suiside girls vs. gods girls

which is better

suiside girls	31.6%	[ 75 ]
gods girls	15.6%	[ 37 ]
neither	52.7%	[ 125 ]
Total Votes:			[ 237 ]

[Mobster Lobster]

Alternative softcore porn sites.

Are there any like that that have men?

[XXX Zombie Porn]

I dont like either. I hate the fact they use fake tattoos and clip on piercings.
Theres nothing special about eithr.

[lilartichoke]

Mobster Lobster

Alternative softcore porn sites.

Are there any like that that have men?

lulz.
nice.

[D a m n i t Mercy]

All of it is really lame to me

neutral

[[Illegible]]

they both fail. biggrin

[smiling conclusion]

2nd pic, girl on the right:

Is something wrong with her back? Or did they like, photoshop cleavage on her back?

That's demented.

[Disco Slut]

A few personal differences:

SG actually turns me on.
GG... I've never actually went to the site.
So therefore, in my ignorant opinion, SG is better.
;3

[dagon is a gloomy bear]

Evoluti

John PeePee

Suicide girls were "alive" first
God's girls is like off-brand suicide girls

suicide girls is more pretty
gods girls is just porn

Suicide girls has only proffesional models

god's girls takes anyone

... Only Professional Models? You have to be ******** kidding me.

He doesn't know what he's talking about, obviously.

Anyway...

Suicide Girls was around first and had more integrity back in the day, but then they got mainstream and rich and corrupt. Now they accept pretty much any girls who aren't a total ugmo even if they aren't living or looking like an alternative lifestyle. They have a scam of a contract and ******** over many of their own models. They harass and attack other businesses. They are bullies. They pretend to sell it as "grrl power" and then back track on saying that, even though it's written all over the site. But because they are more well known they get more money, more views, which is good for the models, and can offer other things like the tour and shows and merch. There are some really hot girls, but you have to go through so many not too great ones to find them.

Gods Girls came later. They said straight up that they are just selling puss. They are a lot picker about their models so there are all more attractive in general. They do accept non alt girls too though. Their contract reflects what they saw was so wrong with the SG one. (I also believe they pay more per set, but it keeps changing between the two sites, I'm not 100% sure what it is right now.) Their photo quality is on par with SG and they update twice as often.

Both are soft core porn. Usually clothed to nude sets. GodsGirls seems to have raunchier girl/girl sets. But neither allow penetration or extreme erotica.

[cherry flavored pocky.]

Suicide Girls likes to sue their models who try to model for other people and they also like to sue photographers who photograph their models.
Gods Girls doesn't care who photographs their models.

[Evoluti]

`dagon

Evoluti

John PeePee

Suicide girls were "alive" first
God's girls is like off-brand suicide girls

suicide girls is more pretty
gods girls is just porn

Suicide girls has only proffesional models

god's girls takes anyone

... Only Professional Models? You have to be ******** kidding me.

He doesn't know what he's talking about, obviously.

Anyway...

Suicide Girls was around first and had more integrity back in the day, but then they got mainstream and rich and corrupt. Now they accept pretty much any girls who aren't a total ugmo even if they aren't living or looking like an alternative lifestyle. They have a scam of a contract and ******** over many of their own models. They harass and attack other businesses. They are bullies. They pretend to sell it as "grrl power" and then back track on saying that, even though it's written all over the site. But because they are more well known they get more money, more views, which is good for the models, and can offer other things like the tour and shows and merch. There are some really hot girls, but you have to go through so many not too great ones to find them.

Gods Girls came later. They said straight up that they are just selling puss. They are a lot picker about their models so there are all more attractive in general. They do accept non alt girls too though. Their contract reflects what they saw was so wrong with the SG one. (I also believe they pay more per set, but it keeps changing between the two sites, I'm not 100% sure what it is right now.) Their photo quality is on par with SG and they update twice as often.

Both are soft core porn. Usually clothed to nude sets. GodsGirls seems to have raunchier girl/girl sets. But neither allow penetration or extreme erotica.

You sure do know your soft core porn industry don't you ;DD

[dagon is a gloomy bear]

._. I've been an applicant to both sites (and many others). I've been doing serious thinking about breaking into hardcore as well.
I also like to look at it. Hahaha.

[Kobaby]

I like the idea of both but they sort of fail . they take any girl with percings and think shes pretty in an alternative way. Half the girls are flat chested, chubby, pale and look like AIDS patients.

[TREE SWEATER]

Criminy, anyone with a scene mullet and a fake piercing is an 'alternative model' now, aren't they? talk2hand

[LaLunaLupe]

I'm not sure I consider either group models unless they're modeling tattoos. Kinda seems like porn to me, so I'm just going to not click on any links.

[iFeared]

i prefer gods girls hands down

heart