AndreJB_1992
WNxLuckyXIII
AndreJB_1992
WNxLuckyXIII
To whom it may concern,
Very well, you challenge is accepted. You can either provide evidence of these claims, or you can explain to me how you're a liar and/or idiot.
Signed,
Grand Priest of Zeko
"Read back to the original posts that I first put on here. This is also proof. He is pushing MARTIAL LAW if the FREE PEOPLE will not vote in his favor.
Yes, this video is a little shaky, I will admit, but you can research the fact behind all of it. But this video puts things into perspective.
He needs more protection than any other president. Because he will fall, due to his deceptions and lies.
How are the things he is pushing not destroying our free country?
We are merely his puppets, and he is the puppeteer.
But he needs to be wary of the puppets without strings." To whom it may concern,
I asked one of two things of you. The first I asked was for you to provide evidence of your rash claims against the president. What you provided, instead, was a paranoid video which was edited to make Obama look bad (the secret meeting was from when he was running, all the bad bits are either from his opponents, most of whom can, will, and have lied to do harm to his political life, or small, unrelated bits which sound slightly relevant so they just stuck them in there) and then told me to "look it up myself." YouTube videos are not reliable sources, it is not my job to prove your point for you, and you're quickly looking more and more like either a liar or an idiot.
Signed,
Grand Priest of Zeko
"The thing, though, is that you are proving yourself to be uneducated and unwilling to be educated. I should not spoon feed you facts to persuade you.
You should make your own opinions, and not be herded like a sheep to pasture.
I should not have to prove anything. The videos I put out, yes are shaky, I've already said this, but facts can be proven by the right sources.
It is not my fault that you cannot surmise your own opinions.
It is not my fault that you do not come back with any contradictory remarks that prove that you have anything to make a debatable argument.
As for the other thing that his opponents made snide remarks, yes they did.
But these remarks were soon put to the test, and obama failed them.
You are proving yourself an unworthy debater, do to the fact that you I spoon feed you shaky videos, and then you can't even educate yourself enough to come back and make a valid argument.
Everything I have just said, is the basis that which the government plays a role in. They have control over the population, though many do not realize it.
If you cannot prove anything that is educated and not a question or contradiction on your own part, do not respond.
I have no time to waste on an uneducated person who is spoon fed shakiness, and gobbles it down, not willing to form an educated argument by researching the facts that have been shakily represented."
To whom it may concern,
Clearly, you don't know how a debate works. Allow me to educate you.
You claimed that Obama was destroying the country by taking jobs from qualified individuals and giving them to unqualified immigrants. These are bold claims, which any idiot can make, so I called BS on you. The ball is now in your court. It is your task to prove your claims true, by providing evidence. I then provide counter-evidence. You counter my counter-evidence. We continue this until one of us concedes. You failed to provide evidence. You, instead, provided opinions, and told me to do my own research, and then proceeded to attack me for not having opinions of my own.
Firstly, a YouTube video of mostly unrelated events which foresees the doom of America proves nothing. I can make videos saying the sky is green and all rabbits are made of chocolate, but it doesn't make it true. I would have excused the video if it had evidence of some kind, but there wasn't evidence of anything but a bunch of people are angry and convinced Obama's "sham" will be over by March 15th (which very well have been the March 15th which has already passed, I didn't check the date on the video).
Secondly, you are trying to make a point. You're the one who needs to provide the evidence,
not me. It is not my claim, and I should not be expected to prove it. And, since you have evidently researched these "facts" so heavily, finding evidence of them should be absolutely no problem for you. Yet you insist I look them up myself.
It is not my job to prove your point for you, it's my job to prove your point wrong.
Thirdly, you attack my own lack of research on the subject, and my own lack of opinions. This is odd to me, because I have yet to express any specific opinions on anything in this thread besides the food label for news thing and that Obama isn't destroying the country. How do you know how well researched my personal politics are when you don't know any of them?
Signed,
Grand Priest of Zeko