Welcome to Gaia! ::


Quotable Informer

20,825 Points
  • Elysium's Gatekeeper 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Frozen Sleuth 100
An infant in Texas died from Legionnaires’ disease a few weeks after being born in a heated birthing pool at home, according to a new report from investigators at the Texas Department of State Health Services.

Legionnaires’ disease is a severe form of pneumonia and is caused by Legionella bacteria, which live in warm water and can be commonly found in hot tubs and plumbing systems, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The baby’s death, in January 2014, is the first and only documented case of this infection linked with water birth in the United States, and comes after a few similar cases of Legionella infection reported in the UK and France. But there could be more cases that haven’t been reported, the researchers said.

Severe Legionella infection is not highly common (it sends about 8,000 to 18,000 Americans to hospital every year), but infants are at particularly higher risk for developing severe complications if they get infected with this bacterium.

"They are in a higher risk category because of their underdeveloped immune system, and their developing physiology," said co-author Elyse Fritschel, an epidemiologist at Texas Department of State Health Services.

The 6-day-old infant was taken to the hospital with breathing problems and other signs of an infection. The doctors tested for some more common bacteria, but they also suspected the infant might have Legionnaires’ disease because the infant was exposed to heated water. Tests showed the infant was indeed infected with Legionella. After a 19-day hospitalization, the baby died.

Texas public health investigators reviewed the disinfecting process used by the midwifery center that provided the family with the birthing tub. They also tested the tub for the bacteria, as well as the well water used to fill the tub.

However, by the time the investigators were called in, the birthing tub was already cleaned, disinfected and put in a storage. That is perhaps why the researchers didn’t find Legionella bacteria in the tub, they said. Testing the well water didn’t turn up anything, either, but current testing techniques don’t detect this bacterium 100 percent of the time.

The researchers said they believe the infant was infected by bacteria in the water during birth.

"Because Legionella is pretty ubiquitous in the environment, it’s not a big stretch to imagine that it would be in the water system, and there were no other exposures that were identified," Fritschel said.

Giving birth in water is generally not recommended because there are no proven benefits, and there are potential risks to the baby, according to a recent report from two leading medical groups, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The death of the infant highlights the risk of waterborne pathogens to babies born in water, as well as the need for more awareness of infections and standardized cleaning procedures, the researchers said.

The Texas health department drafted recommendations for the midwifery center regarding preventing Legionella infection, disinfection guidelines and using equipment suited for medical procedures, according to the report.

Awareness among expecting mothers is important, too, Fritschel said. “Those who opt for water birth procedures should know that this is a risk and talk to their doctor about it.”

Mom hasn't heard of this for years.

Romantic Werewolf

15,950 Points
  • Mega Tipsy 100
  • Cats vs Dogs 100
  • Threadmaster 200
Quote:
However, by the time the investigators were called in, the birthing tub was already cleaned, disinfected and put in a storage.


Whew, that was close! In a more patient-friendly state, those poor midwives might have been charged for causing the death of that baby! Why should they be responsible for providing clean and sanitary equipment?

Dedicated Firestarter

23,975 Points
  • Blazing Power of Friendship Wave 200
  • Comrades in Arms 150
  • Firestarter 200
Kai-Shan Valandria
Quote:
However, by the time the investigators were called in, the birthing tub was already cleaned, disinfected and put in a storage.


Whew, that was close! In a more patient-friendly state, those poor midwives might have been charged for causing the death of that baby! Why should they be responsible for providing clean and sanitary equipment?


I know a midwife who almost caused a baby to die because it was being strangled by its cord as she tried to use what amounts to a vacuum to get him out. The baby was BLUE and partway out when he came in, and barely survived the thing. Brain damage has yet to be accessed, as he is only a year old now. Midwife, still working and the parents didn't charge her. Refused to charge the woman at all in fact.

Aged Noob

12,450 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Bunny Hunter 100
  • Signature Look 250
Kai-Shan Valandria
Quote:
However, by the time the investigators were called in, the birthing tub was already cleaned, disinfected and put in a storage.


Whew, that was close! In a more patient-friendly state, those poor midwives might have been charged for causing the death of that baby! Why should they be responsible for providing clean and sanitary equipment?


No one was going to charge her with the babies death, they were simply trying to find the source, to rule out it causing any bigger problems.
I do agree there should be more vigilance and upping the standards used for water birthing.
Long term implication: stricter regulations and certifications for these procedures could lead to increasing the costs. Good things and bad things. But then, we all don't want infants dying after all.

Newbie Fatcat

8,025 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Member 100
  • Profitable 100
poor baby my fiancee refueses to have a home birth

Bloodthirsty Carnivore

27,550 Points
  • Hunter 50
  • Demonic Associate 100
  • Vicious Spirit 250
They tested the water source and didn't find the bacteria. It could have come from the parents using warm water to give the babe a sponge bath, or improperly heating water when mixing formula for the kid(if they fed the baby formula). If they didn't have a mixing valve installed on their water heater, it may only heat the water to 120, and the bacteria is killed at 140 degrees. A mixing valve would take water heated to 140 and bring it down to 120, so it'd be free of the bacteria and safe to use. Doesn't mean that the procedures for water births doesn't need to be looked at. Just means there are many ways the baby could have gotten it. It's not really something people know about or warn parents about.

Quotable Informer

20,825 Points
  • Elysium's Gatekeeper 100
  • Partygoer 500
  • Frozen Sleuth 100
jpgonzales
poor baby my fiancee refueses to have a home birth
She going for the more expensive route.

Newbie Fatcat

8,025 Points
  • Millionaire 200
  • Member 100
  • Profitable 100
told her that but she chooses not me

Sparkly Shapeshifter

12,950 Points
  • Megathread 100
  • Lavish Tipper 200
  • Person of Interest 200
Before hospitals existed, humans had been reproducing pretty well.

That being said, I'd prefer to give birth in a hospital, because ... drugs.

Mewling Consumer

16,100 Points
  • Alchemy Level 3 100
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Hive Mind 200
Blood Valkyrie
Before hospitals existed, humans had been reproducing pretty well.

That being said, I'd prefer to give birth in a hospital, because ... drugs.
infant mortality rates were way higher and so were deaths for mothers-drugs should not be the only reason to go to the hospital to give birth. It is just so much safer. This is just one example of why not to go to a midwife: http://www.skepticalob.com/2014/01/homebirth-midwives-reveal-death-rate-450-higher-than-hospital-birth-announce-that-it-shows-homebirth-is-safe.html

Sparkly Shapeshifter

12,950 Points
  • Megathread 100
  • Lavish Tipper 200
  • Person of Interest 200
AliKat1988
Blood Valkyrie
Before hospitals existed, humans had been reproducing pretty well.

That being said, I'd prefer to give birth in a hospital, because ... drugs.
infant mortality rates were way higher and so were deaths for mothers-drugs should not be the only reason to go to the hospital to give birth. It is just so much safer. This is just one example of why not to go to a midwife: http://www.skepticalob.com/2014/01/homebirth-midwives-reveal-death-rate-450-higher-than-hospital-birth-announce-that-it-shows-homebirth-is-safe.html


I'll gladly agree with you here.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum