Lunarflowermaiden
I was wondering when they'd get around to Pokemon. Since they have already gone after Mario (for the Tanooki suit), Battlefield 3 (for stabbing a rat), Resident Evil (killing animals), Tiny Zoo (for imprisoning poor animals). And oddly praised the Fable series for giving good points for eating vegetarian food, and evil points for eating meat. This game also has a mini game where you kick chickens, apparently they didn't get to that part in the game.
http://www.gametrailers.com/side-mission/32227/pokemon-black-and-white-gets-skewered-in-petas-latest-game
"If PETA existed in Unova, our motto would be: Pokémon are not ours to use or abuse. They exist for their own reasons. We believe that this is the message that should be sent to children."
PeTA, you already do exist in Unova. You're Team Plasma, aka the bad guys that get pummeled.
http://features.peta.org/pokemon-black-and-white-parody/
Apparently they do know they are the bad guys, look at the sign Pikachu is holding in their parody game.
There are alot of games that involve attacking creatures; Peta just seems to be going after popular games or game series that have been around awhile and within the last year they only just started this idea that "fighting (monsters, creatures, animals) in games means gamers abuse animals in real life".
We give PETA too much power; there are other organizations actually focus on real animals being abused and work to help those animals, not attack meat eaters,gamers and other groups because they appear to encourage abuse or support an industry they think counts as abuse. To PETA, its their way or you're wrong and your argument is irreverent and wrong. I stopped watching Jane Velz-Mitchell because she got PETA reps on her show every chance she could and even if there was an expert from the other side of the argument PETA did all the talking.