the equipment, hired a contractor and had the playground ready for recess, the school system suddenly deemed the play equipment too dangerous. Since Nov. 30 it has been off-limits, parents say.

Never mind that the same equipment is installed at more than 1,200 parks and schools across the country, including a public park in the county.

“We have $35,000 wrapped up in caution tape,” said Eleanor Whitaker, mother of second- and sixth-graders at Stratford Landing, in the Alexandria section of Fairfax, near Mount Vernon.


What began as an effort to make recess more enjoyable for kids quickly evolved into a feud between parents and school officials.

Parents say the kids just want to have fun. Officials say the school system wants to avoid potential lawsuits should a child be injured on the equipment. According to statistics from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, more than 200,000 children visit emergency rooms annually after playground accidents.

The facilities department says the new equipment must go. But to make amends, Fairfax is offering to revamp the Stratford Landing playground, using about $135,000 from the county’s coffers.

“Funding a new playground is costing taxpayer money,” Whitaker said. “It would be a tremendous waste of money to pull the equipment out.”

Stratford Landing’s principal did not return calls seeking comment. County school officials said the equipment doesn’t meet strict requirements.

“Unfortunately, the playground equipment purchased by the PTA does not meet FCPS safety standards,” school system spokesman John Torre said. “We are currently working with school officials to consider options to upgrade and renovate the entire school playground.”



The project started last year before summer break. The PTA — having raised funds to expand the playground for a school that had grown to 870 students — asked for guidance from Fairfax’s facilities department. The PTA says the county provided the parents with literature about school playground construction procedures and catalogues from approved vendors.

With input from students, the PTA bought a climbing obstacle developed by Landscape Structures, a Minnesota-based playground equipment manufacturer. The group chose the popular Evos system, with arching spans of tubes that more closely resemble a modernist sculpture than the wooden platform playground equipment of yore.

The PTA then hired Isaac Sparks, a construction manager for Sparks @ Play, a playgrounds specialist based in Owings Mills, Md., to install the structure. By early November, the students were romping all over it.

Soon, however, a county playground inspector was on the scene, declaring the structure a hazard.

In a written report, the inspector found that among other safety issues, parts of the structure were too tall. One part of the equipment is 94 inches above the ground, 10 inches higher than the school system allows. The report said that deviating from the school system’s playground protocols “places users at an increased life-safety risk” and that the Evos system could lead to head injuries and neck entrapment. “The equipment should be removed from the property,” according to the report.

Fred Caslavka, Landscape Structures’ chief financial officer, said the Evos system is safe, fun and popular with children.

“It is one of our more popular designs,” Caslavka said. “I’m actually quite surprised that Fairfax County says it’s not safe. I’m totally confident it complies with all the standards out there.”

According to company data, there are 1,255 Evos play structures across the country. One is in Fairfax, at Arrowbrook Centre Park.

Sparks, who helped oversee the Evos installation at Arrowbrook, said two are installed in Arlington County, at the Charles Drew Community Center and Mace Park. Officials with the Arlington school system said there is another at Oakridge Elementary. Sparks called the Evos system the standard playground equipment for D.C. public schools.

In an e-mail to PTA members, David Bennett, a Fairfax schools facilities management employee, explained the rationale for removing the equipment.

“As for allowing the equipment at Stratford Landing, it would be setting a new standard,” Bennett wrote. “How could we deny another school or PTA the same playground equipment if we allowed it at [Stratford Landing]?”


Source;
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-31/local/36650883_1_new-playground-new-equipment-landscape-structures
Blood Valkyrie's avatar

Sparkly Shapeshifter

11,550 Points
  • Megathread 100
  • Lavish Tipper 200
  • Person of Interest 200
Well that's unfortunate.
I can kinda understand the reasons but... it still sucks for the kids whom spent all that time and energy to get the playground equipment only for it to be taken away from them in a sense.
8 tailed snake miu's avatar

Friendly Citizen

8,550 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Citizen 200
  • Friendly 100
I know back when I was in school, every year on the first week of school we would go around the playground. We would be given some papers with pictures on them and rules for the play structures ( The one's that couldn't read had to listen obviously). But by doing that my school had no accidents ( well maybe a boo boo every once in awhile, but nothing like a head injury.)

