Global Warming Has Been Refuted

[Mathematical Trickery]

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

Lawl @ IPCC.

That's what this thread is about, dingbat. rolleyes

The Internal Conflict Doesn't Erase the Data. The Issue is That IPCC was Cockblocking Via Peer Review. It Doesn't Change things Like the Largest Fresh Water Lake in the Ice Flows Cracked and Drained into the Ocean. It Doesn't Change the Fact That An Increase in Fresh Water in the Ocean Changes Things. Need I remind Everyone Of El Nino? Nor Does it Change the Fact that We Have Been Getting more Severe Hurricanes and Storms. New Orleans, People. We Can See the Affect. You Are Trying to Claim They're Lying About the Cause. Like a Rise in Global Temperature. Except That People Can See the Results.

You Said it Snowed Early in Texas? That Is a Sign Global Warming. Just Like The Snow Arizona Got a Few Years. Or The Black Christmas Canada Got. Or the Fact That A Bunch of Coastal Areas Were Burried Under a Ton of Snow and Ice.

Proof that they are linked?

You're Asking me to Prove That An Increase In Temperature is Related to Ice Melting?
Are You Retarded?

I obviously wasn't talking about that. You mentioned many points.
Are You Retarded?

[DrCongressmanPHD]

Even if you want to ignore global warming can you ignore the fact that resources are finite?

[DrCongressmanPHD]

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

DrCongressmanPHD

Even if you want to ignore global warming can you ignore the fact that resources are finite?

In America You Can Ignore Everything.

That's already so sadly apparent.

[Mathematical Trickery]

DrCongressmanPHD

Even if you want to ignore global warming can you ignore the fact that resources are finite?

???


That's obvious. There is a NEED to develop alternative energies and reduce pollution.
I disagree with the global warming religion, however.

[Mathematical Trickery]

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

Lawl @ IPCC.

That's what this thread is about, dingbat. rolleyes

The Internal Conflict Doesn't Erase the Data. The Issue is That IPCC was Cockblocking Via Peer Review. It Doesn't Change things Like the Largest Fresh Water Lake in the Ice Flows Cracked and Drained into the Ocean. It Doesn't Change the Fact That An Increase in Fresh Water in the Ocean Changes Things. Need I remind Everyone Of El Nino? Nor Does it Change the Fact that We Have Been Getting more Severe Hurricanes and Storms. New Orleans, People. We Can See the Affect. You Are Trying to Claim They're Lying About the Cause. Like a Rise in Global Temperature. Except That People Can See the Results.

You Said it Snowed Early in Texas? That Is a Sign Global Warming. Just Like The Snow Arizona Got a Few Years. Or The Black Christmas Canada Got. Or the Fact That A Bunch of Coastal Areas Were Burried Under a Ton of Snow and Ice.

Proof that they are linked?

You're Asking me to Prove That An Increase In Temperature is Related to Ice Melting?
Are You Retarded?

I obviously wasn't talking about that. You mentioned many points.
Are You Retarded?

Then What Were You Talking About, Mr. Obvious?

The other points you made, dipshit.

[DrCongressmanPHD]

Mathematical Trickery

DrCongressmanPHD

Even if you want to ignore global warming can you ignore the fact that resources are finite?

???


That's obvious. There is a NEED to develop alternative energies and reduce pollution.
I disagree with the global warming religion, however.

Then why even worry about whether global warming is true or not and actually focus on the problem which is reducing pollution and finding renewable resources, limit our consumption etc.

Also lol at the "religion" thing. If you get any more obvious I am calling troll.




I had to type "quasimilitary drools" to make this post.

[Mathematical Trickery]

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

Proof that they are linked?

You're Asking me to Prove That An Increase In Temperature is Related to Ice Melting?
Are You Retarded?

I obviously wasn't talking about that. You mentioned many points.
Are You Retarded?

Then What Were You Talking About, Mr. Obvious?

The other points you made, dipshit.

You Need me to Prove Glaciers are Made of Fresh Water? Or That New Orleans Was Hit By A Hurricane?

You Need Help.

Srsly.

The Link Between Global Warming and Hurricane Katrina, For Example. Let's Start With That One.
How Man Caused Hurricane Katrina.

[Zentric]

On the whole email "climategate" thing and some other stuff:

http://www.cracked.com/forums/topic/30174/has-global-warming-stopped/220

Quote:

This is a huge deal in the blogosphere where the evironmentalists and the AGW denialists like to have their flame wars, but it will mean nothing at the level where policy is made. The glaciers are melting. The rainfall patterns are changing. The snow caps are disappearing from mountain ranges. The Northwest passage is open. The tundra is thawing. That part of the debate is over everywhere except among the Ann Coulter types and a pool of denialist blogs. This is sport for them, and nothing more.

This is no longer about listening to some crazed environmentalists screaming about catastrophe. This is about nations who know they're going to lose some coast land and trying to figure out how they can balance cutting carbon with keeping their economies going. But tempest in a teapot stuff like this is only good for giving bloggers something to blog about.

Quote:

No data was manipulated. They were talking about how to present it in a graph.

The raw data is repeated by researchers around the globe, it's been peer reviewed, there is no indication any of it has been falsified, ever.

Quote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khikoh3sJg8

A scientist who FIRMLY BELIEVES IN GLOBAL WARMING says something to the effect of, "some people might look at the data and think we're in for a cooling period. They're dead wrong." Right-wing commentators and oil lobbyists edit out the "they're dead wrong" part and tell the media that a leading IPCC scientist has changed his mind on global warming. In days, every right-wing talk show host is quoting it, and the BBC article is written.

Pure, bald-faced, evil lie. A lie that could kill millions.

You can form your own opinions on the data, you can disbelieve the experts. But to take a scientist who says we're driving off a cliff, and intentionally put words in his mouth to say we're not, specificaly so that we'll keep driving off the cliff...

I honestly can't comprehend evil on that level. I just can't. It's insane. It's psychotic. It's sociopathic. It's sawing off your own hand just because you don't like the tone of voice someone took when they told you not to.

All of these quotes are from David Wong, a very smart man.

Thought these would be interesting.

[Mathematical Trickery]

Citation plz.

[My_Aequitas]

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

The Real PC Troll XIIIXD

Mathematical Trickery

I obviously wasn't talking about that. You mentioned many points.
Are You Retarded?

Then What Were You Talking About, Mr. Obvious?

The other points you made, dipshit.

You Need me to Prove Glaciers are Made of Fresh Water? Or That New Orleans Was Hit By A Hurricane?

You Need Help.

Srsly.

The Link Between Global Warming and Hurricane Katrina, For Example. Let's Start With That One.
How Man Caused Hurricane Katrina.