Chain Banning
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:35:36 +0000
N3bu
Why do you equate inbreeding with superior? The obvious answer here would be because you think it equates to greater intellect and physical appearance, but since you only admitted to an "affect" I feel you may not be comfortable or confident stating that that affect is an improvement.
Either way as I remember it, no serious consensus has been made to state such a thing since the 1940s when eugenics was all the rage.
Either way as I remember it, no serious consensus has been made to state such a thing since the 1940s when eugenics was all the rage.
Of course the less inbred races are superior. Inbreeding has quite a large effect on various things. I stated the most important being intellect and physical appearance. Surely someone with a higher intellect would be considered superior than someone with a lower? Or are you saying that every Homo Sapien is equal despite these differences? There's been a lot of studies on this, one in particular from the University of Western Ontario & the University of Berkeley California encountered much differences between those of a pure and and inbred race...
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf