Welcome to Gaia! ::


Quotable Informer

20,825 Points
  • Elysium's Gatekeeper 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Frozen Sleuth 100
A Muslim woman who was forced to remove her hijab by police in Michigan claims her religious rights were violated, and she’s hoping a civil rights lawsuit will ensure other women don't have the same experience.

Malak Kazan, 27, is suing the police department and city of Dearborn Heights, a suburb of Detroit, after officers refused her request to keep her headscarf on while taking a booking photo. Her attorney Amir Makled filed the lawsuit in federal court Thursday.

“Malak has been very brave by going forward with this case,” Makled told The Huffington Post. “It’s something that’s going to be heightened exposure for her, and she’s kind of already suffered a little bit of backlash … The level of racism that’s out there, that she has witnessed on some of these websites [that covered her case], it’s been very upsetting to her. But she still carries on and is still proud to be a trailblazer for a just cause.”

Kazan was stopped for a traffic violation in Dearborn Heights on July 9, and was then arrested; Makled says her license had been suspended for outstanding traffic tickets. The lawsuit states that at the police station she was asked to remove her headscarf, which she wears in public and when she is in the presence of men who aren’t family members, for her booking photo. When she told the unnamed officer that to do so would violate her religious beliefs, he said there were no exceptions. She spoke with his supervisor, who also allegedly refused her request.

Kazan says she then requested that a female officer take the photograph, which was also denied. The lawsuit alleges the first officer then threatened her with further detention if she didn’t comply.

The suit claims Kazan experienced “extreme shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and emotional distress” when she was forced to remove her hijab.

"To Ms. Kazan, wearing a headscarf is a reminder of her faith, the importance of modesty in her religion, and her religious obligations, as well as a symbol of her own control over who may see the more intimate parts of her body," the lawsuit states.

Kazan’s lawsuit calls on the police department to change its policy to allow headscarves worn for religious purposes and to provide training about the change.

“She doesn’t want to have other women [undergo similar experiences],” Makled said. “It’s a women’s rights issue as well as a Muslim rights issue.”

Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Gavin, who is named in Kazan’s lawsuit, did not return a request for comment but told FOX 2 that the department requires individuals to remove hats and other head coverings for safety reasons, as they can “contain concealable items that could pose a threat or chance of injury to the cops or to themselves.” He said procedure is to have women remove hijabs in the presence of a female officer, but there aren’t always enough female officers at the station.

“Our number one concern is security of our officers and the prisoners,” Gavin said.

Makled said from a legal standpoint, the police department would have to have a compelling reason in order to not make accommodations for a person’s religious practice, and he doesn't believe that was the case in this incident.

The city had not been served with the lawsuit as of Friday afternoon, Dearborn Heights Corporation Counsel Gary Miotke told HuffPost. He said he couldn’t knowledgeably comment until he had seen the allegations.

The Detroit area has one of the highest concentrations of Arab-Americans in the country, with a particularly strong community in Dearborn, adjacent to Dearborn Heights. In the last several years, Dearborn Heights’ Arab-American population has grown significantly, according to the Arab American News.

In December, the Arab-American Civil Rights League filed a different lawsuit against the city on behalf of a family who allege the police department discriminated against them, making anti-Arab remarks and retaliating when they complained.

In nearby cities and around the country, other Muslim women have faced circumstances similar to Kazan’s, being forced to remove headscarves worn for religious reasons while detained. Safety appears to be the primary reason cited for those rules, but, in recent years some departments -- including Washington, D.C. police -- have changed policies to allow women to keep their headscarves on in custody.

Another agency that now allows headscarves is the Orange County Sheriff's Department in California. In 2007, Anaheim resident Souhair Khatib sued after officers at a courthouse holding cell compelled her to remove her hijab for security reasons. The civil rights lawsuit was settled in 2013, and the OCSD changed their policy to allow religious headscarves, conducting trainings about the change.


Pay your tickets!

Cunning Comrade

16,225 Points
  • Budding Witch 250
  • Super Tipsy 200
  • Ghost Hunter 250
How awful. Why couldn't they just let her wear it?

Destructive Detective

19,200 Points
  • Bunny Spotter 50
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Cat Fancier 100
Take her damned license away, how many more times does she have to be arrested to show that she is incapable of following the rules of the road? It's funny that Islam requires its believers to follow the laws of the land in which they live yet she has no problem repeatedly violating that tenet of her faith. Can't wait for her scarf-less mugshot to be posted online.

Quotable Informer

20,825 Points
  • Elysium's Gatekeeper 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Frozen Sleuth 100
Ratttking
Take her damned license away, how many more times does she have to be arrested to show that she is incapable of following the rules of the road? It's funny that Islam requires its believers to follow the laws of the land in which they live yet she has no problem repeatedly violating that tenet of her faith. Can't wait for her scarf-less mugshot to be posted online.
I thought it was.

