World wide strike

[Jaishirri]

Teshna

TheVoiceOfTheLobster

Teshna

TheVoiceOfTheLobster

I don't get it...How exactly would you be protesting?

By not working.
Zero workers = total collapse of the entire system.

...in theory, that is.

There'll always be scabs.

Enough to support the entire workforce?

You are never going to get the entire workforce to protest against going to work. They'd all get fired and they'll hire someone else.

[George Kapland Sr]

Teshna

Rocket Marine

I predict that these idiots will get very few followers and produce no effect what so ever.

They already have many.

A couple thousand isn't many dumbass.


6 Billion.

That's a lot.


2,000 snot nosed brats online, there's more substance in a cup of my urine.

[lost_for_word]

Basic problem is that this idea or movement has no concept, so discussing it is pointless and impossible...Such huge change can not be provided with protesting on streets...

[Akira Fudoh]

Teshna

I was surfing around, and came across this:

From http://yabanji.tripod.com/id10.html

Quote:

If you agree that the abolition of money would be a fine solution to most of our problems, and that we could create a much better system where EVERYTHING - food and drink, clothing and housing, water, heating, education, health-care and entertainment - shall be FREE for EVERYONE - why not join the World-Wide Strike on the opening day of the Olympic Games in 2012?

The Strike will begin the moment the symbolic Olympic flame is lit - the signal for all who support the abolition of money to stop work and demand a new fair world of true freedom and justice.

WE WANT A MONEYLESS WORLD

It already has many followers, so its effect will be great.

A worldwide strike of every profession could lead to total anarchy. If we don't prepare for this one way or another, it could make matters much worse than the problems they intend to fix.

its so ignorant its sad.

[Aegis Cipher]

So, you want a new shirt, because your old ones are getting raggy, right?

Well, to make a Shirt, you need Cotton, Polyester, and workers to make it.

To get cotton, you need cotton plants, and farmers, and to get polyester, you need the machines to make it, and the people to run the machines.

To get cotton plants, you need someone to plant the seeds, but who is going to want to do the work of planting the seeds, when they will get nothing in return?

And who will want to run the machines?

Does this mean if you want a new shirt, you'll go out and plant your own cotton, harvest it, and sew it into a shirt?

Humans naturally want something for what they do, like kids, they want money or gifts for doing their chores.

[Torrent_Of_Octane]

Communism?