False Dichotomy
Your experience is as meaningless (or possibly more meaningless) than my own for the means of proving anything here, and for a variety of reasons; two of which I've already discussed.
Because you are a hopeless kind of person who cares more about sounding right than being right. I made no defense of anyone, I merely made factual statements in direct assault towards your prejudice. Believe it or not, some people actually care about being right.
The weight of some is not the precedent of all.
No different? It's extremely different. One of them is dancing in a room owned by an establishment who pays taxes and respects age of consent laws... the other is (unlawfully) sucking someone off for cash.
So your entire argument here is that some men are asshats, therefore strippers are whores? Am I missing any important nuances left unnoticed in your poorly supported, self righteous rant?
One of us actually has experience and has met multiple people in the industry. The other has not. The second is not correct, and it's very funny you seem to think you can tell me about the things that I know and that you do not.
Awww, assumptions and oh look! It's the little cousin of the waaacism argument. "You don't agree with me and have standards and morals so that...that makes you a bad person and judgemental and meeean!" Newsflash - not only am I allowed to hold any viewpoint I want, applying 'right' and 'wrong' to an opinion is rather silly. If you're fond of whores, good for you, that's YOUR prerogative, and I am not any less worthy for holding a different view.
Considering most strippers give lap dances and that's offering sexual contact for money, that makes of them whores by the "standard" definition. As I've stated before, I consider anyone who exchanges sexual anything for money to be a whore. That encompasses all strippers who dance for money. Nice sidestep on showing that the definition you posted fits my views as well as yours though.
So it's okay to be a whore as long as you're over 18 and your establishment pays taxes. That's an interesting view. Also, just because the law says something is acceptable does not make it right. For example, being a whore is legal in Vegas. Hydrofracking is also legal in many places.
One line in a few paragraphs =/= an entire argument, and if you had reading comprehension, you would have seen that I clearly stated both parties are at fault. A sad indictment of the education system of whatever country you hail from.
I know I haven't missed anything in your completely unsupported, hypertolerant load of garbage, sadly. Since I've cleanly taken out your idea that 'whore' is not an appropriate word choice at the knees (and you lot still haven't provided what you feel is an acceptable alternative even), that leaves only you being intolerant over someone's else's viewpoint. Good day.