So why couldn't the school do something like that? instead of spending more money stressed
Existential Existence's avatar

Scholarly Storyteller

25,150 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Battle: Level 10 250
  • Alchemy Level 10 100
i'm just surprised that they paid $35k for this p.o.s.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

it's so ugly.
Honey of the South's avatar

Lupine Rogue

9,100 Points
  • Battle: Rogue 100
  • Popular Thread 100
  • The Wolf Within 100
Existential Existence
i'm just surprised that they paid $35k for this p.o.s.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

it's so ugly.
Are you kidding? It may not look pretty, but it does look fun to play on.

In any case, getting injuries while playing is all part of growing up. After all, one's childhood can't be complete without at least one trip to the ER. I've only been once for my own injury, but my sister's been more than once. None of them were a result of playing on a playground.
Existential Existence's avatar

Scholarly Storyteller

25,150 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Battle: Level 10 250
  • Alchemy Level 10 100
Honey of the South
Existential Existence
i'm just surprised that they paid $35k for this p.o.s.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

it's so ugly.
Are you kidding? It may not look pretty, but it does look fun to play on.

In any case, getting injuries while playing is all part of growing up. After all, one's childhood can't be complete without at least one trip to the ER. I've only been once for my own injury, but my sister's been more than once. None of them were a result of playing on a playground.

It looks super ugly to me. And so minimal for 35k.

something like this
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.....now THAT looks like it's worth all the money it costs to make

or this one
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

so cool.

the one they bought looks too simplistic for 35k...not only simplistic (nothing but wavy monkey bars and weird a rope ladder), but ugly.
rawnie14's avatar

Quotable Noob

8,950 Points
  • Gaian 50
  • Member 100
  • Window Shopper 100
ANOTHER SHINING EXAMPLE OF ADULTS WITH THEIR HEADS UP THEIR REAR-ENDS WHILE THE CHILDREN SUFFER!
Way to waste the money.
nayasumei's avatar

Tipsy Tipper

5,600 Points
  • Peoplewatcher 100
  • Lavish Tipper 200
  • Partygoer 500
Existential Existence
i'm just surprised that they paid $35k for this p.o.s.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.

it's so ugly.


I don't know, if I had that in my backyard (if I still had one anyways)... I would spend most of my days on that thing!
xdivision_whitey's avatar

Quotable Informer

16,700 Points
  • Cheerbringer 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Pet Lover 100
Fine take it done and refund the pta. Never add big things all kids can get hurt on them. Kids will fall from them, hang from them, get there heads stuck, be burnt on them. Buy the kids balls and chalk and jump ropes. Getting sick of read tape.
David2074's avatar

Playful Kitten

16,800 Points
  • Conversationalist 100
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Conventioneer 300
So no piece of equipment can be over 7 feet tall. That sounds sucky. I used to like the tall slide.

What doesn't seem to be addressed in this article is did or did not the school sign off on the final design?
If they did shame on the school.
If they didn't then shame on the PTA for not getting final approval before buying / installing a particular model. I did read that they consulted the county but obviously the county is not the controlling factor for what is placed on school property since it is the school that is saying no.
Noire du Fountaine 's avatar

Brainy Bookworm

11,200 Points
  • Cat Fancier 100
  • The Wolf Within 100
  • Unleash the Beast 100
Shouldn't someone have checked it out before it was bought?
Yonakii's avatar

Rainbow Admirer

Playgrounds are becoming more for toddlers than for any other age group due to all these adults thinking the tiniest things could result in a lawsuit. Hell, my old elementary school did away with all the swings and climbable monkey bars. The most fun things were deemed "too fun" I suppose.
Malee's avatar

Aged Noob

9,850 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Marathon 300
  • Forum Regular 100
What saddens me is that many of these adults are only a few years older than me and we all played on equipment that was a lot less safe than that and survived. When did it change that children's feet can't be more than 2 inches off the ground and everyone must be a winner!

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games