soilder of raze
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:13:13 +0000
Sparkyperson
Ansel Pendragon
Sparkyperson
Ansel Pendragon
Sparkyperson
And theres my problem right there. I don't feel violent games should be banned, but age restrictions need to be followed through.
I feel immoral that anyone under the age of 10 should have any access to that kind of violence. Why the hell would you need it then? Thats the growing up "Lol, lets go play outside" age. Soon as you hit 10, medium violence seems fair, soon as your 14, no amount of violence seems immoral.
I feel immoral that anyone under the age of 10 should have any access to that kind of violence. Why the hell would you need it then? Thats the growing up "Lol, lets go play outside" age. Soon as you hit 10, medium violence seems fair, soon as your 14, no amount of violence seems immoral.
Age restriction is more of the parents job, isn't it? Or is the job of being a parent and actually watching over the kids so hard and so complicated that cooperations need to do it for them?
Theres just no need for Halo, GTA and the likes that early. There's no peer pressure at that age (and if there is, that only more proves my point), and no real need for high levels of violence that early. Tekken or Mortal Kombat style violence at that age is fine, but MGS and GTA style violence is out of the question.
Your ignorant to my point as well. I am not saying its right or wrong because it is not my kid we are taking about (not that I have one) I am saying it is up to the parents. Not you, not the government, just the parents.
Your pointlessly targeting a small minority of parents who are either too stupid or dont care about their children enough to check the age restrictions.
but you are the one who is saying that no kid should play it and I believe it is up to the parent
he is simply saying if he becomes a parent he will let his kids play