Iampoa
the_true_iori
Generally you edit the initial post rather than quoting a second one then editing it.
I am contributing to the thread, that's how posting works. If you [incorrectly] inferred that I wanted to start a fight based on my critique of your flawed point then that is your fault not mine. Generally if one of the fundamental premises of the discussion is flawed, the results of that discussion are invalid. I'm implying (well, I'm pretty close to outright stating) that you are incorrect in your assessment and therefore your 'discussion' will yield no valid results.
You'll have to clarify how my assessment was 'short sighted' since I'm pretty darn sure it wasn't.
As an aside, Your 'discussion' is basically a poll. In the old days, topics that could be answered with a yes/no question were considered off topic and moved to the CB or GD.
And worth is economic value is a huge factor in certain parts of the community. The Gaia Exchange is likely the most obvious example of this but it's also common in the GCD and, to a lesser extent some of the role playing forums.
Of course it is also pretty much the sole purpose of the avatar talk forum but that would be cheating.
Mistakes can be made, it happens. Do you feel better for being insulting? Because you made such a simple statement the first time, it was viewed as being short-sighted. You didn't explain anything which could give people the wrong idea. That is your fault, don't say you had nothing to do with a misunderstanding because of one of your posts caused a spark. Rather than imply something, come out and say it. Say what you mean so there isn't any miscommunication. A question was asked, and there are responses.
This does talk about avatars, but this topic wouldn't be allowed in places such as the Exchange, or the Avatar Talk sub-forum. This pertains to the community and how it perceives other users. Pardon me? Showing incredulous doubt is not being insulting (as a fun aside, I personally think that dismissively calling someone short-sighted and implying that they are an elitist IS insulting).
I'm not sure where you're getting your definitions from but 'short-sighted' demonstrates a lack of foresight or ability to plan ahead while 'simple' just describes a lack of complexity. "this plan won't work in the long run" is a very simple statement but is probably not short-sighted. In fact, it was this confusion of terms that prompted me to ask for clarification. When I don't understand something I ask for an explanation (ANOTHER fun aside: I don't dismissively call something I don't understand 'short-sighted' and then refuse to try to respond to it).
You are [partially] correct. While I did not explain my point I did not feel that it warranted the need of explanation. As you said, it was simple and therefore I did not assume that it would require clarification. Would you rather I continue all my further posts as if I were speaking to a nine year old? Personally I would find that demeaning for both parties involved but if you think it would clear up miscommunication I'd be[grudgingly] be willing to try it out.
In keeping with your spark metaphor, would you blame the matchstick maker for the fire one of his clients caused? If, for example, I was to infer from your post that you are prejudiced against me because of the color of my skin and then took it personally, perhaps alleging that you are a filthy racist and that you should be banned for practicing and propagating hate, would that be your fault? It was YOUR post that caused the spark (ie: my offense to your post) but really, it would be my incorrect inference of your meaning based on a lack of understanding and lack of desire to clarify that confusion that really caused the problem.
As a final fun aside, that last paragraph of mine, describing how 'worth in economic value' (a typo I only just noticed on my part, my apologies for that) is a large part of many parts of Gaia was actually my attempt to respond to the initial issue that The Power of Alchemy raised. It was actually a more on topic post than your response, which contributed nothing to the topic at hand and could very easily have been PM'd to me without disrupting the intended purpose of this thread.
Finally, to answer your initial question: I'd guess I feel about as much better for 'being insulting' than I imagine you feel for being unnecessarily indignant.