Women: Do you wish guys had more "Balls"?

[EmotionallyInconsistent]

Requiem of the Exodus

EmotionallyInconsistent

Actually a less domineering/assertive guy is probably less likely to shout nasty dehumanizing and overlty nasty sexual things to me while I'm on my way to shop, work, walk the kids or pets or anywhere else. neutral

Domineering and Assertive are different things. A domineering man is more likely to do those things then an assertive one. Also I'm talking in a deep personal or romantic level, not casually.

I see what you mean, but the difference is getting hard to spot. neutral

[gahad]

Your the ******** abuser lousy son of a b***h whore stop complaining emo. do us a favor ******** off.!

[I got bored one day]

Why are you so interested in submission anyway? You keep repeating it.

[Requiem of the Exodus]

Death and Misery

Why are you so interested in submission anyway? You keep repeating it.

Because the conversation was mainly about whether submission was a female trait.

[Veolin]

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Ive seen a mix of both so to say all men need more balls is a no. I don't think a guy should roll over and play dead, but at the same time I don't think it should be taken to the extreme of controlling.

Case in point, consider a friend of my husbands. He is currently getting divorced and is even going to so far as to harm his new relationship by demanding complete control and submission. Even going so far as placing double standards where as he can do no wrong and the female is always wrong. Even most of his guy friends have openly stated that he shouldn't be allowed to be in a relationship. Period. One reason being because he pushes it almost to a point of abuse.

But in relation to my husband and myself, we treat our relationship as a partnership. There are areas where he is definitely the man of the household, but he doesn't take it so far as to not consider my feelings or treat me subservient, rather I have just as much say in our home as he does. We each strive to make up for what the other may lack and better each other and our relationship in that way. It's balance instead of control.

What about his level of submission to you? Is that also in a healthy balance?

I have never forced him to be sub-servant to me, and he has not asked that I be sub-servant to him. So I suppose that any subservience that has come about in our relationship has been by our own accord in relation to considering each others feelings, and having a level of respect for each other. So yes, I would say so.

But to elaborate, I never tell my husband he absolutely can't do something unless it puts our family as a whole, or our daughter specifically, in danger or would leave her without things she needs. And besides that, any restrictions that have ever been placed on him have just as equally been placed on me as well and visa versa. I like him being the dominant in our household and he often gets the final say in almost everything, but there is also a level of respect and consideration that he has given me in return where as we approach decisions together and run our household together.

[Requiem of the Exodus]

Veolin

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Ive seen a mix of both so to say all men need more balls is a no. I don't think a guy should roll over and play dead, but at the same time I don't think it should be taken to the extreme of controlling.

Case in point, consider a friend of my husbands. He is currently getting divorced and is even going to so far as to harm his new relationship by demanding complete control and submission. Even going so far as placing double standards where as he can do no wrong and the female is always wrong. Even most of his guy friends have openly stated that he shouldn't be allowed to be in a relationship. Period. One reason being because he pushes it almost to a point of abuse.

But in relation to my husband and myself, we treat our relationship as a partnership. There are areas where he is definitely the man of the household, but he doesn't take it so far as to not consider my feelings or treat me subservient, rather I have just as much say in our home as he does. We each strive to make up for what the other may lack and better each other and our relationship in that way. It's balance instead of control.

What about his level of submission to you? Is that also in a healthy balance?

I have never forced him to be sub-servant to me, and he has not asked that I be sub-servant to him. So I suppose that any subservience that has come about in our relationship has been by our own accord in relation to considering each others feelings, and having a level of respect for each other. So yes, I would say so.

But to elaborate, I never tell my husband he absolutely can't do something unless it puts our family as a whole, or our daughter specifically, in danger or would leave her without things she needs. And besides that, any restrictions that have ever been placed on him have just as equally been placed on me as well and visa versa. I like him being the dominant in our household and he often gets the final say in almost everything, but there is also a level of respect and consideration that he has given me in return where as we approach decisions together and run our household together.

Thanks, you been a big help.

[Veolin]

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Ive seen a mix of both so to say all men need more balls is a no. I don't think a guy should roll over and play dead, but at the same time I don't think it should be taken to the extreme of controlling.

Case in point, consider a friend of my husbands. He is currently getting divorced and is even going to so far as to harm his new relationship by demanding complete control and submission. Even going so far as placing double standards where as he can do no wrong and the female is always wrong. Even most of his guy friends have openly stated that he shouldn't be allowed to be in a relationship. Period. One reason being because he pushes it almost to a point of abuse.

But in relation to my husband and myself, we treat our relationship as a partnership. There are areas where he is definitely the man of the household, but he doesn't take it so far as to not consider my feelings or treat me subservient, rather I have just as much say in our home as he does. We each strive to make up for what the other may lack and better each other and our relationship in that way. It's balance instead of control.

What about his level of submission to you? Is that also in a healthy balance?

I have never forced him to be sub-servant to me, and he has not asked that I be sub-servant to him. So I suppose that any subservience that has come about in our relationship has been by our own accord in relation to considering each others feelings, and having a level of respect for each other. So yes, I would say so.

But to elaborate, I never tell my husband he absolutely can't do something unless it puts our family as a whole, or our daughter specifically, in danger or would leave her without things she needs. And besides that, any restrictions that have ever been placed on him have just as equally been placed on me as well and visa versa. I like him being the dominant in our household and he often gets the final say in almost everything, but there is also a level of respect and consideration that he has given me in return where as we approach decisions together and run our household together.

Thanks, you been a big help.

Haha glad I could be of service. :]

But I will also say that there are becoming more and more cases where as you put it, some guys need to grow more balls. Just as I have seen guys like my husband's friend that takes it to the extreme, there are indeed some guys who have been walked all over for not being assertive enough. Hell, I've even told some friends that they need to grow a pair because they were being treated like crap by their girlfriends/wives, and were basically walked all over. So in those cases, I can agree will telling them to grow a pair. lol

[Requiem of the Exodus]

Veolin

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Requiem of the Exodus

Veolin

Ive seen a mix of both so to say all men need more balls is a no. I don't think a guy should roll over and play dead, but at the same time I don't think it should be taken to the extreme of controlling.

Case in point, consider a friend of my husbands. He is currently getting divorced and is even going to so far as to harm his new relationship by demanding complete control and submission. Even going so far as placing double standards where as he can do no wrong and the female is always wrong. Even most of his guy friends have openly stated that he shouldn't be allowed to be in a relationship. Period. One reason being because he pushes it almost to a point of abuse.

But in relation to my husband and myself, we treat our relationship as a partnership. There are areas where he is definitely the man of the household, but he doesn't take it so far as to not consider my feelings or treat me subservient, rather I have just as much say in our home as he does. We each strive to make up for what the other may lack and better each other and our relationship in that way. It's balance instead of control.

What about his level of submission to you? Is that also in a healthy balance?

I have never forced him to be sub-servant to me, and he has not asked that I be sub-servant to him. So I suppose that any subservience that has come about in our relationship has been by our own accord in relation to considering each others feelings, and having a level of respect for each other. So yes, I would say so.

But to elaborate, I never tell my husband he absolutely can't do something unless it puts our family as a whole, or our daughter specifically, in danger or would leave her without things she needs. And besides that, any restrictions that have ever been placed on him have just as equally been placed on me as well and visa versa. I like him being the dominant in our household and he often gets the final say in almost everything, but there is also a level of respect and consideration that he has given me in return where as we approach decisions together and run our household together.

Thanks, you been a big help.

Haha glad I could be of service. :]

But I will also say that there are becoming more and more cases where as you put it, some guys need to grow more balls. Just as I have seen guys like my husband's friend that takes it to the extreme, there are indeed some guys who have been walked all over for not being assertive enough. Hell, I've even told some friends that they need to grow a pair because they were being treated like crap by their girlfriends/wives, and were basically walked all over. So in those cases, I can agree will telling them to grow a pair. lol

I know what you're talking about. My sister's boyfriend is an example of the latter.

[Requiem of the Exodus]

Holy bladerunner

Your the ******** abuser lousy son of a b***h whore stop complaining emo. do us a favor ******** off.!

.....

[Imaginary Marionette]

I enjoy my men to be manly ballsy whatevery men, to a point. But only to a point. If they take it to the extent where they won't listen to me, or where they try to hurt me, I'm gonna have some problems.

[Shurocloud]

In my opinion i see this as a somewhat comical discussion. If you like the guy who is domineering and assertive he is the kind of guy to do things spontaneously with very little regard for consequences. He will also be the one in control of the relationship and have power over many things both monetarily and emotionally in the relationship. If that's what you want go ahead, im not one to judge, but that kind of guy has a greater tendency to be violent and hateful if not in public then in private. If you choose a "submissive" guy then he will want the girl to take control. But then you have the equal opportunity guys who like to share everything with their partner, the love and the power over the relationship. I will admit it is quite hard to keep things in perfect balance but it can be done, and lately is being done more which is the way i think it should be done

[I got bored one day]

Requiem of the Exodus

Death and Misery

Why are you so interested in submission anyway? You keep repeating it.

Because the conversation was mainly about whether submission was a female trait.

I don't think submission is a trait found in humans really...

[Requiem of the Exodus]

Death and Misery

Requiem of the Exodus

Death and Misery

Why are you so interested in submission anyway? You keep repeating it.

Because the conversation was mainly about whether submission was a female trait.

I don't think submission is a trait found in humans really...

Care to explain?

[demonbarber14]

Skittish Nature-Boy

I wish WOMEN had more "balls"!

Hear, hear!

[Mighty Manlyman111]

Females are subconsciously and genetically inferior, that's the whole point of them. Women are supposed to be looking after the children and looking after the home, not doing man jobs (which they are remarkably horrible at).

Women are purposely lie to get their own way and they also use their body to gain power, such is the way of the animal kingdom... It is such a shame men have evolved out of such primitive things but women have not.

Men have become 'weakened' by women over the years through law and 'equal' rights which actually is more like suppressing males and having female dominance. Females love to go on about how 'superior' they are but you don't see guys doing that do you? I think that just proves the point itself. As I said, women are made to be weaker, less intelligent and inferior to males. This is why they love male dominance, even if they refuse to admit so, any women who says she hates being male dominated is a liar (as I stated earlier, such are their ways). wink

Because males are suppressed by females through cowardly tactics such as law and risk of isolation and hatred by their fellows, they do not like to do what is only natural of a male, and that is to show dominance and to look after their mate, males were designed to keep women stepping out of line and destroying society, you could blame society's downfall as present because of women; cheating, lying, corruption etc, all because males are not allowed to keep them in line.