World Peace.

[Repellant]

MarlboroMurder

Repellant

MarlboroMurder

World Peace Is Totally Impossible. It's A Nice Thought But Nice thoughts Are Usually Impossible.
The Only Way That Could Happen Is If Everyone Were To Completely Coexist, With No Authority. Anarchy If You Will. Which Is Impossible In Itself, Because No One Answers To Anyone, And You'll Have That One Mother ******** Who Decides He Can Kill Someone Else. So then People Don't Like That, And Someone Else Decides they Now Have The Authority to Stop People Like Him, and then It Turns Into An Organization And Then People Like this Idea, And Make More Organizations, And The World Ends Up Being Split Into Countries Under Them Again, And they Piss Eachother Off. Peace Gone. So No. World Peace Is A No Go. It's Just Not Human Nature.

Congratulations, you just displayed a complete lack of knowledge about Anarchy and topped it off with an appeal to nature fallacy.

Well then Correct Me, Will You? In My Eyes Anarchy Is Not Necessarily Chaos, It's The Idea Of Everyone Being Able To Coexist Peacefully Without Government. And Fallacy? It's Just Not Human Nature to Get Along. Which Makes The Anarchy, Or at Least my Perspective Of It,Wwhich Differs To Every Different Person, Impossible. Where Was I Wrong?

I'll need peer reviewed data supporting how it is not human "nature" to get along. Furthermore, I don't know of any concept of anarchy that includes the word "peacefully" in its manifesto. And please explain what particular brand of Anarchism you attacked.

[DishPit Hero]

Repellant

MarlboroMurder

Repellant

MarlboroMurder

World Peace Is Totally Impossible. It's A Nice Thought But Nice thoughts Are Usually Impossible.
The Only Way That Could Happen Is If Everyone Were To Completely Coexist, With No Authority. Anarchy If You Will. Which Is Impossible In Itself, Because No One Answers To Anyone, And You'll Have That One Mother ******** Who Decides He Can Kill Someone Else. So then People Don't Like That, And Someone Else Decides they Now Have The Authority to Stop People Like Him, and then It Turns Into An Organization And Then People Like this Idea, And Make More Organizations, And The World Ends Up Being Split Into Countries Under Them Again, And they Piss Eachother Off. Peace Gone. So No. World Peace Is A No Go. It's Just Not Human Nature.

Congratulations, you just displayed a complete lack of knowledge about Anarchy and topped it off with an appeal to nature fallacy.

Well then Correct Me, Will You? In My Eyes Anarchy Is Not Necessarily Chaos, It's The Idea Of Everyone Being Able To Coexist Peacefully Without Government. And Fallacy? It's Just Not Human Nature to Get Along. Which Makes The Anarchy, Or at Least my Perspective Of It,Wwhich Differs To Every Different Person, Impossible. Where Was I Wrong?

I'll need peer reviewed data supporting how it is not human "nature" to get along. Furthermore, I don't know of any concept of anarchy that includes the word "peacefully" in its manifesto. And please explain what particular brand of Anarchism you attacked.

Go Shawty, It's Your Birthday
Go Party It's Your Birthday

I Can't Find Any Sources. I Was In my Sociology Textbook, The Good That Does Now. But It's Called Peaceful Anarchism Or Idealist Anarchism. It's the Theory that Everyone Could Coexist Peacefully Without Selfishness, Government Or Economy. I Can't Really Explain It, It's A Hard Concept To Grasp.

I Wasn't Invited But It's Okay
I'll Stay Home And Play Some Video Games

Enie Menie Minie Mo
So Much Bitches At Our Shows
Different State A Different Ho
Which Of Them Should I Take Home?

[Saphir3 z y d r a t e]

i think its capable of happening. with a government of hippies.

[Dargshmargit]

MarlboroMurder

I Can't Find Any Sources. I Was In my Sociology Textbook, The Good That Does Now. But It's Called Peaceful Anarchism Or Idealist Anarchism. It's the Theory that Everyone Could Coexist Peacefully Without Selfishness, Government Or Economy. I Can't Really Explain It, It's A Hard Concept To Grasp.

Please learn to capitalize properly.

I see the insult wars that are incessant in this forum have begun. People, you are why world peace will never exist. Think of it that way. The Internet.

[JakVanity]

No Point.
World Peace can never exist.
The Human race is too ignorant.

[MICHELLADA]

I feel that we do need world peace peace is one of the things thats making the world slowly die and it doesn't just hurt the earth but it also hurts everyone on it! I strongly beleive that we should all be friends and stay lovable!! 3nodding

[Skaargoroth]

The word "World Peace" makes me think of that Simpson episode where the family get one wish each. Of course, Lisa wishes for World Peace and the world burns their guns and are happy, singing songs. Then the aliens attack the world and then they blame Lisa for the whole thing.

[Dragonfreak47]

I'm a big fan of world peace.
Really, if someone could come to me with one good reason that both parties should agree to a war, I've got a hat that I'll eat.

Right now, I think world culture is just too martial, having been reinforced by millennia of bloodshed and conflict.

But, I don't believe that's the way things have to be. I believe with all my heart, world peace isn't just a possibility, it's a necessity.

[Dargshmargit]

MICHELLADA

I feel that we do need world peace peace is one of the things thats making the world slowly die and it doesn't just hurt the earth but it also hurts everyone on it! I strongly beleive that we should all be friends and stay lovable!! 3nodding

People like you make me happy, no matter how Interwebz your grammar. Thank you for existing.

[324567890sx]

not possible.

[Magisha]

I feel world peace, as of now, is not possible. It's not IMpossible, but at this rate, there are doubts. Everyone has a different opinion and belief. As these things become voiced to others, it begins conflict. Beliefs bring conflict, conflict brings violence, violence begins war.

Laws help "enforce" peace in society, but then again, these rules can be broken. And once rules are broken, peace is not possible.

I hope that one day we can live in this world in harmony and in peace, but it won't be a quick fix. World peace is too broad to accomplish, but with small goals, it could be possible. C:

[Dargshmargit]

Huh. Well, it's really the people that are the problem. If we could just teach everyone in the world to accept that others will have different opinions, but that they should just be happy for them and not respond negatively, we'll have a chance at peace. Of course, teaching something like that to everyone in the world would be quite a task.

[Sexual Liberationist]

As in the Republic, if you got a people with a state level of organization who can't live within the means of their region, there will be war. As long as the US is only 5% of the people, but consumes 25% of the resources, the US will continue to have the world's biggest military to extract resources from around the world...

[Macaroni Junior]

It will never exist. Ever. Those who believe so are all on stuff stronger than what I'm on and if you know me well that's a pretty strong statement. gonk

[Kakubunretsu]

Human nature dictates that anything should be done to achieve one's goals. It also dictates that diplomacy is inefficient, evolutionarily counterintuitive and for pussies. Thus, war is the natural method of conflict resolution.