suiside girls vs. gods girls

which is better

suiside girls	31.6%	[ 75 ]
gods girls	15.6%	[ 37 ]
neither	52.7%	[ 125 ]
Total Votes:			[ 237 ]

[miserabelle]

Sweetened with Splenda

herr_doktor.exe

I heard that suicide girls mistreats their models and legally ******** with them and they're really greedy. a lot of the models from GG's come from suicide girls and I know that suicide girls has been steadily on the decline when it comes to alt. modeling. this is like s**t coming straight from the models' mouth - granted, I don't care about alt. modeling but I was reading some s**t that they post along with Apnea's current legal battle and it was drama and I enjoyed reading it. :3

Uh, ew.

If that's true, should SG be tracked down or shut down? I mean, no modeling/talent or any type of agency should be allowed to mistreat their employees. It kind of wants to make me say to the models, "Geez. Why the hell did you sign up for this stuff instead of an actual modeling agency? At least you'll get benefits."

p.s: according to the image examples...I don't see any actual modeling, clothing modeling.
I guess I could say for the first photo is more like an art composition. Second one is just silly.

They're not actually doing anything illegal, the girls know what their contracts say so... most of the time they can't really complain. I don't really approve of how they run their business, but legally they're entitled to go on as they are xx

[Battalia]

I personally like Burningangel.com more than God's Girls, Deviant Nation, etc. I have a big thing for Joanna Angel, though... that could be why. Also, soft-core does nothing for me... it's just boring to look at personally, but I totally respect it. I used to have a subscription to GG but now I only have my BA subscription and a subscription to Joanna Angel's site.

I LOATHE AND DEPLORE SUICIDE GIRLS. If anyone is serious about alt-porn he or she stays as far away from SG as possible. There IS an SG black-list since SG likes to throw around bogus law-suits. No one wants to work with any of their models or photographers. Not to mention, SG will accept just about anyone with bad hair and a webcam. Being one of over 1000 random girls with bad hair that gets paid a couple of hundred bucks every set isn't cool, man. I've read so many SG horror stories that it isn't even funny. Not to mention they let a set of a girl who was 7 months pregnant and smoking go live... that's just sick.

After I get some personal stuff settled I'm going to work with BA definitely and maybe a few other sites. Only a few more years. ::sigh:: sad I also need to get serious about my own site and find a server that will allow webcam feeds and not charge me an arm and a leg. Paying someone else 50% for a cam show blows and doing shows through messengers is a hassle since Paypal doesn't allow adult transactions and there is such a high rate of people who are just trying to rip a girl off.

All in all, being a soft-core alt-model for an established site won't make anyone rich on its own (the publicity helps), but it's extra spending money. To make money you have to give up more than T&A to the camera. That's just the business.

[boring suicide letters]

...
Forget the models learn how to spell suicide.
neutral

[dagon is a gloomy bear]

miserabelle

Sweetened with Splenda

herr_doktor.exe

I heard that suicide girls mistreats their models and legally ******** with them and they're really greedy. a lot of the models from GG's come from suicide girls and I know that suicide girls has been steadily on the decline when it comes to alt. modeling. this is like s**t coming straight from the models' mouth - granted, I don't care about alt. modeling but I was reading some s**t that they post along with Apnea's current legal battle and it was drama and I enjoyed reading it. :3

Uh, ew.

If that's true, should SG be tracked down or shut down? I mean, no modeling/talent or any type of agency should be allowed to mistreat their employees. It kind of wants to make me say to the models, "Geez. Why the hell did you sign up for this stuff instead of an actual modeling agency? At least you'll get benefits."

p.s: according to the image examples...I don't see any actual modeling, clothing modeling.
I guess I could say for the first photo is more like an art composition. Second one is just silly.

They're not actually doing anything illegal, the girls know what their contracts say so... most of the time they can't really complain. I don't really approve of how they run their business, but legally they're entitled to go on as they are xx

It's illegal anywhere there's a right to work law in the state.

I'm not really a fan of Deviant Nation. I dunno... Burning Angel has some neat models/porn stars. =D I also <3 Zak Sabbath.
I like the soft stuff more to just look at the girls. lol Like, hair and clothing and stuff. xd sweatdrop

Yeah, I think most of the girls on the soft sites aren't looking to earn a living from it, and they usually are totally not into the idea of doing anything hardcore anyway.
I'd consider doing a Vivid Alt film, myself. Or something by Benny Profane. But I don't live in Hollywood...

[Battalia]

`dagon

miserabelle

Sweetened with Splenda

herr_doktor.exe

I heard that suicide girls mistreats their models and legally ******** with them and they're really greedy. a lot of the models from GG's come from suicide girls and I know that suicide girls has been steadily on the decline when it comes to alt. modeling. this is like s**t coming straight from the models' mouth - granted, I don't care about alt. modeling but I was reading some s**t that they post along with Apnea's current legal battle and it was drama and I enjoyed reading it. :3

Uh, ew.

If that's true, should SG be tracked down or shut down? I mean, no modeling/talent or any type of agency should be allowed to mistreat their employees. It kind of wants to make me say to the models, "Geez. Why the hell did you sign up for this stuff instead of an actual modeling agency? At least you'll get benefits."

p.s: according to the image examples...I don't see any actual modeling, clothing modeling.
I guess I could say for the first photo is more like an art composition. Second one is just silly.

They're not actually doing anything illegal, the girls know what their contracts say so... most of the time they can't really complain. I don't really approve of how they run their business, but legally they're entitled to go on as they are xx

It's illegal anywhere there's a right to work law in the state.

I'm not really a fan of Deviant Nation. I dunno... Burning Angel has some neat models/porn stars. =D I also <3 Zak Sabbath.
I like the soft stuff more to just look at the girls. lol Like, hair and clothing and stuff. xd sweatdrop

Yeah, I think most of the girls on the soft sites aren't looking to earn a living from it, and they usually are totally not into the idea of doing anything hardcore anyway.
I'd consider doing a Vivid Alt film, myself. Or something by Benny Profane. But I don't live in Hollywood...

Vivid Alt would fly you out to LA to work, most likely. Eon Mckai and Malachi Ecks are pretty rad dudes and they're always looking for new ladies for their movies.

[LadyEffward]

You'd think people would see what bullshit SG is after the first time the owner went and sold all the models' photos as pornography, then all the original models left (Many who were around for the first tour). Now they're grabbing any girl that's willing to get royally ******** for the SG name in their resume. Even if it means fake piercings, airbrushed tattoos, going back on their standards, and still owning you for 2 years after your contract.

[Battalia]

LadyEffward

You'd think people would see what bullshit SG is after the first time the owner went and sold all the models' photos as pornography, then all the original models left (Many who were around for the first tour). Now they're grabbing any girl that's willing to get royally ******** for the SG name in their resume. Even if it means fake piercings, airbrushed tattoos, going back on their standards, and still owning you for 2 years after your contract.

Indeed, lady. Indeed.

SG is a marketing scheme now and they want to monopolize the alt-porn industry. They act like they own alt-porn when SG actually wasn't even the first alt-porn site (in this vain), Supercult was. Supercult doesn't go apeshit with advertising and Chase Lisbon is super, super picky about his models so it isn't as popular.

Punkrockgirlfriend.com was pretty bad, though (one of the sites that featured the pictures of archived models that SG sold to anyone with $500). I hate that SG preaches all this, "We're about feminine power!" s**t and then their pictures end up on sites that depict the models as "c**k hungry sluts" that "love getting it from behind." Hell, SG isn't even owned by a woman (marketing scheme), SG is owned by some rich, corporate douche nozzle. IT IS PORN. NO PORN, BE IT SOFTCORE, HARDCORE, OR PIN-UP STYLE IS GOING TO EMPOWER WOMEN. EVER.

Alt-porn sites cater to men (and lesbians?) because women aren't as interested in porn, and there are a ton of dudes that will get naked for a girl for free; girls just don't have to pay for it. Not to mention it has been proven that most women are aroused the most by touch whereas men are aroused more by sight. I really wish people would stop with the whole feminist angle on all of this because it makes absolutely no sense. Don't get me wrong, I love porn and I love working in the industry, but I'm honest with myself about it. I'm getting naked and doing stuff for other people to get aroused, that's all it comes down to in porn.

...eh, I'm going to stop ranting for now.

[Specialist Graner]

both suck, burning angel is better than both of them.

[CACTUS QUEEN 18]

neither..

[Angelus_Draco]

John PeePee

Suicide girls were "alive" first
God's girls is like off-brand suicide girls

suicide girls is more pretty
gods girls is just porn

Suicide girls has only proffesional models

god's girls takes anyone

Yeah right! Suicide girls website just looks prettier

[Angelus_Draco]

Khymaera

professionalpineapple

I had no idea who God's Girls were, but they seem like SG rejects to me.


Silly wanabees. I didn't even know SG turned people down.

Lmao. Are you serious? Some of SG's most renowned models like Apnea, moved to GG after the SG controversy.

here here!

[Fairee Lumineuse]

What's a suicide girl and a god girl?

[dagon is a gloomy bear]

Angelus_Draco

John PeePee

Suicide girls were "alive" first
God's girls is like off-brand suicide girls

suicide girls is more pretty
gods girls is just porn

Suicide girls has only proffesional models

god's girls takes anyone

Yeah right! Suicide girls website just looks prettier

I will agree that the SG site is like the orgasm equivalent of page coding... mmmm...

Burning Angel is awesome, but it's porn and videos too so it's not quite the same kind of site anyway.

[delete_my_existence]

suicide girls don't get to work to anyone else but suicide girls. :S
I think that's not fair.

never heard of the Gods girls though.