DlCK CATSTY
Kiumaru
DlCK CATSTY
Kiumaru
DlCK CATSTY
About as relevant as ZImmerman's is.
Well, it's relevant if Zimmerman is supposedly racist.
There's a difference between "delinquent past" and "racist past". As a "delinquent past" doesn't actually mean you committed a crime whereas a "racist past" could mean that, since Zimmerman shot Trayvon to death, that he did so for racist motives.
Read accounts of what actually happened and come back.
What do you want me to pull from it? Your posts which seem to focus a lot on what Zimmerman says?
Honestly, you seem to take the naive view that Zimmerman or the police couldn't lie. Of course, Trayvon's family could be lying as well but we cannot really tell which side was telling the truth.
The only fact that we really know is that Trayvon was unarmed (and, really, your charge that he stole from the 7-11 is unsubstantiated. Even if you don't have a receipt, it doesn't mean that you stole from the store. I, for instance, throw away receipts if I feel that I'm going to eat/drink what I bought [which would be what I would do if I bought skittles and tea]).
We also know that
according to the police report Zimmerman had a bloody nose and a gash on the back of his head as well as the back of his sweater was wet and had grass on it
from laying on his back while Trayvon was on top of his punching him in the face.I made the only important part of your statement there red and bold, so you'd be able to see it. According to police reports, he did. According to surveillance videos, photographs, phone calls, and ******** LOGIC, he's full of s**t, trying to cover his a** because he shot an innocent kid. You are failing to convince anyone. The facts remain: No evidence of the so-called "assault" on surveillance videos that night, no investigation to make sure Zimmerman's stories lined up (which they do not--you notice how often he changes his story?), 911 phone calls in which TRAYVON (not Zimmerman, TRAYVON) is heard screaming for help, Zimmerman disobeying police orders to not follow Trayvon, and a dead teenager shot by Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman "wannabe cop" and vigilante who called 911 regularly for reasons that no one took seriously because they aren't crimes.
As for the police report, pigs can't lie? Bullshit. I've seen a greater ratio of cops lie than "regular" people, and that's saying something. People can lie under oath--if it were physically impossible, there wouldn't be courts and trials in the first place because they would be unnecessary. Cops, while supposedly acting in "protection of the community", also act in self-interest.
If they were to admit that they botched the investigation, they would be fired and may become outcasts in their community for letting the murder of a 17-year-old kid go. They feel they have to cover up, because I give you fair odds if they didn't, they'd never work as police again. Think this is purely speculation? Look at the part of your last argument I colored orange. There is no evidence of that ever happening besides Zimmerman's testimony. So, your arguments in general are based purely on your interpretation of events and Zimmerman's ever-changing story, both of which are in my book considered "speculation."
Give us real, solid evidence that Zimmerman is innocent. I'd like to hear it. Because so far, you're just talking in circles and using falsified evidence to make a point that in and of itself is flawed. Zimmerman killed Trayvon. It's as simple as that.
[/thread]