Twilight Scribe
LadyEladrin
Healthcare is a right, not a privilege. That right there is the biggest divider between Canada and the US. Here, we view healthcare as being a right, not a privilege, whereas there, it's the opposite. It's a matter of differing views - the US has always been a more 'me-centric' nation. Canada is a country that embraces the idea that "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one." Why yes, I did just quote Star Trek. I'm quite proud to admit that I am a Canadian. I've been through emergency rooms three times in my life, and through a walk-in clinic. I know that my family is very glad to have the healthcare that we do.
Out of curiosity, how did the US deal with the H1N1 crisis and vaccinations? I know that I went to a walk-in clinic in my hometown and was in and out in about fifteen minutes - no exchange of money or verifying that I was insured - I just had to fill out a little card with some information like my name, date of birth, gender, etc. It was a quick and easy process and I know that my mom felt safer afterwards.
I would agree that the right and privilege is where people disagree. I'm American and I do not want this health care law. There are so many things wrong with it than good. In the US, you can get health care. Even illegals can get health care. And we have a pretty good health care. Why is it that many people from other countries come here for certain procedures? Why did Danny Williams, Primer of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador go to Miami for his heart surgery instead of using the Canadian health care system? He even was quoted in saying “This was my heart, my choice and my health,” and he's right. HIS CHOICE. Why is my government choosing for me?
Now even though we can get health care, it's the matter of paying for it is what's the issue. This health bill that passed is not about giving care. It's about power. Why not allow us to purchase across state lines so there's more competition? Why not allow me to customize my insurance to get rid of, say drug rehab and other options in my insurance that I know I will never need, thus making it cost cheaper? Why seize control of the whole thing (slowly mind you so that eventually the public option will be in place), so that they can tell us what we can and cannot do with our own bodies? A New York Senator is trying to ban salt from restaurants because salt's bad for you. Some advocacy group wants to retire the Ronald McDonald's Clown because he somehow makes little kids eat unhealthy. They're trying to micromanage us left and right. Would you like to be a full grown adult, in your 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and still being micromanaged by your parents? Of course not (at least I hope you don't). You want to be on your own, make your own decisions, your own mistakes, and learn from them. You don't want to be held by the hand all throughout your life. That's what the government is trying to do.
As for the law, why is student loans in there? Why is the government making it so that they are the only ones that give student loans to college students? What's that got to do with health care? Why did they exempt senior staff members who helped write the bill from this law if it's suppose to be so good? Why are they making it come into effect in 2014 (after the elections) so people don't really know how it's going to affect them till later? Why is it 2,409 pages long?
There are many other aspects of this bill, and lots of debate back and forth on who has the correct facts. One side says "read the bill, my facts are correct." The other side also says the same, so it becomes frustrating and thus, name calling, personal bashing, and outright rudeness ensues on both sides.