Destructive Detective

19,200 Points
  • Bunny Spotter 50
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Cat Fancier 100
xdivision_whitey
Ratttking
Take her damned license away, how many more times does she have to be arrested to show that she is incapable of following the rules of the road? It's funny that Islam requires its believers to follow the laws of the land in which they live yet she has no problem repeatedly violating that tenet of her faith. Can't wait for her scarf-less mugshot to be posted online.
I thought it was.
I looked, but found only her previous mugshot. Post it if you find the newest one?

Quotable Informer

20,825 Points
  • Elysium's Gatekeeper 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Frozen Sleuth 100
Ratttking
xdivision_whitey
Ratttking
Take her damned license away, how many more times does she have to be arrested to show that she is incapable of following the rules of the road? It's funny that Islam requires its believers to follow the laws of the land in which they live yet she has no problem repeatedly violating that tenet of her faith. Can't wait for her scarf-less mugshot to be posted online.
I thought it was.
I looked, but found only her previous mugshot. Post it if you find the newest one?


Is the one you saw Shoulder length dirt blonde hair in a orange suit?

I looked at the wrong picture on it! LOL I'll let you know if I find it.
Any legislature that hasn't equipped its police with the ability to ID citizens is mad enough to deserve the lawsuit.

Sure, wear whatever religious attire you wish to, but if you need to be ID'd by law enforcement, you're gonna have to show your face.

Eloquent Lunatic

10,425 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
  • Wall Street 200
I'd question what kind of Hijab she was wearing at the time, seeing as (As far as I know) they don't cover the face.

Mewling Fairy

8,700 Points
  • Big Tipper 100
  • Super Tipsy 200
  • Mega Tipsy 100
I was gonna say something but decided against it. I really don't know what say in this incident because both the woman and the police were at fault...? IDK.

Lord Elwrind's Queen

Dangerous Fairy

55,065 Points
  • Waffles! 25
  • Team Poison Master 250
  • Winged 100
The Curse
Any legislature that hasn't equipped its police with the ability to ID citizens is mad enough to deserve the lawsuit.

Sure, wear whatever religious attire you wish to, but if you need to be ID'd by law enforcement, you're gonna have to show your face.


Yes. But she requested that a female officer do it and that men not be present. They refused even this simple request.

Swashbuckling Inquisitor

12,750 Points
  • Profitable 100
  • Jolly Roger 50
  • Treasure Hunter 100
Nyadriel
The Curse
Any legislature that hasn't equipped its police with the ability to ID citizens is mad enough to deserve the lawsuit.

Sure, wear whatever religious attire you wish to, but if you need to be ID'd by law enforcement, you're gonna have to show your face.


Yes. But she requested that a female officer do it and that men not be present. They refused even this simple request.

What if the precinct didn't have a female officer? Would they have had to drive one in from the next county? confused If you are legally arrested (outstanding traffic tickets) you shouldn't have the right to make petty requests. If this causes "request your officer's gender" precedence, then this will bog down police procedure.

Conservative Regular

Kaiser Khorosho
Nyadriel
The Curse
Any legislature that hasn't equipped its police with the ability to ID citizens is mad enough to deserve the lawsuit.

Sure, wear whatever religious attire you wish to, but if you need to be ID'd by law enforcement, you're gonna have to show your face.


Yes. But she requested that a female officer do it and that men not be present. They refused even this simple request.

What if the precinct didn't have a female officer? Would they have had to drive one in from the next county? confused If you are legally arrested (outstanding traffic tickets) you shouldn't have the right to make petty requests. If this causes "request your officer's gender" precedence, then this will bog down police procedure.


I find it hard to believe that the police department does not have a female working within it

you don't need to be trained officer of the law to take a photo.

Distinct Member

Religion and tickets are two different matters. They could of just waited for a female officer and avoided the mess.

Upside she will be jailed for some time with other females so she cannot complain.

Ferocious Browser

The denial of a female officer to take the photo probably did them in. That was a stupid request to deny unless absolutely no women were on duty at that time.

They could have also taken the photo with the hijab. It isn't a license photo or a passport photo. It was a booking photo for stupid traffic violations.

If that is how she ALWAYS appears in public, then that is the more accurate representation of who to be on the lookout for. A photo without hijab could actually be confusing, people look way different with hair covered vs not covered.

Snuggly Buddy

29,150 Points
  • Conversationalist 100
  • Mark Twain 100
  • Conventioneer 300
Ratttking
Take her damned license away, how many more times does she have to be arrested to show that she is incapable of following the rules of the road? It's funny that Islam requires its believers to follow the laws of the land in which they live yet she has no problem repeatedly violating that tenet of her faith. Can't wait for her scarf-less mugshot to be posted online.


They already did. She was driving without a license.
"Makled says her license had been suspended for outstanding traffic tickets"

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum