Own x Yourself
Ah, makes sense.
Yes, I know that wikipedia is always touted as a bad source of information, and honestly I don't really use it frequently/seek it out above other sources. I generally use
this place. If it's a drug I'm actually taking (or a friend/sibling is), then I use multiple sources, especially for looking up potential side effects.
And exactly as you said, Wikipedia (and other similar sites) are good for getting an idea of what you're looking at, followed up by research on other more reputable places. So what exactly was your point? I'm not a doctor and I rarely take medication, and for lay people our most up-to-date resources are almost inevitably going to be online (just like for most medstudents using PubMed as well, actually).
EDIT: My 'source' for some of my info of general drug interactions/uses and anatomy/physiology, though, come from school.
I was curious to see where you were sourcing your information from. I just wanted to build up a picture of where people tend to look for answers. It's a good thing that, with the internet, patients are more informed and on the whole, much more proactive in managing their treatment. But I'm sure you can appreciate the challenges the medical profession sometimes faces with this - the opportunity for misinformation and bias to cloud a patient's decision, possibly to the extent of having a detrimental impact on their health.
An example of this is, to a certain degree, your misconception of the mechanisms behind the adverse effects of drugs on the GI tract. "Stomach irritation" is a very vague term. It can be caused by so many different things and manifest with so many different symptoms. NSAIDS inhibit prostaglandin production though COX1 interference. Whereas erythromycin is a motilin agonist. They both cause GI disturbances, but they do this by two entirely different mechanisms - and hence have some different defining symptoms. It's like saying a chair and a leopard are the same simply because they both have four legs.
I assumed that wikipedia (or any alternative website similar in principle) is most people's primary source of information on the internet. It would be a lie if I said I haven't used it myself, even when trying to get some work done!
Oh, we don't use "pubmed" so much over here - the UK (and quite a few other countries') physicians tend to refer to the "British National Formulary" (BNF) as their primary go to guide in clinical practice, which isn't freely available on the internet. And when it comes to academic research, we are encouraged to use "medline" rather than "pubmed" which is apparently a more tightly regulated search engine within pubmed.
"2-(4-isobutylphenyl)propionic acid" or "(RS)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid" is the IUPAC chemical name of the common analgesic drug whose generic name is: "ibuprofen." It'll be the generic names of drugs you'll be recognising, not their chemical ones, unless of course you're involved in drug design and synthesis.