Welcome to Gaia! ::


Quote:
Vice President Joe Biden swears in CIA Director John Brennan at the White House, March 8, 2013. (David Lienemann/Official …

Oh, dear. This is probably not the symbolism the White House wanted.

Hours after CIA Director John Brennan took the oath of office—behind closed doors, far away from the press, perhaps befitting his status as America's top spy—the White House took pains to emphasize the symbolism of the ceremony.

“There's one piece of this that I wanted to note for you,” spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at their daily briefing. “Director Brennan was sworn in with his hand on an original draft of the Constitution that had George Washington's personal handwriting and annotations on it, dating from 1787.”

Earnest said Brennan had asked for a document from the National Archives that would demonstrate the U.S. is a nation of laws.

"Director Brennan told the president that he made the request to the archives because he wanted to reaffirm his commitment to the rule of law as he took the oath of office as director of the CIA,” Earnest said.

The Constitution itself went into effect in 1789. But troublemaking blogger Marcy Wheeler points out that what was missing from the Constitution in 1787 is also quite symbolic: The Bill of Rights, which did not officially go into effect until December 1791 after ratification by states. (Caution: Marcy's post has some strong language.)

That means: No freedom of speech and of the press, no right to bear arms, no Fourth Amendment ban on “unreasonable searches and seizures,” and no right to a jury trial.

How ... symbolic?

link:http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/brennan-takes-oath-constitution-without-bill-rights-205110620.html

There's just no pleasing some people.

Alien Dog

17,850 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Voter 100
  • Mark Twain 100
well, it IS a pretty glaring error, if'n you think about it.

of course, from the current administration ( and the one before it ), then it it's at least a step in the right direction, that they would care about any part of the Constitution.

Lily-livered Cutie-Pie

8,950 Points
  • Partygoer 500
  • Thread Flip 150
  • Protector of Cuteness 150
They don't care about following the Constitution much anymore, so no surprise.

We criticize countries like China and North Korea, yet our government is doing similar things to it's citizens.

Benevolent Prophet

9,150 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Hygienic 200
It's kind of ironic that he used that version. It's also ironic how worthless the constiution is without the ammendments. It makes me wonder what our founding fathers were arguing about.
Cyber Dream
It's kind of ironic that he used that version. It's also ironic how worthless the constiution is without the ammendments. It makes me wonder what our founding fathers were arguing about.

Establishing the entire structure of our government is worthless?

Fluffy Loiterer

Well, it is a person's blog. I don't really see the symbolism here so I can't really comment. Sounds like he's making some snide comment about how it's symbolic of the US without it's bill of rights or something.

In the future, refrain from posting blogs with personal opinions.
Copper Shenanigans
Well, it is a person's blog. I don't really see the symbolism here so I can't really comment. Sounds like he's making some snide comment about how it's symbolic of the US without it's bill of rights or something.

In the future, refrain from posting blogs with personal opinions.

It started with someone's blog. It was picked up by Yahoo news, which is where I quoted from. And I have little doubt it will be on Fox 'News' before long.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum