Immortality PICTURES

[Wholly Undeserving of God]

so the ultimate purpose in having life is to make more

it makes no sense

life will come to an end no matter what sphere in time
all life
its so improbable that general physical "life" will continue indefinitely that its bordering on logical fallacy

forget it you dont understand what i'm trying to say.

[early bedtime]

FinchforM

so the ultimate purpose in having life is to make more

it makes no sense

life will come to an end no matter what sphere in time
all life
its so improbable that general physical "life" will continue indefinitely that its bordering on logical fallacy

forget it you dont understand what i'm trying to say.

it's so widely accepted that the ultimate, biological purpose for life is to procreate
yes it's a pretty meaningless existance, since you're only living to create offspring, which will only live to create more offspring.
but everything points in that direction.
it's said that our stone-age ancestors began to have children at around 20, and see them off at around 55. that's when they could die with out "damaging our reproductive success"
while organisms are young, the bad genes are weeded out with things like natural selection, but once we breed, it doesnt matter who dies, because the ultimate goal has been completed, and our systems can begin to deteriorate.

nope i sure dont

[Wholly Undeserving of God]

early bedtime

FinchforM

so the ultimate purpose in having life is to make more

it makes no sense

life will come to an end no matter what sphere in time
all life
its so improbable that general physical "life" will continue indefinitely that its bordering on logical fallacy

forget it you dont understand what i'm trying to say.

it's so widely accepted that the ultimate, biological purpose for life is to procreate
yes it's a pretty meaningless existance, since you're only living to create offspring, which will only live to create more offspring.
but everything points in that direction.
it's said that our stone-age ancestors began to have children at around 20, and see them off at around 55. that's when they could die with out "damaging our reproductive success"
while organisms are young, the bad genes are weeded out with things like natural selection, but once we breed, it doesnt matter who dies, because the ultimate goal has been completed, and our systems can begin to deteriorate.

nope i sure dont

you lost my faith when you said "widely accepted"

[early bedtime]

FinchforM

early bedtime

FinchforM

so the ultimate purpose in having life is to make more

it makes no sense

life will come to an end no matter what sphere in time
all life
its so improbable that general physical "life" will continue indefinitely that its bordering on logical fallacy

forget it you dont understand what i'm trying to say.

it's so widely accepted that the ultimate, biological purpose for life is to procreate
yes it's a pretty meaningless existance, since you're only living to create offspring, which will only live to create more offspring.
but everything points in that direction.
it's said that our stone-age ancestors began to have children at around 20, and see them off at around 55. that's when they could die with out "damaging our reproductive success"
while organisms are young, the bad genes are weeded out with things like natural selection, but once we breed, it doesnt matter who dies, because the ultimate goal has been completed, and our systems can begin to deteriorate.

nope i sure dont

i'm doin hw, surfing the web, typing with one hand, and arguing about silly things with you
cut me some slack man

you lost my faith when you said "widely accepted"

[Wholly Undeserving of God]

slack cut

[Envy the Clown]

Yay, science.