Eveille
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:44:58 +0000
xdivision_whitey
Eveille
xdivision_whitey
Notice how the Native American can touch, have and kill for Eagle Feathers why let a Asian, black man or someone of European blood with no documented N.A. heritage touch It they get thrown under the bus with a $250,000 dollar penalty up to 2 in federal prison.
That happens in a lot of countries. It's called recognizing the problem and respecting those who were there first.
In Central and South America there are quite a few biosphere reserves and preserves where there were and are native human populations that live there. The preserves were created and they were not evicted. Wy not? Because they weren't the ******** problem. Native people had lived there for hundreds, if not thousands, of years and those trees and those species were still there. Europeans came and, shock of shock, s**t started getting endangered. So who should be banned? Those who have proven they can use it responsibly and for whom it is a critical part of their culture and belief systems? Or those who came in later and exploited it for commercial and materialistically petty gain and who have no damned self control when it comes to making a quick buck?
Think about it for more tha. 2 seconds and you'll realize it isn't cause the law hates the white man as you so love to keep posting in all manner of threads. It's getting annoying.
I am aware of all the mega fauna extinctions that happened at the end of the last ice age, yes. It was a combo of climate change and humans, not just humans, i dont think there was enough population density for humans alone to have been the issue back then.
Nothing can be done about that one. Something can be done about the species we have now and which we are actively decimating. The natives hadn't made those extinct, and considering their populations, I don't think they could have if they tried. Compared to 300 million of us which would make it a walk in the park to eliminate nearly everything in site, and which we were doing quite well until the 1960s-70s.