Not A Puppy
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:41:18 +0000
[Ren The Ryoko]
Not A Puppy
[Ren The Ryoko]
Not A Puppy
[Ren The Ryoko]
Not A Puppy
Um, in the last book, Harry tells Ron he always loved Hermione as a sister. How much more specific were you looking for?
And at THAT point, it became ok to argue that. But to say they "always" acted like brother and sister is ridiculous, because we have no evidence that was true until that point.
Wait. By that line of reasoning, to say that stating opinions on personal relationships without EXPLICIT CONFIRMATION IN THE BOOKS is ridiculous...isn't that criticizing your own opinions about Harry and Hermione as well, since they were never confirmed?
Not at all. I dislike much of canon. I slash a lot of very odd, odd couples.
I just dislike the "like family" argument because more often than not, it's used without confirmation or reason. It's simply an easy way to bash pairing. Now, given that Harry does tell Ron that Hermione is like a sister to him in the books, it's fair to say that canonly that this is accurate from Harry's point of view. But to say that canonly Harry and Hermione were always like siblings in the book is being given an inch and taking a mile.
I didn't ask if you liked canon or not. What does that have to do with it?
Everyone has their reasons for seeing relations between the characters in the books the way they choose to. If a person sees that the behavior between Harry and Hermione is romantic, then that's their viewpoint. If they see it as behavior befitting a brother and sister, then that's also a viewpoint, and one that happens to be backed by canon.
It doesn't mean that one opinion is worth more than the other, or that one is 'ridiculous' for having correctly assumed the author's intent for the two, and having seen hints for it long before then. If you didn't see it until that line about Harry thinking of her as a sister smacked you in the nose in the last book, you obviously thought differently, and judging by this thread you WISH differently as well. Nothing wrong with that.
But to claim that others who DID see it coming are 'ridiculous' or are looking for a 'cheap way out' of liking a pairing that really only exists in a portion of fanon anyway is a little harsh. Especially when the first post of this topic says to say why you don't like the pairing in the first place.
I'm...really not a Harmony fan. I just like it more than Harry/Ginny.
My point was that nine times out of ten, when someone runs into a pairing thread screaming that "It could never happen cuz they're like family!111!" it's an unsupported, lazy rebuttal.
Especially when this thread openly admits that their pairing is, and always will remain, fanon.
Those statistics seem a little stretched, is all I'm saying. I know that whenever I claim that as my reason for not seeing a relationship between two characters, it is because there is actual interaction between them, or else a very strong vibe that i personally feel, that leans me that direction. I have yet to see anyone say that that didn't actually mean or think that, personally, and so what if there's nothing to support it? There's nothing to support this, either.
Also, the person didn't come running in screaming, from what I saw. They did what the thread asked, then left. There was little reason to shoot a 'your opinion is unfounded and ridiculous' arrow in their back as they left, except for some sort of self-validation? The extra gold for posting? I don't know, I'm not going to try and guess. Just saying that it ain't always so, even if you're under the impression that it is, and while differing opinions make the world go 'round, it can be done without utterly dismissing another person's line of reasoning in order to make your own look more logical and thought-out.
Those sort of knee-jerk reactions are a big part of the reason why most Harmonians, Sparrabethers, and Zutara fans are seen as a little 'off' in the larger parts of their respective fandom communites.
That's MY point.